Transition product design. A framework proposal for a holistic approach to systemic design

Authors

  • Mario Bisson Politecnico di Milano (Italy)
  • Stefania Palmieri Politecnico di Milano (Italy)
  • Alessandro Ianniello Politecnico di Milano (Italy)
  • Luca Botta Politecnico di Milano (Italy)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/12182022

Keywords:

design for transition, social innovation, design for the common good, a consciousness of place, local resilience

Abstract

The Transition Design (TD) discipline is based on a design framework and methodology that prioritises social and environmental well-being and the goals of local resilience and radical changes in socio-technical contexts. Terry Irwin (2019) sees two aspects of TD as fundamental: the idea that entire societies will face a transition to sustainable futures and the realisation that this will entail changes at the systemic level. As part of the ongoing disciplinary debate, this contribution investigates the potential of new design drivers, such as territorial value and local resilience, linked to specific case studies that can be seen as best practices. The result is a theoretical framework of eight guidelines that aims to answer some of the TD process’s problems and model the requirements that can then be replicated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Metrics Graph

Author Biographies

Mario Bisson, Politecnico di Milano (Italy)

Architect, he is an Associate Professor at the Department of Design. He conducts research activities mainly in Environmental Design, Product Design and Visual Elements. He is the Scientific Director of the Interdepartmental Laboratory EDME (Environmental Design and Multisensory Experience) and the Colour Laboratory.
E-mail: mario.bisson@polimi.it

Stefania Palmieri, Politecnico di Milano (Italy)

PhD, she is an Associate Professor at the Department of Design. She deals with methods and processes, focusing on innovation processes concerning different production and organisational and cultural contexts to enhance and strengthen university-business collaboration. Keywords: multidisciplinarity and synergy of knowledge, interaction and multisensoriality.
E-mail: stefania.palmieri@polimi.it

Alessandro Ianniello, Politecnico di Milano (Italy)

Product Designer for Innovation, he is a PhD Candidate and Research Fellow at the Department of Design, where he also works as a tutor for some workshop courses. His research focuses mainly on the creative processes required to foster transformations towards sustainable futures.
E-mail: alessandro.ianniello@polimi.it

Luca Botta, Politecnico di Milano (Italy)

Product Designer for Innovation, he is a Junior Researcher at the EDME Laboratory (Environmental Design and Multisensory Experiences), Department of Design. His research focuses on Design for socio-technical system transitions.
E-mail: luca.botta@mail.polimi.it

References

Achilli, F. (2019), “Senza confini – Le nuove frontiere del design”, in Rovatti, A. (ed.), Confini del Design, ADI – Delegazione Lombardia, Milano, pp. 77-79. [Online] Available at: re.public.polimi.it/retrieve/handle/11311/1129615/490339/ConfiniDesign_ Rovatti.pdf [Accessed 15 September 2022].

Bruni, L. (2020), “The Theory of Homo reciprocans”, in Becchetti, L., Bruni, L. and Zamagni, S. (eds), The Microeconomics of Wellbeing and Sustainability, pp. 271-293. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816027-5.00009-4 [Accessed 15 September 2022].

Ceschin, F. and Gaziulusoy, I. (2019), Design for Sustainability – A Multi-level Framework from Products to Socio-Technical Systems, Routledge, London. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.4324/9780429456510 [Accessed 15 September 2022].

Cowart, A. and Maione, D. (2022), “Transitioning Toward the Slow and Long – Developing Experiential Futures Approach Toward System Change in Fashion”, in Cuaderno | Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios en Diseño y Comunicación (Ensayos), vol. 157, pp. 29-63. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.18682/cdc.vi157.6844 [Accessed 15 September 2022].

Coyne, R. (2005), “Wicked problems revisited”, in Design studies, vol. 26, issue 1, pp. 5-17. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.005 [Accessed 15 September 2022].

Dash, A. (2016), “An epistemological reflection on social and solidarity economy”, in Forum for Social Economics, vol. 45, issue 1, pp. 61-87. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1080/07360932.2014.995194 [Accessed 15 September 2022].

Gaziulusoy, A. I. (2019), “Postcards from the Edge toward futures of design for sustainability transitions”, in Cuaderno | Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios en Diseño y Comunicación (Ensayos), vol. 73, pp. 67-84. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.18682/cdc.vi73.1038 [Accessed 15 September 2022].

Geels, F. W. and Schot, J. (2007), “Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways”, in Research Policy, vol. 36, issue 3, pp. 399-417. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003 [Accessed 15 September 2022].

Hess, C. and Ostrom, E. (2007), Understanding Knowledge as a Commons, from theory to practice, The MIT Press, Cambridge. [Online] Available at: jstor.org/stable/j.ctt5hhdf6? [Accessed 15 September 2022].

Irwin, T. (2019), “The emerging transition design approach”, in Cuaderno | Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios en Diseño y Comunicación (Ensayos), vol. 73, pp. 149-181. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.18682/cdc.vi73.1043 [Accessed 15 September 2022].

Irwin, T., Kossoff, G. and Tonkinwise, C. (2015), “Transition Design provocation”, in Design Philosophy Papers, vol. 13, issue 1, pp. 3-11. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1080/14487136.2015.1085688 [Accessed 15 September 2022].

Leff, E. (2009), “Degrowth, or deconstruction of the economy – Towards a sustainable world”, in Critical Currents | Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation – Occasional Paper Series, vol. 6, pp. 101-107. [Online] Available at: daghammarskjold.se/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/cc6_web.pdf [Accessed 15 September 2022].

Magnaghi, A. (2020), Il principio territoriale, Bollati Boringhieri, Torino.

Magnaghi, A. (ed.) (2012), Il territorio bene comune, Firenze University Press, Firenze.

Manzini, E. (2015), “Social Innovation and design-enabling, replicating and synergizing”, in Stebbing, P. and Tischner, U. (eds), Changing Paradigms – Designing for a Sustainable Future, Aalto University School of Arts, Design and Architecture, pp. 328-337. [Online] Available at: aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/34423 [Accessed 15 September 2022].

Norman, D. (2023), Design for a better world, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).

Ostrom, E. (2009), “A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems”, in Science, vol. 325, issue 5939, pp. 419-422. [Online] Available at: science.org/doi/full/10.1126/science.1172133 [Accessed 15 September 2022].

Thackara, J. (2019), “Bioregioning – Pathways to Urban-Rural Reconnection”, in She ji Journal of Design Economics and Innovation, vol. 5, pp. 15-28. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.01.002 [Accessed 15 September 2022].

Treccani (2022), Innovazióne. [Online] Available at: treccani.it/vocabolario/innovazione/ [Accessed 15 September 2022].

Veselova E. and Gaziulusoy, I. (2021), “Bioinclusive Collaborative and Participatory Design – A Conceptual Framework and a Research Agenda”, in Design and Culture | The Journal of the Design Studies Forum, vol. 14, issue 2, pp. 149-183. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2021.2019455 [Accessed 15 September 2022].

Vaia Cube (credit: Vaia). AGATHÓN 12 | 2022

Downloads

Published

31-12-2022

How to Cite

Bisson, M., Palmieri, S., Ianniello, A. and Botta, L. (2022) “Transition product design. A framework proposal for a holistic approach to systemic design”, AGATHÓN | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, 12(online), pp. 202–211. doi: 10.19229/2464-9309/12182022.