The sleeping giant. Project for the former Military Hospital in Naples
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/7142020Keywords:
urban project, inter-scaling, geography, huge artefacts, architectural cornerstonesAbstract
The paper aims to describe a project developed under the scientific cooperation agreement between the Department for the Urban Planning and Territorial Management (UNESCO Site of the Municipality of Naples) and DiARC (Department of Architecture) of the ‘Federico II’ University of Naples. The project concerns a huge Convent Complex with an open courtyard typology, placed on the slope of the Sant’Elmo hill in Naples that is, today, abandoned. The aim is of re-introducing the Complex in the living dynamic of the city, through a careful work not only on the artefact in itself but also on its relationship with the city and landscape. Moreover, the project is the occasion to affirm a convinced choice of field about the theme of the intervention on the heritage, in favour of the culture of project and against an obstinate, as myopic, logic of conservation.
Downloads
Article Metrics Graph
References
Bisogni, S. (ed.) (1994), Napoli: Montecalvario questione aperta – Teorie, analisi, progetti, Clean, Napoli.
Caniggia, G. (1997), Ragionamenti di tipologia – Operatività della tipologia processuale in architettura, Alinea, Firenze.
Capozzi, R. (ed.) (2019), Il contributo e l’eredità di Salvatore Bisogni, 01 FAM Quaderni, Festival Architettura Edizioni, Parma. [Online] Available at: re.public.polimi.it/retrieve/handle/11311/1124466/476573/2019_ Bisogni%20FAM%20Quaderni_NERI.pdf [Accessed 5 March 2020].
Carta, M. and Lino, B. (2015), Urban hyper-metabolism, Aracne, Roma.
D’Agostino, A. (2017), Monumenti in movimento – Scenari di città, LetteraVentidue, Siracusa.
D’Agostino, A., Longo, F. and Pagano, L. (eds) (1995), Napoli – Sistemi di spazialità urbana, Alfredo Guida Editore, Napoli.
De Fusco, R. (1994), Napoli nel Novecento, ElectaNapoli, Napoli.
De Fusco, R. (1992), Dentro e fuori l’architettura – Scritti brevi (1960-1990), Jaca Book, Milano.
De Fusco, R. (1988), Storia dell’architettura contemporanea, Laterza, Roma-Bari.
Gasparrini, C., Pavia, R. and Secchi, R. (eds) (2014), Il territorio degli scarti e dei rifiuti, Aracne, Roma.
Gregotti, V. (1984), “Modificazione”, in Casabella, n. 498-499, pp. 2-7.
Marini, S. and Corbellini, G. (eds) (2016), Recycled Theory – Dizionario illustrato | Illustrated Dictionary, Quodlibet, Macerata.
Marzot, N. (2017), “Dalla società dello spettacolo allo spettacolo della società – La rigenerazione urbana come pratica di rivendicazione del dismesso | From the society of the spectacle to spectacle of the society – The urban regeneration as reclamation of the dismess”, in FAMagazine, n. 42, pp. 63-79. [Online] Available at: www.famagazine.it/index.php/famagazine/article/view/60/267 [Accessed 21 April 2020].
Moccia, C. (2012), Architetture 2000-2010, Aión Edizioni, Firenze.
Piperata, G. (2017), “Rigenerare i beni e gli spazi della città: attori, regole e azioni”, in Fontanari, E. and Piperata, G. (eds), Agenda RE-CYCLE – Proposte per reinventare la città, Il Mulino, Bologna, pp. 21-38.
Rossi, A. (1987), L’architettura della città, CittàStudi, Milano.
Rossi, A. (1982), The Architecture of the City, The MIT Press, Cambridge and London.
Savarese, L. (1991), Il centro antico di Napoli – Analisi delle trasformazioni urbane, ElectaNapoli, Napoli.
Visconti, F. (2017), Pompeji – Città moderna | Moderne Stadt, Ernst Wasmuth Verlag, Tübingen/Berlin.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This Journal is published under Creative Commons Attribution Licence 4.0 (CC-BY).
License scheme | Legal code
This License allows anyone to:
Share: copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt: remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms
Attribution: Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made; users may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.
No additional restrictions: Users may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices
Users do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give users all of the permissions necessary for their intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.