Knowledge, innovation, and change – The power of error in design and complex systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/16202024Keywords:
complex systems, error management, interdisciplinary design, iterative learning, innovationAbstract
This paper explores the relationship between complexity, error and design, highlighting how the dynamic interaction between these elements is crucial in addressing the challenges of contemporary design. An interdisciplinary analysis investigates the role of error as a strategic resource in education and professional practice, and a methodology is proposed that systematises the management of error, encouraging the emergence of innovative and adaptive solutions. The importance of a flexible and open approach is emphasised, recognising error as a central element in stimulating innovation, broadening perspectives, improving design processes and fostering ongoing growth in the field.
Article info
Received: 10/09/2024; Revised: 12/10/2024; Accepted: 14/10/2024
Downloads
Article Metrics Graph
References
Antiseri, D. (2017), “Scienza senza certezze”, in Ithaca | Viaggio nella Scienza, vol. IX, pp. 21-32. [Online] Available at: siba-ese.unisalento.it/files/ithaca/Ithaca_IX_2017.pdf [Accessed 27 September 2024].
Argyris, C. and Schön, D. A. (1998), Apprendimento organizzativo – Teoria, metodo e pratiche, Edizioni Guerini, Milano. [Online] Available at: guerini.it/index.php/prodotto/apprendimento-organizzativo/ [Accessed 27 September 2024].
Auricchio, V. (2018), “Agilità didattica – Luisa Collina sulla evoluzione delle scuole di design | Agile Education – Luisa Collina on the evolution of Design Schools”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 3, pp. 213-218. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/3282018 [Accessed 27 September 2024].
Bamford, G. (2002), “From analysis / synthesis to conjecture / analysis – A review of Karl Popper’s influence on design methodology in architecture”, in Design Studies, vol. 23, issue 3, pp. 245-261. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00037-0 [Accessed 27 September 2024].
Benes, R., Cellie, D., Czerwinsky, L. D. and Kopciowski, J. (2017), Per una pedagogia dell’errore – Verso una scuola amica, Asterios Editore, Trieste.
Binanti, L. (2001), Pedagogia, epistemologia e didattica dell’errore, Rubbettino Editore, Soveria Mannelli.
Bower, J. L. and Christensen, C. M. (1995), “Disruptive Technologies – Catching the Wave”, in Harvard Business Review, vol. 73, issue 1, pp. 43-53.
Cristallo, V. (2017), “Ricerca, sperimentazione e responsabilità del progetto”, in Flora, N. and Iarusso, F. (eds), Progetti mobili, LetteraVentidue, Siracusa, pp. 45-56.
Dalla Pozza, C. and Negro, A. (2017), Come distinguere scienza e non-scienza – Verificabilità, falsificabilità e confermabilità bayesiana, Carocci editore, Roma.
Di Giovanni, E. and Tiberio, M. (2022), “Per un’antropologia del design”, in Narrare i Gruppi, vol. 17, issue 1, pp. 110-125. [Online] Available at: iris.unipa.it/handle/10447/563320 [Accessed 27 September 2024].
Dominici, P. (2018), “The Hypertechnological Civilization and the Urgency of a Systemic Approach to Complexity – A New Humanism for the Hypercomplex Society”, in Floriani Neto, A. B., Caceres Nieto, E., Chiodi, G. and Petroccia, S. (eds), Governing turbulence, risk and opportunities in the complexity age, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle, pp. 22-44. [Online] Available at: cambridgescholars.com/resources/pdfs/978-1-5275-0756-2-sample.pdf [Accessed 27 September 2024].
Donà, M. (2012), Filosofia dell’errore – Le forme dell’inciampo, Bompiani, Milano.
Edmondson, A. C. (2023), Right kind of wrong – The science of failing well, Simon Element, New York.
Fagnoni, R. (2017), “Practicescape – Orizzonti della pratica nella ricerca in design”, in Riccini, R. (ed.), FRID 2017 – Sul Metodo / Sui Metodi – Esplorazioni per le identità del design, Mimesis, Milano, pp. 75-82.
Gawande, A. (2010), Checklist manifesto – How to get things right, Penguin Books India, New Delhi.
Hofstadter, D. R. (1999), Gödel, Escher, Bach – An eternal golden braid, Basic Books, New York.
Kolb, D. A. (1984), Experiential Learning – Experience as the source of learning and development, Prentice-Hall, Hoboken.
Lorenz, E. N. (1963), “Deterministic Nonperiodic Flow”, in Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 20, issue 2, pp. 130-141. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020<0130:DNF>2.0.CO;2 [Accessed 27 September 2024].
Maeda, J. (2006) The laws of simplicity – Design, technology, business, life, The MIT Press, Cambridge (US).
Maffei, S. (2022), “Expanding the Galaxy – Designing More-than-Human Futures”, in DIID | Disegno Industriale Industrial Design, vol. 75, article 8, pp. 14-21. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.30682/diid7521a [Accessed 27 September 2024].
Martin, P. (2024), Storie di errori memorabili, Editori Laterza, Roma-Bari.
Murphy, A. and Schifrin, M. (2024), “The Global 2000”, in Forbes, newspaper online, 06/06/2024. [Online] Available at: forbes.com/lists/global2000/ [Accessed 27 September 2024].
Norman, D. A. (2013), The design of everyday things, Basic Books, New York
Papanek, V. (2022), Design per il mondo reale – Ecologia umana e cambiamento sociale [or. ed. Design for the real world – Human ecology and social change, 1972], Quodlibet, Macerata.
Popper, K. R. (2009), Congetture e confutazioni – Lo sviluppo della conoscenza scientifica, Mulino, Bologna.
Popper, K. R. (1975), Conoscenza oggettiva – Un punto di vista evoluzionistico, Armando editore, Roma.
Reason, J. (2009), Human error, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S. and Camerer, C. (1998), “Introduction to Special Topic Forum – Not so Different after All – A Cross-Discipline View of Trust”, in The Academy of Management Review, vol. 23, issue 3, pp. 393-404. [Online] Available at: jstor.org/stable/259285 [Accessed 27 September 2024].
Simon, H. A. (1996), The sciences of the artificial, MIT Press, Cambridge (US).
Stefan, M. (2010), “A CV of failures”, in Nature, vol. 468, p. 467. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1038/nj7322-467a [Accessed 27 September 2024].
Sweller, J. (1988), “Cognitive Load During Problem Solving – Effects on Learning”, in Cognitive Science, vol. 12, issue 2, pp. 257-285. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4 [Accessed 27 September 2024].
Verganti, R. (2009), Design-Driven Innovation – Cambiare le regole della competizione innovando radicalmente il significato dei prodotti e dei servizi, Etas, Milano.
Wiener, N. (2019), Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine, MIT Press, Cambridge (US). [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11810.001.0001 [Accessed 27 September 2024].
Zurlo, F. (2019), “Designerly Way of Organizing – Il Design dell’organizzazione creativa | Designerly Way of Organizing – The Design of creative organization”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 5, pp. 11-20. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/522019 [Accessed 27 September 2024].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Claudia Porfirione, Xavier Ferrari Tumay, Isabel Leggiero
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This Journal is published under Creative Commons Attribution Licence 4.0 (CC-BY).
License scheme | Legal code
This License allows anyone to:
Share: copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt: remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms
Attribution: Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made; users may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.
No additional restrictions: Users may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices
Users do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give users all of the permissions necessary for their intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
