Design Innovation Typologies. A critical Analysis of a Complex Relationship
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/5142019Keywords:
innovation theories, product innovation, aesthetic innovation, innovation of use, meaning innovationAbstract
In the literature, many types of product innovation are described. In this article, we analyze the three design-related innovation typologies that seem most discussed and agreed upon: i) aesthetic innovation; ii) innovation of use; iii) meaning innovation. While allowing overlaps and complementarities, each typology focuses on a specific aspect of a product’s innovation. Over time, such specificities prevented the formulation of an integrated theoretical model able to connect them together and express logical and functional relations among them. In this article – through a systematic analysis of the literature of the last 30 years – we aim to identify a theoretical model that underlines the specific drivers of any innovation typology, at the same time composing them in a coherent framework in which some are considered logical and instrumental antecedents with respect to higher level of innovation.
Downloads
Article Metrics Graph
References
Abras, C., Maloney-Krichmar, D. and Preece, J. (2004), “User-centered design”, in Bainbridge, W. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp. 445-456.
Anselmi, L. (2004), “La qualità d’uso del prodotto elettrodomestico”, in Rampino, L. (ed.), Sapere, immaginare, fare – Il design d’innovazione per l’elettrodomestico, Edizioni POLI.design, Milano.
Bandinelli, R. et alii (2013), “New product development in the fashion industry: An empirical investigation of Italian firms”, in International Journal of Engineering Business Management, vol. 5, pp. 5-31.
Barthes, R. (1983), The fashion system, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Bettiol, M. and Micelli, S. (2006), The strategic role of design for the competitiveness of the Italian industrial system. [Online] Available at: pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a178/e5fa93bbb19a871e1aef22dde35b2c47961c.pdf?_ga=2.250636422.1807700463.1555362691-1890251487.1555255686 [Accessed 7 April 2019].
Brown, T. (2008), “Design thinking”, in Harvard Business Review, vol. 86, pp. 84-94.
Bürdek, B. E. (2005), Design – History, theory and practice of product design, Birkhäuser, Basel.
Cappetta, R., Cillo, P. and Ponti, A. (2006), “Convergent designs in fine fashion: An evolutionary model for stylistic innovation”, in Research Policy, vol. 35, pp. 1273-1290.
Cautela, C. and Simoni, M. (2013), Product design strategies in technological change, McGraw-Hill, Milano.
Chen, K. and Owen, C. L. (1997), “Form language and style description”, in Design Studies, vol. 18, pp. 249-274.
Christensen, C. M. (2013), The innovator’s dilemma – When new technologies cause great firms to fail, Harvard Business Review Press, Boston (MA).
Cillo, P. and Verona, G. (2008), “Search styles in style searching: Exploring innovation strategies in fashion firms”, in Long Range Planning, vol. 41, pp. 650-671.
Cooper, R. G. (1990), “Stage-gate systems: a new tool for managing new products”, in Business Horizons, vol. 33, pp. 44-55.
Cooper, R. G., Edgett, S. J. and Kleinschmidt, E. J. (2001), Portfolio management for new products, Basic Books, Cambridge (MA).
Cross, N. (2011), Design Thinking – Understanding How Designers Think and Work, Berg, Oxford-New York.
Cross, N. (2001), “Designerly Ways of Knowing: Design Discipline Versus Design Science”, in Design issues, vol. 17, pp. 49-55.
Cross, N. (1993), “Science and Design Methodology: a Review”, in Research in Engineering Design, vol. 5, pp. 63-69.
Cross, N. (1984), Developments in Design Methodology, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
Cross, N., Dorst, K. and Roozenburg, N. (eds) (1992), Research in Design Thinking, Delft University Press, Delft, Netherlands.
Dell’Era, C. et alii (2011), “Language Brokering: stimulating creativity during the concept development phase”, in Creativity and Innovation Management, vol. 20, pp. 36-48.
Dell’Era, C. and Verganti, R. (2007), “Strategies of innovation and imitation of product languages”, in Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 24, pp. 580-599.
Desmet, P. M. and Hekkert, P. (2007), “Framework of product experience”, in International Journal of Design, vol. 1, pp. 57-66.
Dorst, K. (2011), “The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application”, in Design Studies, vol. 32, pp. 521-532.
Dosi, G. (1982), “Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change”, in Research Policy, vol. 11, pp. 147-162.
Dreyfuss, H. (1967), Designing for people, Paragraphic Books, New York.
Eisenman, M. (2007), “Aesthetic innovation: Changing institutional logics in standardized high-technology industries”, in Technology, Innovation and Institutions Working Paper Series, Technology Commercialization Centre at the University of Alberta, Alberta, pp. 11-17.
Eppinger, S. D. and Ulrich, K. T. (1995), Product design and development, McGraw Hill, New York.
Fann, K. T. (2012), Peirce’s theory of abduction, Springer Science & Business Media, New York.
Gaver, W. W. (1991), “Technology affordances”, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, New Orleans, Louisiana, April 28 - May 2 1991, ACM, New York, pp. 79-84.
Gibson, J. J. (1979), The ecological approach to visual perception, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
Hargadon, A. and Sutton, R. I. (1997), “Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm”, in Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 42, pp. 716-749.
Holbrook, M. B. and Hirschman, E. C. (1982), “The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings and fun”, in Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 9, pp. 132-140.
Karjalainen, T.-M. (2007), “It looks like a Toyota: Educational approaches to designing for visual brand recognition”, in International Journal of Design, vol. 1 pp. 67-81.
Karjalainen, T.-M. and Snelders, D. (2010), “Designing visual recognition for the brand”, in Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 27, pp. 6-22.
Kotler, P. and Rath, G. A. (1984), “Design: A powerful but neglected strategic tool”, in Journal of Business Strategy, vol. 5, pp. 16-21.
Krippendorff, K. (2005), The semantic turn – A new foundation for design, CRC Press, New York.
Kuhn, T. S. (2012), The structure of scientific revolutions, University of Chicago Press, London.
Martin, R. (2009), The design of business – Why design thinking is the next competitive advantage, Harvard Business Press.
Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1977), “In search of a useful theory of innovation”, in Research Policy, vol. 6, pp. 36-76.
Norman, D. A. (2004), Emotional design, Apogeo, Milano.
Norman, D. A. (1988), The Psychology of Everyday Things, Basic Books, New York.
Norman, D. A. and Draper, S. W. (1986), User centered system design – New perspectives on human-computer interaction, CRC Press, New York.
Otto, K. N. and Wood, K. L. (1998), “Product evolution: a reverse engineering and redesign methodology”, in Research in Engineering Design, vol. 10, pp. 226-243.
Papanek, V. (1983), Design for human scale, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
Peirce, C. S. (1991), Peirce on signs – Writings on semiotic, University of North Carolina Press Books.
Queneau, R. (1983), Esercizi di stile, Einaudi, Torino.
Rampino, L. (2011), “The innovation pyramid: A categorization of the innovation phenomenon in the product-design field”, in International Journal of Design, vol. 5, pp. 3-16.
Ravasi, D., Rindova, V. and Dalpiaz, E. (2012), “The cultural side of value creation”, in Strategic Organization, vol. 10. pp. 231-239.
Rindova, V., Dalpiaz, E. and Ravasi, D. (2011), “A cultural quest: a study of organizational use of new cultural resources in strategy formation”, in Organization Science, vol. 22, pp. 413-431.
Rindova, V. P. and Petkova, A. P. (2007), “When is a new thing a good thing? Technological change, product form design, and perceptions of value for product innovations”, in Organization Science, vol. 18, pp. 217-232.
Rubin, J. (1994), Handbook of usability testing, Wiley, New York.
Semprini, A. (ed.) (1999), Il senso delle cose – I significati sociali e culturali degli oggetti quotidiani, Franco Angeli, Milano.
Simoni, M., Cautela, C. and Zurlo, F. (2014), “Product design strategies in technological shifts: An explorative study of Italian design-driven companies”, in Technovation, vol. 34, pp. 702-715.
Tran, Y. (2010), “Generating stylistic innovation: a process perspective”, in Industry and Innovation, vol. 17, pp. 131-161.
Verganti, R. (2017), Overcrowded: designing meaningful products in a world awash with ideas, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).
Verganti, R. (2009), Design driven innovation – Changing the rules of competition by radically innovating what things mean, Harvard Business Press.
Verganti, R. (2008), “Design, meanings, and radical innovation: a metamodel and a research agenda”, in Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 25, pp. 436-456.
Verganti, R. (2003), “Design as brokering of languages: Innovation strategies in Italian firms”, in Design Management Journal | Former Series, vol. 14, pp. 34-42.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This Journal is published under Creative Commons Attribution Licence 4.0 (CC-BY).
License scheme | Legal code
This License allows anyone to:
Share: copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt: remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms
Attribution: Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made; users may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.
No additional restrictions: Users may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices
Users do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give users all of the permissions necessary for their intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
