Landscapes without landscape architects. The ecological beauty of informal urban landscapes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/1342023Keywords:
green infrastructure, nature-based solutions, spontaneous vegetation, trace reading, urban microhabitatsAbstract
Regarding the maintenance of urban green infrastructure, most stakeholders prefer achieving an oversimplified aesthetic archetype of cleanliness and order at the cost of high maintenance, whilst landscape architects try to reproduce islands of near-natural vegetation even where the environmental factors typical of urban areas do not allow it. In the long term, the struggle between these two opposite ways of conceiving the look and the role of green infrastructure appears pointless: in the end, what decides the identity of most urban green infrastructure is the ‘vegetation by use’, that is, the daily people’s use of these spaces (whether accessible). By analysing the aesthetic value, the species composition, and the ecological meaning of the vegetation of some roadside habitats close to the city of Catania (Sicily), the Authors shed light on the possibility of enjoying low-cost, biodiverse and beautiful seasonally green areas.
Article info
Received: 30/04/2023; Revised: 07/05/2023; ; Accepted: 08/05/2023
Downloads
Article Metrics Graph
References
Argüelles, L. and March, H. (2022), “Weeds in action – Vegetal political ecology of unwanted plants”, in Progress in Human Geography, vol. 46, issue 1, pp. 44-66. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1177/03091325211054966 [Accessed 29 April 2023].
Bell, B. (1995), Fifty Years of Garden Machinery, Farming Press Books, Ipswich.
Bermingham, A. (1986), Landscape and Ideology – The English Rustic Tradition – 1740-1860, University of California Press, Los Angeles.
Böse, H. (1981), Die Aneignung von städtischen Freiräumen – Beiträge zur Theorie und sozialen Praxis des Freiraums, GhK, Kassel.
Burke, E. (1958), A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Canepa, M., Mosca, F., Barath, S., Changenet, A., Hauck, T. E., Ludwig, F., Roccotiello, E., Pianta, M., Selvan, S. U., Vogler, V. and Perini, K. (2022), “Ecolopes, oltre l’inverdimento – Un approccio multi-specie per lo spazio urbano | Ecolopes, beyond greening – A multi-species approach for urban design”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 11, pp. 238-245. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/11212022 [Accessed 29 April 2023].
Catalano, C., Pasta, S. and Guarino, R. (2021), “A Plant Sociological Procedure for the Ecological Design and Enhancement of Urban Green Infrastructure”, in Catalano, C., Andreucci, M. B., Guarino, R., Bretzel, F., Leone, M. and Pasta, S. (eds), Urban Services to Ecosystems – Green Infrastructure Benefits from the Landscape to the Urban Scale, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 31-60. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75929-2_3 [Accessed 29 April 2023].
Chiarucci, A., Araújo, M. B., Decocq, G., Beierkuhnlein, C. and Fernández-Palacios, J. M. (2010), “The concept of potential natural vegetation – An epitaph?”, in Journal of Vegetation Science, vol. 21, issue 6, pp. 1172-1178. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2010.01218.x [Accessed 29 April 2023].
Clément, G. (2004), Manifeste du Tiers Paysage, Sujet-Objet, Montreuil.
Cronon, W. (1996), “The Trouble with Wilderness – Or, Getting Back to the Wrong Nature”, in Environmental History, vol. 1, issue 1, pp. 7-28. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.2307/3985059 [Accessed 29 April 2023].
Daniel, T. C. (2001), “Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century”, in Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 54, issues 1-4, pp. 267-281. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00141-4 [Accessed 29 April 2023]
Filibeck, G., Petrella, P. and Cornelini, P. (2016), “All ecosystems look messy, but some more so than others – A case-study on the management and acceptance of Mediterranean urban grasslands”, in Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, vol. 15, pp. 32-39. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.11.005 [Accessed 29 April 2023].
Garrard, G. E., Williams, N. S. G., Mata, L., Thomas, J. and Bekessy, S. A. (2018), “Biodiversity Sensitive Urban Design”, in Conservation Letters, vol. 11, issue 2, e12411, pp. 1-10. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1111/conl.12411 [Accessed 29 April 2023].
Guarino, R., Andreucci, M. B., Leone, M., Bretzel, F., Pasta, S. and Catalano, C. (2021), “Urban Services to Ecosystems – An Introduction”, in Catalano, C., Andreucci, M. B., Guarino, R., Bretzel, F., Leone, M. and Pasta, S. (eds), Urban Services to Ecosystems – Green Infrastructure Benefits from the Landscape to the Urban Scale, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 1-10. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75929-2_1 [Accessed 29 April 2023].
Hard, G. (1998), Ruderalvegetation – Ökologie und Ethnoökologie, Ästhetik und Schutz, Arbeitsgemeinschaft Freiraum und Vegetation, Kassel.
Hard, G. (1995), Spuren und Spurenleser – Zur Theorie und Ästhetik des Spurenlesens in der Vegetation und anderswo, Universitätsverlag Rasch, Osnabrück.
Hüllbusch, K. H., Knittel, J. and Wegmann, A. (1994), “Untersuchung zum ‘Umgang mit Wildwuchs’ auf öffentlichen Verkehrsflächen”, in Notizbuch 34 der Kasseler Schule, Arbeitsgemeinschaft Freiraum und Vegetation, Kassel, pp. 33-146. [Online] Available at: zobodat.at/pdf/Notizbuch-Kasseler-Schule_34_1994_0001-0216.pdf [Accessed 29 April 2023].
Ignatieva, M. (2010), “Design and Future of Urban Biodiversity”, in Müller, N., Werner, P. and Kelcey, J. G. (eds), Urban Biodiversity and Design, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, pp. 118-144. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1002/9781444318654.ch6 [Accessed 29 April 2023].
Ignatieva, M. and Ahrné, K. (2013), “Biodiverse green infrastructure for the 21st century – From ‘green desert’ of lawns to biophilic cities”, in Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, vol. 37, issue 1, pp. 1-9. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.3846/20297955.2013.786284 [Accessed 29 April 2023].
Ignatieva, M., Meurk, C. D. and Newell, C. (2000), “Urban biotopes – The typical and unique habitats of city environments and their natural analogues”, in Stewart, G. H. and Ignatieva, M. (eds), Urban Biodiversity and Ecology as a Basis for Holistic Planning and Design – Proceedings of a Workshop Held at Lincoln University, Wickliffe Press, Christchurch, pp. 46-53. [Online] Available at: dspace.lincoln.ac.nz/handle/10182/58 [Accessed 29 April 2023]
Ignatieva, M., Meurk, C., Roon, M. V., Simcock, R. and Stewart, G. (2008), How to Put Nature into Our Neighbourhoods – Application of Low Impact Urban Design and Development (LIUDD) Principles, with a Biodiversity Focus, for New Zealand Developers and Homeowners, Manaaki Whenua Press, Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd, Lincoln.
Ignatieva, M., Meurk, C and. Stewart, G. (2008), “Low Impact Urban Design and Development (LIUDD) – Matching urban design and urban ecology”, in Landscape Review, vol. 12, issue 2, pp. 61-73. [Online] Available at: researcharchive.lincoln.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10182/617/lr_2008_12 _2_61.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [Accessed 29 April 2023].
Ikin, K., Le Roux, D. S., Rayner, L., Villaseñor, N. R., Eyles, K., Gibbons, P., Manning, A. D. and Lindenmayer, D. B. (2015), “Key lessons for achieving biodiversity-sensitive cities and towns”, in Ecological Management & Restoration, vol. 16, issue 3, pp. 206-214. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1111/emr.12180 [Accessed 29 April 2023].
Itani, M., Al Zein, M., Nasralla, N. and Talhouk, S. N. (2020), “Biodiversity conservation in cities – Defining habitat analogues for plant species of conservation interest”, in PLoS ONE, vol. 15, issue 6, article e0220355, pp. 1-25. [Online] Available at:doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220355 [Accessed 29 April 2023].
Jahani, A., Saffariha, M. and Ghiyasi, S. (2019), “Evaluating the aesthetic quality of the landscape in the environment – A Review of the Concepts and Scientific Developments in the World”, in International Journal of Environmental Science and Bioengineering, vol. 12, pp. 35-43. [Online] Available at: researchgate.net/publication/339428560_Evaluating_the_aesthetic_quality_ of_the_landscape_in_the_ environment_A_Review_ of_the_Concepts_and_Scientific_Developments_in_the_World [Accessed 29 April 2023].
Kirchhoff, T. (2020), “Prozessschutz – Geschichte und Typologie”, in Duttmann, R., Kühne, O. and Weber, F. (eds), Landschaft als Prozess, Springer Fachmedien, Wiesbaden, pp. 513-535. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-30934-3_24 [Accessed 29 April 2023].
Körner, S., Heger, T., Hadbawnik, K., Jäger, K. and Vicenzotti, V. (2002), “Stadtökologie und Freiraumnutzung – Freiräume an der Universität Gesamthochschule Kassel”, in Stadt und Grün, vol. 9, pp. 33-43. [Online] Available at: researchgate.net/publication/265206550_Stadtokologie _und_Freiraumnutzung_ Freiraume_an_der_Universitat _Gesamthochschule_Kassel [Accessed 29 April 2023].
Kowarik, I. (2018), “Urban wilderness – Supply, demand, and access”, in Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, vol. 29, pp. 336-347. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.05.017 [Accessed 29 April 2023].
Kowarik, I. (2011), “Novel urban ecosystems, biodiversity, and conservation”, in Environmental Pollution, vol. 159, issues 8-9, pp. 1974-1983. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.02.022 [Accessed 29 April 2023].
Kowarik, I. and von der Lippe, M. (2018), “Plant population success across urban ecosystems – A framework to inform biodiversity conservation in cities”, in Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 55, issue 5, pp. 2354-2361. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13144 [Accessed 29 April 2023].
Kühn, N. (2006), “Intentions for the Unintentional – Spontaneous Vegetation as the Basis for Innovative Planting Design in Urban Areas”, in Journal of Landscape Architecture, vol. 1, issue 2, pp. 46-53. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2006.9723372 [Accessed 29 April 2023].
Lepczyk, C. A., Aronson, M. F. J., Evans, K. L., Goddard, M. A., Lerman, S. B. and MacIvor, J. S. (2017), “Biodiversity in the City – Fundamental Questions for Understanding the Ecology of Urban Green Spaces for Biodiversity Conservation”, in BioScience, vol. 67, issue 9, pp. 799-807. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix079 [Accessed 29 April 2023].
Loidi, J. and Fernández-González, F. (2012), “Potential natural vegetation: reburying or reboring?”, in Journal of Vegetation Science, vol. 23, issue 3, pp. 596-604. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01387.x [Accessed 29 April 2023].
Lundholm, J. T. and Richardson, P. J. (2010), “Habitat analogues for reconciliation ecology in urban and industrial environments”, in Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 47, issue 5, pp. 966-975. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01857.x [Accessed 29 April 2023].
Lührs, H. (1994), Die Vegetation als Indiz der Wirtschaftsgeschichte – Dargestellt Am Beispiel Des Wirtschaftsgrünlandes Und Der Grasackerbrachen – Oder Von Omas Wiese Zum Queckengrasland Und Zurück, Dissertation Arbeitsgemeinschaft Freiraum und Vegetation, Kassel.
Mucina, L., Bültmann, H., Dierßen, K., Theurillat, J.-P., Raus, T., Čarni, A., Šumberová, K. et alii (2016), “Vegetation of Europe – Hierarchical floristic classification system of vascular plant, bryophyte, lichen, and algal communities”, in Applied Vegetation Science, vol. 19, issue S1, pp. 3-264. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12257 [Accessed 29 April 2023].
Nassauer, J. I. (1995), “Messy Ecosystems, Orderly Frames”, in Landscape Journal, vol. 14, issue 2, pp. 161-170. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.3368/lj.14.2.161 [Accessed 29 April 2023].
Ode, Å., Fry, G., Tveit, M. S., Messager, P. and Miller, D. (2009), “Indicators of perceived naturalness as drivers of landscape preference”, in Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 90, issue 1, pp. 375-383. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.10.013 [Accessed 29 April 2023].
Pellegrini, P. and Baudry, S. (2014), “Streets as new places to bring together both humans and plants – Examples from Paris and Montpellier (France)”, in Social & Cultural Geography, vol. 15, issue 8, pp. 871-900. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2014.974067 [Accessed 29 April 2023].
Pignatti, S., Guarino, R. and La Rosa, M. (eds) (2017-2019), Flora d’Italia, voll. 1-4, New Business Media and Edagricole, Milano-Bologna.
Puppim de Oliveira, J. A., Balaban, O., Doll, C. N. H., Moreno-Peñaranda, R., Gasparatos, A., Iossifova, D. and Suwa, A. (2011), “Cities and biodiversity – Perspectives and governance challenges for implementing the convention on biological diversity (CBD) at the city level”, in Biological Conservation, vol. 144, issue 5, pp. 1302-1313. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.12.007 [Accessed 29 April 2023].
Rupprecht, C. D. D. and Byrne, J. A. (2014), “Informal Urban Green-Space – Comparison of Quantity and Characteristics in Brisbane, Australia and Sapporo, Japan”, in PLoS ONE, vol. 9, issue 6, e99784, pp. 1-17. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099784 [Accessed 29 April 2023].
Serrano Giné, D., Pérez Albert, M. Y. and Palacio Buendía, A. V. (2021), “Aesthetic assessment of the landscape using psychophysical and psychological models – Comparative analysis in a protected natural area”, in Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 214, article 104197, pp. 1-9. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104197 [Accessed 29 April 2023].
Shane, D. G. (2013), “Urban Patch Dynamics and Resilience – Three London Urban Design Ecologies”, in Pickett, S. T. A., Cadenasso, M. L. and McGrath, B. (eds), Resilience in Ecology and Urban Design – Linking Theory and Practice for Sustainable Cities, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp. 131-161. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5341-9_7 [Accessed 29 April 2023].
Swanwick, C. (2009), “Society’s attitudes to and preferences for land and landscape”, in Land Use Policy, vol. 26, pp. S62-S75. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.08.025 [Accessed 29 April 2023].
Szczygiel, B. and Hewitt, R. (2000), “Nineteenth-Century Medical Landscapes – John H. Rauch, Frederick Law Olmsted, and the Search for Salubrity”, in Bulletin of the History of Medicine, vol. 74, issue 4, pp. 708-734. [Online] Available at: jstor.org/stable/44444779 [Accessed 29 April 2023].
Threlfall, C. G., Mata, L., Mackie, J. A., Hahs, A. K., Stork, N. E., Williams, N. S. G. and Livesley, S. J. (2017), “Increasing biodiversity in urban green spaces through simple vegetation interventions”, in Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 54, issue 6, pp. 1874-1883. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12876 [Accessed 29 April 2023].
Threlfall, C. G., Williams, N. S. G., Hahs, A. K. and Livesley, S. J. (2016), “Approaches to urban vegetation management and the impacts on urban bird and bat assemblages”, in Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 153, pp. 28-39. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.04.011 [Accessed 29 April 2023].
Trepl, L. (2012), Die Idee der Landschaft – Eine Kulturgeschichte von der Aufklärung bis zur Ökologiebewegung, Transcript Verl, Bielefeld.
Tzortzi, J. N. and Lux, M. S. (2022), “Rinverdire i centri storici – Il ruolo dello spazio pubblico nell’infrastruttura verde di Milano | Renaturing historical centres – The role of private space in Milan’s green infrastrucutres”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 11, pp. 226-237. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/11202022 [Accessed 02 May 2023].
Vanderheyden, V., Van der Horst, D., Van Rompaey, A. and Schmitz, S. (2014), “Perceiving the Ordinary – A Study of Everyday Landscapes in Belgium”, in Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, vol. 105, issue 5, pp. 591-603. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12066 [Accessed 29 April 2023].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Chiara Catalano, Thomas E. Hauck, Susann Ahn, Salvatore Pasta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This Journal is published under Creative Commons Attribution Licence 4.0 (CC-BY).
License scheme | Legal code
This License allows anyone to:
Share: copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt: remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms
Attribution: Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made; users may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.
No additional restrictions: Users may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices
Users do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give users all of the permissions necessary for their intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
