Generative design and industrial product. Connecting physical/digital dimensions of the project

  • Davide Paciotti University of Camerino (Italy)
  • Alessandro Di Stefano University of Camerino (Italy)
Keywords: computational design, morphogenesis, additive manufacturing, form research, parametricism

Abstract

The evolution of modelling techniques has made possible to connect in a more efficient way what is physical and what is virtually designed, using simulation processes that have allowed the evolution of conditions of use and material production of the model. This contribution aims to discuss, by presenting emblematic case studies, how the implementation of new virtual technologies of generative parametric modelling has allowed to evolve and improve, in terms of efficiency and innovation, the development of industrial products. Thus, the designer assumes a central role in the experimentation of new design methodologies aimed at the use of virtual models not as a simple formal expression, but as an optimisation process from multiple points of view.

Author Biographies

Davide Paciotti, University of Camerino (Italy)

Designer and PhD in Innovative Technologies and Industrial Design, he is a Research Fellow at the SAAD. His research activity focuses on the evolution of the industrial product through new additive production processes combined with parametric generative modelling.
E-mail: davide.paciotti@unicam.it

Alessandro Di Stefano, University of Camerino (Italy)

Designer, he is a Research Fellow at the SAAD. His research activity is aimed at tracing the new potential expressed by software and technologies of digital production, using them to solve critical issues of a productive, technical and aesthetic nature that characterise the industrial design project.
E-mail: alessandro.distefano@unicam.it

References

Ajla, A. (2016), Integrating Innovation in Architecture – Design, Methods and Technology for Progressive Practice and Research, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1002/9781119164807 [Accessed 23 October 2021].

De Giovanni, G. and Sposito, C. (2019) “Dettagli d’autore – Dal disegno manuale dei grandi Maestri a quello digitale delle Archistar | Master’s details – From hand-made drawing of the great masters to the digital drawing of Starchitects”, in Techne | Journal of Technology for Architecture and Environment, vol. 18, pp. 99-109. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.13128/techne-7516 [Accessed 15 October 2021].

Gallagher, C. L., Reaser, L., Crane, P., Ataide, R. A., Mauerman, D., Undesser, M., Nunez, D. and Ku-shner, A. (2014), Can 3D printing unlock bioinspiration’s full potential?, Fermanian Business & Economic Institute, San Diego. [Online] Available at: docplayer.net/38411869-Can-3d-printing-unlock-bioinspiration-s-full-potential.html [Accessed 25 October 2021].

Langella, C. and Santulli, C. (2017), “Processi di crescita biologica e Design parametrico”, in MD Journal, vol. 3, n. 1, pp. 14-27. [Online] Available at: mdj.materialdesign.it/index.php/mdj/article/view/85 [Accessed 18 October 2021].

Marsault, X. (2017), Eco-generative Design for Early Stages of Architecture, vol. 1, Wiley-ISTE, London-Hoboken.

Migliore, E., Caruso, I. and Giambattista, A. (2015), “Digital materials – La nuova materialità biologicamente digitale”, in Digicult, 02/09/2015. [Online] Available at: digicult.it/it/news/digital-materials-a-new-biologically-digital-materiality/ [Accessed 25 October 2021].

Oxman, R. (2017), “Thinking difference – Theories and models of parametric design thinking”, in Design Studies, n. 52, pp. 4-39. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.06.001 [Accessed 23 October 2021].

Romero, M. E. (2014), “Physical Computing – Strumento progettuale per i designer di oggi”, in Rossi, M. and Casale, A. (eds), Uno (nessuno) centomila – Prototipi in movimento – Trasformazioni dinamiche del disegno e nuove tecnologie per il design – Workshop marzo-maggio 2014, Maggioli, Santarcangelo di Romagna (RN), pp. 125-136. [Online] Available at: re.public.polimi.it/retrieve/handle/11311/848734/87462/unonessunofull.pdf [Accessed 25 October 2021].

Schumacher, P. (2016), “Parametricism 2.0 – Gearing Up to Impact the Global Built Environment”, in Architectural Design, vol. 86, issue 2, pp. 8-17. [Online] Available at: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/15542769/2016/86/2 [Accessed 25 October 2021].

Schumacher, P. (2009), “Parametricism – A new global style for architecture and urban design”, in AD Architectural Design, vol. 79, issue 4, pp. 14-23. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1002/ad.912 [Accessed 26 October 2021].

Sennett, R. (2008), L’uomo artigiano, Feltrinelli, Milano.

Stinson, L. (2017), “John Maeda – If You Want to Survive in Design, You Better Learn to Code”, in Wired, 15/03/2017. [Online] Available at: wired.com/2017/03/john-maeda-want-survive-design-better-learn-code/ [Accessed 20 October 2021].

von Uexküll, J. (2015), Biologia Teoretica, Macerata, Quodlibet.

GO By Benjamin Hubert in collaboration with Layer design, Materialise, 2016 (credit: B. Hubert). AGATHÓN 10 | 2021
Published
2021-12-31
How to Cite
Paciotti, D. and Di Stefano, A. (2021) “Generative design and industrial product. Connecting physical/digital dimensions of the project”, AGATHÓN | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, 10(online), pp. 158-167. doi: 10.19229/2464-9309/10142021.
Section
Design | Essays & Viewpoint
Share |