Transition product design. A framework proposal for a holistic approach to systemic design
Keywords:design for transition, social innovation, design for the common good, a consciousness of place, local resilience
The Transition Design (TD) discipline is based on a design framework and methodology that prioritises social and environmental well-being and the goals of local resilience and radical changes in socio-technical contexts. Terry Irwin (2019) sees two aspects of TD as fundamental: the idea that entire societies will face a transition to sustainable futures and the realisation that this will entail changes at the systemic level. As part of the ongoing disciplinary debate, this contribution investigates the potential of new design drivers, such as territorial value and local resilience, linked to specific case studies that can be seen as best practices. The result is a theoretical framework of eight guidelines that aims to answer some of the TD process’s problems and model the requirements that can then be replicated.
Achilli, F. (2019), “Senza confini – Le nuove frontiere del design”, in Rovatti, A. (ed.), Confini del Design, ADI – Delegazione Lombardia, Milano, pp. 77-79. [Online] Available at: re.public.polimi.it/retrieve/handle/11311/1129615/490339/ConfiniDesign_ Rovatti.pdf [Accessed 15 September 2022].
Bruni, L. (2020), “The Theory of Homo reciprocans”, in Becchetti, L., Bruni, L. and Zamagni, S. (eds), The Microeconomics of Wellbeing and Sustainability, pp. 271-293. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816027-5.00009-4 [Accessed 15 September 2022].
Ceschin, F. and Gaziulusoy, I. (2019), Design for Sustainability – A Multi-level Framework from Products to Socio-Technical Systems, Routledge, London. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.4324/9780429456510 [Accessed 15 September 2022].
Cowart, A. and Maione, D. (2022), “Transitioning Toward the Slow and Long – Developing Experiential Futures Approach Toward System Change in Fashion”, in Cuaderno | Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios en Diseño y Comunicación (Ensayos), vol. 157, pp. 29-63. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.18682/cdc.vi157.6844 [Accessed 15 September 2022].
Coyne, R. (2005), “Wicked problems revisited”, in Design studies, vol. 26, issue 1, pp. 5-17. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.005 [Accessed 15 September 2022].
Dash, A. (2016), “An epistemological reflection on social and solidarity economy”, in Forum for Social Economics, vol. 45, issue 1, pp. 61-87. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1080/07360932.2014.995194 [Accessed 15 September 2022].
Gaziulusoy, A. I. (2019), “Postcards from the Edge toward futures of design for sustainability transitions”, in Cuaderno | Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios en Diseño y Comunicación (Ensayos), vol. 73, pp. 67-84. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.18682/cdc.vi73.1038 [Accessed 15 September 2022].
Geels, F. W. and Schot, J. (2007), “Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways”, in Research Policy, vol. 36, issue 3, pp. 399-417. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003 [Accessed 15 September 2022].
Hess, C. and Ostrom, E. (2007), Understanding Knowledge as a Commons, from theory to practice, The MIT Press, Cambridge. [Online] Available at: jstor.org/stable/j.ctt5hhdf6? [Accessed 15 September 2022].
Irwin, T. (2019), “The emerging transition design approach”, in Cuaderno | Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios en Diseño y Comunicación (Ensayos), vol. 73, pp. 149-181. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.18682/cdc.vi73.1043 [Accessed 15 September 2022].
Irwin, T., Kossoff, G. and Tonkinwise, C. (2015), “Transition Design provocation”, in Design Philosophy Papers, vol. 13, issue 1, pp. 3-11. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1080/14487136.2015.1085688 [Accessed 15 September 2022].
Leff, E. (2009), “Degrowth, or deconstruction of the economy – Towards a sustainable world”, in Critical Currents | Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation – Occasional Paper Series, vol. 6, pp. 101-107. [Online] Available at: daghammarskjold.se/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/cc6_web.pdf [Accessed 15 September 2022].
Magnaghi, A. (2020), Il principio territoriale, Bollati Boringhieri, Torino.
Magnaghi, A. (ed.) (2012), Il territorio bene comune, Firenze University Press, Firenze.
Manzini, E. (2015), “Social Innovation and design-enabling, replicating and synergizing”, in Stebbing, P. and Tischner, U. (eds), Changing Paradigms – Designing for a Sustainable Future, Aalto University School of Arts, Design and Architecture, pp. 328-337. [Online] Available at: aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/34423 [Accessed 15 September 2022].
Norman, D. (2023), Design for a better world, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).
Ostrom, E. (2009), “A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems”, in Science, vol. 325, issue 5939, pp. 419-422. [Online] Available at: science.org/doi/full/10.1126/science.1172133 [Accessed 15 September 2022].
Thackara, J. (2019), “Bioregioning – Pathways to Urban-Rural Reconnection”, in She ji Journal of Design Economics and Innovation, vol. 5, pp. 15-28. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.01.002 [Accessed 15 September 2022].
Treccani (2022), Innovazióne. [Online] Available at: treccani.it/vocabolario/innovazione/ [Accessed 15 September 2022].
Veselova E. and Gaziulusoy, I. (2021), “Bioinclusive Collaborative and Participatory Design – A Conceptual Framework and a Research Agenda”, in Design and Culture | The Journal of the Design Studies Forum, vol. 14, issue 2, pp. 149-183. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2021.2019455 [Accessed 15 September 2022].
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Mario Bisson, Stefania Palmieri, Alessandro Ianniello, Luca Botta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This Journal is published under Creative Commons Attribution Licence 4.0 (CC-BY).
License scheme | Legal code
This License allows anyone to:
Share: copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt: remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms
Attribution: Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made; users may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.
No additional restrictions: Users may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Users do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give users all of the permissions necessary for their intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.