Systemic solutions for the holistic well-being of cities. Processes, results and reflections
Today, post-industrial cities can be seen as Living Labs, places to experiment with urban innovation strategies, such as Nature-based Solutions, and to regenerate the natural and man-made ecosystems. These actions require a participatory process that applies co-design tools in the context of a quadruple helix approach, ensuring the Living Lab’s long-term resilience. In this context, this contribution intends to examine the implications of the use of co-design tools, from participatory workshops to SWOT mapping, in the specific context of the case study of Mirafiori Sud, in Turin, within the European project proGIreg (2018-2023), with a focus on the co-design experience of a green wall in a public dormitory of the City of Turin.
Arnstein, S. R. (2019), “A Ladder of Citizen Participation”, in Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 85, issue 1, pp. 24-34. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2018.1559388 [Accessed 25 March 2022].
Ascione, G. S., Cuomo, F., Mariotti, N. and Corazza, L. (2021), “Urban Living Labs, Circular Economy and Nature-Based Solutions – Ideation and Testing of a New Soil in the City of Turin Using a Multi-stakeholder Perspective”, in Circular Economy and Sustainability, vol. 1, issue 2, pp. 545-562. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00011-6 [Accessed 25 March 2022].
Baccarne, B., Mechant, P., Schuurman, D., Colpaert, P. and De Marez, L. (2014), “Urban socio-technical innovations with and by citizens”, in Interdisciplinary Studies Journal, vol. 3, issue 4, pp. 143-156. [Online] Available at: hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-4365378 [Accessed 25 March 2022].
Barborič, B., Baloh, M., Zuti, B., Podani, K., Udvari, B., Lukovics, M., Burzacchini, A., Philipp, A. and Winter, M. (2018), Territorial Attractiveness Monitoring Platform – A Handbook for Policy Planners, Urbasofia Srl and Geodetski inštitut Slovenije, Bucharest. [Online] Available at: ssrn.com/abstract=3331007 [Accessed 25 March 2022].
Björgvinsson, E., Ehn, P. and Hillgren, P. A. (2012), “Design things and design thinking – Contemporary participatory design challenges”, in Design Issues, vol. 28, issue 3, pp. 101-116. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00165 [Accessed 25 March 2022].
Boyle, D. and Harris, M. (2009), The challenge of co-production – How equal partnerships between professionals and the public are crucial to improving public services. [Online] Available at: camdencen.org.uk/Resources/Public%20services/The_Challenge_of_Co-production.pdf [Accessed 25 March 2022].
Breuer, H. and Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2017), “Values-based network and business model innovation”, in International Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 21, issue 3, pp. 1-35. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1142/S1363919617500281 [Accessed 25 March 2022].
Bulkeley, H., Broto, V. C. and Edwards, G. (2012), “Bringing climate change to the city – Towards low carbon urbanism?”, in Local environment, vol. 17, issue 5, pp. 545-551. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2012.681464 [Accessed 25 March 2022].
Celaschi, F. (2008), “Design come mediatore tra bisogni – La cultura del progetto tra arte scienza e problemi quotidiani – L’esempio dei Beni Culturali”, in Germak, C. (ed.), Uomo al centro del progetto – Design per un nuovo umanesimo | Man at the Centre of the Project – Design for a New Humanism, Allemandi, Torino, pp. 40-52. [Online] Available at: documen.site/download/uomo-al-centro-del-progetto-design-per-un-nuovo_pdf [Accessed 25 March 2022].
Comino, E. and Ferretti, V. (2016), “Indicators-based spatial SWOT analysis – Supporting the strategic planning and management of complex territorial systems”, in Ecological Indicators, vol. 60, pp. 1104-1117. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.09.003 [Accessed 25 March 2022].
Davies, C. and Lafortezza, R. (2017), “Urban green infrastructure in Europe – Is greenspace planning and policy compliant?”, in Land use policy, vol. 69, pp. 93-101. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.08.018 [Accessed 25 March 2022].
Deakin, M. and Reid, A. (2018), “Smart cities – Under-gridding the sustainability of city-districts as energy efficient-low carbon zones”, in Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 173, pp. 39-48. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.054 [Accessed 25 March 2022].
Ernstson, H., van der Leeuw, S. E., Redman, C. L., Meffert, D. J., Davis, G., Alfsen, C. and Elmqvist, T. (2010), “Urban transitions – On urban resilience and human-dominated ecosystems”, in Ambio – A Journal of Environment and Society, vol. 39, issue 8, pp. 531-545. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1007/s13280-010-0081-9 [Accessed 25 March 2022].
Felson, A. J., Pavao-Zuckerman, M., Carter, T., Montalto, F., Shuster, B., Springer, N., Stander, E. K. and Starry, O. (2013), “Mapping the design process for urban ecology researchers”, in BioScience, vol. 63, issue 11, pp. 854-865. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1525/bio.2013.63.11.4. 2016.010 [Accessed 25 March 2022].
Fisher, T. (2009), “Needed – Design in the Public Interest”, in The Chronicle of Higher Education, 01/05/2009. [Online] Available at: chronicle.com/article/needed-design-in-the-public-interest/ [Accessed 25 March 2022].
Frantzeskaki, N. and Kabisch, N. (2016), “Designing a knowledge co-production operating space for urban environmental governance – Lessons from Rotterdam, Netherlands and Berlin, Germany”, in Environmental Science & Policy, vol. 62, pp. 90-98. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.010 [Accessed 25 March 2022].
Friedman, A. L. and Miles, S. (2006), Stakeholders – Theory and practice, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Giraldo Nohra, C., Pereno, A. and Barbero, S. (2020), “Systemic design for policy-making – Towards the next circular regions”, in Sustainability, vol. 12, issue 11, pp. 1-22. [Online]Available at: doi.org/10.3390/su12114494 [Accessed 25 March 2022].
Gulsrud, N. M., Hertzog, K. and Shears, I. (2018), “Innovative urban forestry governance in Melbourne? Investigating ‘green placemaking’ as a nature-based solution”, in Environmental Research, vol. 161, pp. 158-167. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.11.005 [Accessed 25 March 2022].
Köhler, M. (2008), “Green facades-a view back and some visions”, in Urban Ecosystems, vol. 11, pp. 423-436. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1007/s11252-008-0063-x [Accessed 25 March 2022].
McNabola, A., Moseley, J., Reed, B., Bisgaard, T., Jossiasen, A. D., Melande, C., Whicher, A., Hytönen, J. and Schultz, O. (2013), Design for public good, Report 03/06/2013, Design Council. [Online] Available at: designcouncil.org.uk/resources/report/design-public-good [Accessed 25 March 2022].
Meroni, A., Fassi, D. and Simeone, G. (2013), “Design for social innovation as a form of designing activism – An action format”, in Nesta (ed.), Social Frontiers – The next edge of social innovation research, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow.
Nel, D. and Nel, V. (2021), “Governance for resilient smart cities”, in Frank, A. I. and Silver, C. (eds), Transformative Planning – Smarter, Greener and More Inclusive Practices, Routledge, London. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.4324/9781003178545 [Accessed 25 March 2022].
Pérez, G., Rincón, L., Vila, A., González, J. M. and Cabeza, L. (2011), “Green vertical systems for buildings as passive systems for energy savings”, in Applied Energy, vol. 88, issue 12, pp. 485-4859. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.06.032 [Accessed 25 March 2022].
Perini, K. and Magliocco, A. (2012), “The Integration of Vegetation in Architecture, Vertical and Horizontal Greened Surfaces”, in International Journal of Biology, vol. 4, issue 2, pp. 79-91. [Online] Available at: dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijb.v4n2p79 [Accessed 25 March 2022].
Perini, K., Ottelé, M., Haas, E. M. and Raiteri, R. (2011), “Greening the building envelope, façade greening and living wall systems”, in Open Journal of Ecology, vol. 1, issue 1, pp. 1-8. [Online] Available at: dx.doi.org/10.4236/oje.2011.11001 [Accessed 25 March 2022].
Radić, M., Dodig, M. B. and Auer, T. (2019), “Green Facades and Living Walls – A Review Establishing the Classification of Construction Types and Mapping the Benefits”, in Sustainability, vol. 11, issue 17, pp. 1-23. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.3390/su11174579 [Accessed 25 March 2022].
Robson, C. (2002), Real World Research, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford.
Safikhani, T., Abdullah, A. M., Ossen, D. R. and Baharvand, M. (2014), “A review of energy characteristic of vertical greenery systems”, in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 40, pp. 450-462. [Online] Available at: dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.166 2022.03.14 [Accessed 25 March 2022].
Simonsen, J. and Robertson, T. (eds) (2013), Routledge international handbook of participatory design, Routledge, London.
Song, Y., Kirkwood, N., Maksimović, Č., Zheng, X., O’Connor, D., Jin, Y. and Hou, D. (2019), “Nature based solutions for contaminated land remediation and brownfield redevelopment in cities – A review”, in Science of The Total Environment, vol. 663, pp. 568-579. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.347 [Accessed 25 March 2022].
Wieland, H., Polese, F., Vargo, S. L. and Lusch, R. F. (2012), “Toward a service (eco) systems perspective on value creation”, in International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology, vol. 3, issue 3, pp. 12-25. [Online] Available at: igi-global.com/article/content/71942 [Accessed 25 March 2022].
Copyright (c) 2022 Silvia Barbero, Carolina Giraldo Nohra, Cristian Campagnaro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This Journal is published under Creative Commons Attribution Licence 4.0 (CC-BY).
License scheme | Legal code
This License allows anyone to:
Share: copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt: remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms
Attribution: Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made; users may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.
No additional restrictions: Users may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Users do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give users all of the permissions necessary for their intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.