Simbiosi tra vegetazione e costruito. Un approccio olistico, sistemico e multilivello

Autori

  • Francesca Scalisi DEMETRA Ce.Ri.Med.
  • David Ness University of South Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/1122022

Parole chiave:

soluzioni basate sulla natura, infrastrutture verdi, mitigazione, resilienza, sufficienza

Abstract

Il cambiamento climatico è un effetto dell’azione antropica la quale incide sull’equilibrio del Pianeta prevalentemente con la crescita continua delle città e con l’aumento dei consumi che a loro volta determinano un uso indiscriminato di risorse non rinnovabili. Una soluzione a questo problema è spesso individuata nell’impiego di ‘soluzioni basate sulla natura’, capaci di offrire numerosi vantaggi e servizi per l’uomo e per l’ecosistema purché il verde, di per sé ecologico, non venga mercificato riducendo di fatto biodiversità e aumentando livelli di inquinamento. Il presente contributo mette in discussione un modello di crescita ‘illimitato’ e alcuni usi della vegetazione nel costruito in favore di un approccio basato sulla ‘sufficienza’ e di buone pratiche e sperimentazioni olistiche e illuminanti improntate al design biofilico, supportate da tecnologie di frontiera, fondate su pratiche vernacolari e sviluppate con le comunità locali, capaci di allargare l’obiettivo e affrontare la sfida climatica in un contesto più ampio e a diverse scale.

Downloads

I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili.

##plugins.generic.articleMetricsGraph.articlePageHeading##

Biografie autore

Francesca Scalisi, DEMETRA Ce.Ri.Med.

Architetto e PhD, è Responsabile del Dipartimento Ricerca presso il DEMETRA Ce.Ri.Med. (Centro Documentazione e Ricerca Euro-Mediterranea), Palermo (Italia). I suoi campi di ricerca riguardano la sostenibilità dell’ambiente costruito in termini di risparmio energetico degli edifici, i materiali green e le nanotecnologie.
E-mail: demetracerimed.scalisi@gmail.com

David Ness, University of South Australia

Architetto e PhD, è un Professore all’UniSA STEM. Si occupa dello studio di metodi per fornire più servizi con minori risorse ed emissioni di anidride carbonica e costi ridotti. Premiato con l’ARUP Global Research Challenge 2017, è stato consulente presso UN ESCAP e UN Habitat in materia di ‘crescita verde’ e infrastrutture eco-efficienti e inclusive.
E-mail: david.ness@unisa.edu.au

Riferimenti bibliografici

Ajuntament de Barcelona (2013), Barcelona Green Infrastructure and Biodiversity Plan 2020. [Online] Available at: ajuntament.barcelona.cat/ecologiaurbana/sites/default/files/Barcelona% 20green%20infrastructure%20and%20biodiversity%20plan%202020.pdf [Accessed 12 May 2022].

Block, I. (2019), “Greenery is often ‘sole legitimisation’ for unsustainable buildings says Céline Baumann”, in dezeen, 31/10/2019. [Online] Available at: dezeen.com/2019/10/31/celine-baumann-landscape-architecture/ [Accessed 12 May 2022].

Camps-Calvet, M., Langemeyer, J., Calvet-Mir, L. and Gómez-Baggethun, E. (2016), “Ecosystem services provided by urban gardens in Barcelona, Spain – Insights for policy and planning”, in Environmental Science & Policy, vol. 62, pp. 14-23. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.007 [Accessed 12 May 2022].

de Freitas Netto, S. V., Sobral, M. F. F., Ribeiro, A. R. B. and da Luz Soares, G. R. (2020), “Concepts and forms of greenwashing – A systematic review”, in Environmental Science Europe, vol. 32, article 19, pp. 1-12. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-0300-3 [Accessed 12 May 2022].

European Commission (2021a), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – Forging a Climate-Resilient Europe – The new EU Strategy on Adaptation to Climate Change, document 52021DC0082, 82 final. [Online] Available at: eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52021DC0082 [Accessed 12 May 2022].

European Commission (2021b), New European Bauhaus – Beautiful, Sustainable, Together. [Online] Available at: europa.eu/new-european-bauhaus/index_en [Accessed 12 May 2022].

European Commission (2019a), Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – Review of progress on implementation of the EU Green Infrastructure Strategy, document 52019DC0236, 236 final. [Online] Available at: eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2019:236:FIN [Accessed 12 May 2022].

European Commission (2019b), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – The European Green Deal, document 52019DC0640, 640 final. [Online] Available at: eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2019%3A640%3AFIN [Accessed 12 May 2022].

European Commission (2014), Building a Green Infrastructure for Europe, Publications Office. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.2779/54125 [Accessed 12 May 2022].

European Commission (2013), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – Green Infrastructure (GI) – Enhancing Europe’s Natural Capital, document 52013DC0249, 249 final. [Online] Available at: eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52013DC0249 [Accessed 12 May 2022].

Faivre, N., Fritz, M., Freitas, T., Boissezon, B. and Vandewoestijne, S. (2017), “Nature-based solutions in the EU – Innovating with nature to address social, economic and environmental problems”, in Environmental Research, vol. 159, pp. 509-518. [Online] Available at: dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.032 [Accessed 12 May 2022].

IEEP (2016), The Health and Social Benefits of Nature and Biodiversity Protection – Annex 1 – 20 Case Studies. [Online] Available at: ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/knowledge/pdf/Health%20and%20 Social%20Benefits%20of%20Nature%20-%20case%20studies.pdf [Accessed 12 May 2022].

IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2022a), Climate Change 2022 – Mitigation of Climate Change, Switzerland. [Online] Available at: report.ipcc.ch/ar6wg3/pdf/IPCC_AR6_WGIII_FinalDraft_ FullReport.pdf [Accessed 12 May 2022].

IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2022b), Climate Change 2022 – Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability – Summary for Policymakers, Switzerland. [Online] Available at: ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGII_FinalDraft_ FullReport.pdf [Accessed 12 May 2022].

Kohlstedt, K. (2016), “Renderings vs reality – The improbable rise of tree-covered skyscrapers”, in 99% Invisible City, 04/11/2016. [Online] Available at: 99percentinvisible.org/article/renderings-vs-reality-rise-tree-covered-skyscrapers/ [Accessed 12 May 2022].

Moreno, C. (2020), Projet Portes de Paris – Ville du Quart d’Heure Territoire de la Demi-Heure – Transitions Urbaines et Territoriales, Livre Blanc. [Online] Available at: chaire-eti.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Livre-Blanc-2019.pdf [Accessed 12 May 2022].

New European Bauhaus High-Level Round Table (2021), New European Bauhaus Concept Paper, NEB High-Level Round Table, 30 June. [Online] Available at: europa.eu/new-european-bauhaus/high-level-roundtable-visions_en [Accessed 12 May 2022].

Olson, E. (2021), “Plants on Rooftops – Greenwashing in Architecture”, in The Climate Change Review, 08/02/2021. [Online] Available at: ucsdclimatereview.org/post/plants-on-rooftops-greenwashing-in-architecture [Accessed 12 May 2022].

Parker, J. and Zingoni de Baro M. E. (2019), “Green Infrastructure in the Urban Environment – A Systematic Quantitative Review”, in Sustainability, vol. 11, issue 11, 3182, pp. 1-20. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.3390/su11113182 [Accessed 12 May 2022].

Pawlowska K. and B. Jawecki (2021), “The determination of priority areas for the construction of green roofs with use of the urban valorisation method”, in Sustainability, vol. 13, 13227, pp. 1-24. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.3390/su132313227 [Accessed 12 May 2022].

Poletto, M. (2018), The Urbansphere – Architecture in the age of ubiquitous computing, Doctoral Thesis, RMTI University. [Online] Available at: researchrepository.rmit.edu.au/esploro/outputs/doctoral/The-Urbansphere-Architecture-in-the-age/9921861966101341 [Accessed 12 May 2022].

Savas, W. (2016), “Green Infrastructure and Urban Biodiversity”, in Landscape Architecture Frontiers, vol. 4, issue 3, pp. 40-51. [Online] Available at: journal.hep.com.cn/laf/EN/Y2016/V4/I3/40 [Accessed 12 May 2022].

Shen, Z., Li, Y., Yang, K. and Chen, L. (2019), “The emerging cross-disciplinary studies of landscape ecology and biodiversity in China”, in Journal of Geographic Science, vol. 29, issue 7, pp. 1063-1080. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1007/s11442-019-1645-7 [Accessed 12 May 2022].

Tran, V. V., Park, D. and Lee, Y.-C. (2020), “Indoor Air Pollution, Related Human Diseases, and Recent Trends in the Control and Improvement of Indoor Air Quality”, in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 17, issue 8, article 2927, pp. 1-27. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082927 [Accessed 12 May 2022].

UN – United Nations (2022), Goal 11 – Make cities inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable. [Online] Available at: unric.org/en/sdg-11/ [Accessed 12 May 2022].

UN Environment and IEA – International Energy Agency (2017), Global Status Report 2017 – Towards a zero-emission, efficient and resilient buildings and construction sector. [Online] Available at: unep.org/news-and-stories/story/buildings-and-construction-sector-grows-time-running-out-cut-energy-use-and [Accessed 12 May 2022].

Valenti, A. and Pasquero, C. (2021), “La seconda vita dei micro organismi – Il design biodigitale per una nuova ecologia dello spazio e del comportamento | The second life of micro-organisms – Bio-digital design for a new ecology of space and behaviour”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 9, pp. 42-53. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/942021 [Accessed 12 May 2022].

Xing, Y., Jones, P. and Donnison, I. (2017), “Characterisation of nature-based solutions for the built environment”, in Sustainability, vol. 9, issue 1, 149, pp. 1-20. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.3390/su9010149 [Accessed 12 May 2022].

Ying, J., Zhang, X., Zhang, Y. and Bilan, S. (2021), “Green infrastructure – Systematic literature review”, in Economic Research – Ekonomska Istraživanja, pp. 1-24. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2021.1893202 [Accessed 12 May 2022].

Zhang, K. and Chui, T. F. M. (2019), “Linking hydrological and bioecological benefits of green infrastructures across spatial scales – A literature review”, in Science of the Total Environment, vol. 646, pp. 1219-1231. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.355 [Accessed 12 May 2022].

La Fabbrica dell’Aria designed by PNAT – AGATHÓN 11_2022

##submission.downloads##

Pubblicato

30-06-2022

Come citare

Scalisi, F. e Ness, D. (2022) «Simbiosi tra vegetazione e costruito. Un approccio olistico, sistemico e multilivello», AGATHÓN | International Journal of Architecture Art and Design, 11(online), pagg. 26–39. doi: 10.19229/2464-9309/1122022.

Puoi leggere altri articoli dello stesso autore/i

1 2 > >>