Digitale e circolarità in edilizia. Le KETs per la gestione degli scarti nell'Unione Europea
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/13212023Parole chiave:
digitalizzazione, tecnologie abilitanti chiave, economia circolare, rifiuti da costruzione e demolizione, scoping reviewAbstract
L’articolo analizza potenzialità e limiti dell’impiego delle tecnologie abilitanti della transizione digitale per la gestione dei rifiuti da costruzione e demolizione in edilizia (BIM, GIS, Realtà Virtuale e Aumentata, Fabbricazione Digitale, Blockchain, Internet of Things, Digital Twin, Intelligenza Artificiale) nel contesto dell’Unione Europea. Lo studio adotta il metodo della Scoping Review per restituire gli esiti di una rassegna di letteratura scientifica a partire dal 2016, anno del Primo Piano di Azione Europeo per l’Economia Circolare e del primo Protocollo per la Demolizione Selettiva. I risultati sono classificati per provenienza geografica, anno di pubblicazione, settore disciplinare, numero di citazioni e contenuti. Obiettivo generale del contributo è individuare apporti originali, scientificamente validati, per perfezionare ulteriori linee di ricerca nella relazione tra tecnologie digitali e cultura della circolarità nel settore delle costruzioni.
Info sull'articolo
Ricevuto: 20/03/2023; Revisionato: 08/05/2023; Accettato: 11/05/2023
Downloads
##plugins.generic.articleMetricsGraph.articlePageHeading##
Riferimenti bibliografici
Agarwal, R., Chandrasekaran, S. and Sridhar, M. (2016), “Imaging construction’s digital future”, in McKinsey.com, 24/06/2016. [Online] Available at: mckinsey.com/capabilities/operations/our-insights/imagining-constructions-digital-future [Accessed 11 May 2023].
Aldebei, F. and Dombi, M. (2021), “Mining the Built Environment – Telling the Story of Urban Mining”, in Buildings, vol. 11, issue 9, article 388, pp. 1-18. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.3390/buildings11090388 [Accessed 10 May 2023].
Arksey, H. and O’Malley, L. (2005), “Scoping studies – Towards a methodological framework”, in International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 8, issue 1, pp. 19-32. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616 [Accessed 10 May 2023].
Baiani, S. and Altamura, P. (2019), “Il Processo del Progetto per la Resource Productivity – Un Caso Studio | The Design Process towards Resource Productivity – A Case Study”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 5, pp. 83-92. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/592019 [Accessed 10 May 2023].
Baiani, S. and Altamura, P. (2018), “Superuse e upcycling dei materiali di scarto in architettura – Progetto e sperimentazione | Waste materials superuse and upcycling in architecture – Design and experimentation”, in Techne | Journal of Technology for Architecture and Environment, vol. 16, pp. 142-151. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.13128/Techne-23035 [Accessed 10 May 2023].
Baratta, A. F. L. (2021), “Dalle politiche per la circolarità delle risorse alla strategia zero rifiuti | From resource circularity policies to the zero-waste strategy”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 9, pp. 32-41. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/932021 [Accessed 10 May 2023].
Bernstein, P. (2018), Architecture, Design, Data – Practice Competency in the Era of Computation, Birkhäuser, Basel.
Cays, J. (2017), “Life-Cycle Assessment – Reducing environmental impact risk with workflow data you can trust”, in Architectural Design, vol. 87, issue 3, pp. 96-103. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1002/ad.2179 [Accessed 10 May 2023].
Chaillou, S. (2022), Artificial Intelligence and Architecture – From Research to Practice, Birkhäuser, Basel.
Cossu, R., Salier, V. and Bisinella, V. (2012), “Introduction – The Urban Mining Concept”, in Cossu, R., Salier, V. and Bisinella, V. (eds), Urban Mining – A global cycle approach to resource recovery from solid waste, CISA, Padova, pp. 13-20.
Daudt, H. M., van Mossel, C. and Scott, S. J. (2013), “Enhancing the scoping study methodology – A large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework”, in BMC Med Res Methodology, vol. 13, issue 48, pp. 1-9. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-48 [Accessed 10 May 2023].
Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2015), Delivering the Circular Economy – A Toolkit for Policy Makers. [Online] Available at: ellenmacarthur foundation.org/assets/downloads/publications/EllenMacArthurFoundation_ PolicymakerToolkit.pdf [Accessed 04 May 2023].
European Commission (2020a), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – A new Circular Economy Action Plan For a cleaner and more competitive Europe, document 52020DC0098, 98 final. [Online] Available at: eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2020%3A98%3AFIN [Accessed 10 May 2023].
European Commission (2020b), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – A Renovation Wave for Europe – Greening our buildings, creating jobs, improving lives, document 52020DC0662, 662 final. [Online] Available at: eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0662 [Accessed 10 May 2023].
European Commission (2019), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the Implementation of the Circular Economy Action Plan, document 52019DC0190, 190 final. [Online] Available at: eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52019DC0190 [Accessed 10 May 2023].
European Commission (2018), A background to Level(s) and overview of the testing phase. [Online] Available at: environment.ec.europa.eu/ publications/background-levels-and-overview-testing-phase_en [Accessed 10 May 2023].
European Commission (2016), EU Construction & Demolition Waste Management Protocol. [Online] Available at: ec.europa.eu/docsroom /documents/20509/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/native [Accessed 10 May 2023].
European Commission (2015), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Closing the loop – An EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy, document 52019DC0190, 614 final. [Online] Available at: eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52015DC0614 [Accessed 10 May 2023].
European Parliament and the Council (2014), Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC – Text with EEA relevance, document 32014L0024. [Online] Available at: eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/24/oj [Accessed 10 May 2023].
Ferreira, R. L. S., Anjos, M. A. S., Maia, C., Pinto, L., de Azevedo, A. R. G. and de Brito, J. (2021), “Long-term analysis of the physical properties of the mixed recycled aggregate and their effect on the properties of mortars”, in Construction and Building Materials, vol. 274, article 121796, pp. 1-12. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121796 [Accessed 10 May 2023].
Guerrero-Bote, V. P., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Mendoza, A. and de Moya-Anegón, F. (2021), “Comparative Analysis of the Bibliographic Data Sources Dimensions and Scopus – An Approach at the Country and Institutional Levels”, in Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, vol. 5, article 593494, pp. 1-12. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.3389/frma.2020.593494 [Accessed 10 May 2023].
Ghosh, S. K. (ed.) (2020), Urban Mining and Sustainable Waste Management, Springer Nature, Singapore. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0532-4 [Accessed 10 May 2023].
Grant, M. J. and Booth, A. (2009), “A typology of reviews – An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies”, in Health Information and Libraries Journal, vol. 26, issue 2, pp. 91-108. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x [Accessed 10 May 2023].
Heeren, N. and Hellweg, S. (2018), “Tracking Construction Material over Space and Time – Prospective and Geo-referenced Modeling of Building Stocks and Construction Material Flows”, in Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 23, issue 1, pp. 253-267. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12739 [Accessed 10 May 2023].
Ismail, Z.-A. B. (2022), “A critical study of the existing issues in circular economy practices during movement control order – Can BIM fill the gap?”, in Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, vol. ahead-of-print, n. ahead-of-print. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-08-2021-0676 [Accessed 10 May 2023].
Koutamanis, A., van Reijn, B. and van Bueren, E. (2018), “Urban mining and buildings – A review of possibilities and limitations”, in Resources Conservation and Recycling, vol. 138, pp. 32-39. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.06.024 [Accessed 10 May 2023].
Meža, S., Mauko Pranjić, A., Vezočnik, R., Osmokrović, I. and Lenart, S. (2021), “Digital Twins and Road Construction Using Secondary Raw Materials”, in Journal of Advanced Transportation, vol. 2021, article 8833058, pp. 1-12. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1155/2021/8833058 [Accessed 10 May 2023].
Pimponi, D. and Porcari, A. (2020), Circular economy in the building and construction sector in Italy – Towards sustainable production and consumption, SocKETs project. [Online] Available at: airi.it/airi2020/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/SocKETs_D1.1_Report_Airi_Final_Website.pdf [Accessed 10 May 2023].
Rigillo, M. and Giammetti, M. T. (2021), “Gestione del rifiuto da demolizione nel progetto di rigenerazione urbana | Management of the C&D waste in the urban regeneration project”, in Techne | Journal of Technology and Environment, vol. 22, pp. 240-248. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.36253/techne-10615 [Accessed 10 May 2023].
Russo Ermolli, S. (2020), The Digital Culture of Architecture – Note sul cambiamento cognitivo e tecnico tra continuità e rottura, Maggioli, Santarcangelo di Romagna (RN).
Schamne, A. N., Nagalli, A. and Vieira Soeiro, A. A. (2022), “The use of BIM to automated construction and demolition waste management – A literature review from 2009 to 2020”, in Revista Brasileira de Gestão Ambiental e Sustentabilidade, vol. 9, issue 21, pp. 377-394. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.21438/rbgas(2022)092124 [Accessed 10 May 2023].
Sposito, C. and Scalisi, F. (2020), “Ambiente costruito e sostenibilità – Materiali riciclati e Design for Disassembly tra ricerca e buone pratiche | Built environment and sustainability – Recycled materials and Design for Disassembly between research and good practices”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 8, pp. 106-117. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/8102020 [Accessed 10 May 2023].
Suciu, G., Petre, I., Iordache, G. V., Ionel, T. and Simionescu, S. (2022), “Classification algorithm of an automated sorting system for Construction and Demolition Waste materials”, in 21st RoEduNet Conference – Networking in Education and Research (RoEduNet), Sovata, September 15-16, 2022, pp. 1-4. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1109/RoEduNet57163.2022.9921053 [Accessed 10 May 2023].
Tiedemann, T., Keppner, M., Runge, T., Vögele, T., Wittmaier, M. and Wolff, S. (2021), “Concept of a Robotic System for Autonomous Coarse Waste Recycling”, in Gusikhin, O., Nijmeijer, H. and Madani, K. (eds), Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics (ICINCO 2021), July 6-8, 2021, ScitePress, Setúbal, pp. 493-500. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.5220/0010584004930500 [Accessed 10 May 2023].
UNI/PdR 75 (2020), Decostruzione selettiva – Metodologia per la decostruzione selettiva e il recupero dei rifiuti in un’ottica di economia circolare | Selective deconstruction – Methodology for selective deconstruction and waste recovery from a circular economy perspective. [Online] Available at: bauschutt.it/media/9af07049-6542-494a-9f3f-49a743d64595/uni21001058-eit.pdf [Accessed 10 May 2023].
Voorter, J. and Koolen, C. (2021), “The Traceability of Construction and Demolition Waste in Flanders via Blockchain Technology – A Match Made in Heaven?”, in Journal for European Environmental and Planning Law, vol. 18, issue 4, pp. 347-369. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1163/18760104-18040003 [Accessed 10 May 2023].
Xiao, J., Zou, S., Yu, Y., Wang, Y., Ding, T., Zhu, Y., Yu, J., Li, S., Duan, Z., Wu, Y. and Li, L. (2020), “3D recycled mortar printing – System development, process design, material properties and on-site printing”, in Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 32, article 101779, pp. 1-13. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101779 [Accessed 10 May 2023].
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Categorie
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2023 Marina Rigillo, Giuliano Galluccio, Federica Paragliola
TQuesto lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.
AGATHÓN è pubblicata sotto la licenza Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY).
License scheme | Legal code
Questa licenza consente a chiunque di:
Condividere: riprodurre, distribuire, comunicare al pubblico, esporre in pubblico, rappresentare, eseguire e recitare questo materiale con qualsiasi mezzo e formato.
Modificare: remixare, trasformare il materiale e basarti su di esso per le tue opere per qualsiasi fine, anche commerciale.
Alle seguenti condizioni
Attribuzione: si deve riconoscere una menzione di paternità adeguata, fornire un link alla licenza e indicare se sono state effettuate delle modifiche; si può fare ciò in qualsiasi maniera ragionevole possibile, ma non con modalità tali da suggerire che il licenziante avalli l'utilizzatore o l'utilizzo del suo materiale.
Divieto di restrizioni aggiuntive: non si possono applicare termini legali o misure tecnologiche che impongano ad altri soggetti dei vincoli giuridici su quanto la licenza consente di fare.
Note
Non si è tenuti a rispettare i termini della licenza per quelle componenti del materiale che siano in pubblico dominio o nei casi in cui il nuovo utilizzo sia consentito da una eccezione o limitazione prevista dalla legge.
Non sono fornite garanzie. La licenza può non conferire tutte le autorizzazioni necessarie per l'utilizzo che ci si prefigge. Ad esempio, diritti di terzi come i diritti all'immagine, alla riservatezza e i diritti morali potrebbero restringere gli usi del materiale.
