Analogue-digital dialectics in architectural design. Towards renewed hypotheses of method

  • Giuseppe Canestrino University of Calabria (Italy)
Keywords: analogue, digital, continuous, discrete, architecture project


The dichotomy between analogue and digital influences the methods of design, production, construction, as well as the formal horizons of architecture. This dichotomy is apparently only related to the contemporary situation in which architecture is thought, built, and managed in increasingly computerised ways, and is consequently distanced from its more concrete aspects. However, a deep understanding of the meanings of analogue and digital reveals a dialectical relationship that can be looked to in order to renew aspects of the method of architectural design.

Author Biography

Giuseppe Canestrino, University of Calabria (Italy)

Building Engineer-Architect, he is a PhD Candidate in Architectural and Urban Design at the University of Calabria (Italy) with which he has already collaborated in funded and published research projects on sustainable architecture. He carries out research and teaching activities in the borderland between architectural design and ‘digital culture’ with both a practical and a critical-theoretical approach.


AIA – American Institute of Architects (2020), The Business of Architecture – Firm Survey Report. [Online] Available at: [Accessed 17 September 2021].

Cache, B. (1995), Earth moves – The furnishing of territories, The MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).

Canestrino, G. (2021), “Considerations on Optimization as an Architectural Design Tool”, in Nexus Network Journal, vol. 23, pp. 919-931. [Online] Available at: [Accessed 14 October 2021].

Carpo, M. (2017), The Second Digital Turn – Design Beyond Intelligence, The MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).

Carpo, M. (ed.) (2013), The Digital Turn in Architecture 1992-2012, Wiley, Hoboken.

Carpo, M. (2011), The Alphabet and the Algorithm, The MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).

De Fusco, R. (2001), “Internet non s’addice all’architettura”, in Op.Cit., n. 112, pp. 5-13. [Online] Available at: [Accessed 19 October 2021].

De Landa, M. (2002), “Deleuze and the use of the genetic algorithm in architecture”, in Architectural Design, vol. 72, issue 1, pp. 9-13.

Deleuze, G. (1993), The Fold – Leibniz and the Baroque, The Athlone, London.

Fankhänel, T. and Lepik, A. (eds) (2020), The Architecture Machine – The Role of Computers in Architecture, Birkhäuser, Basil.

Frazer, J. (1995), An Evolutionary Architecture, Architectural Association, London.

Gerber, R. (2014), BIM Design – Realising the Creative Potential of Building Information Modelling, Wiley, Hoboken.

Gershenfeld, N., Carney, M., Jenett, B., Calisch, S. and Wilson, S. (2015), “Macrofabrication with Digital Materials – Robotic Assembly”, in Architectural Design, vol. 85, issue 5, pp. 122-127. [Online] Available at: [Accessed 16 October 2021].

Leach, N. (2019), “There Is No Such Thing as a Digital Building – A Critique of the Discrete”, in Architectural Design, vol. 89, issue 2, pp. 136-141. [Online] Available at: [Accessed 16 October 2021].

Leach, N. (2018), “We Have Never Been Digital”, in Anzalone, P., del Signore, M. and Wit, A. J. (eds), Recalibration – On Imprecision and Infidelity – Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture, IngramSpark, pp. 20-29.

Longo, G. O. (2016), “La nascita della filosofia digitale”, in Doppiozero, 27/12/2016. [Online] Available at: [Accessed 17 October 2021].

Lynn, G. (ed.) (2013), Archaeology of the Digital, Sternberg Press, Berlin.

McLuhan, M. (2015), Gli strumenti del comunicare, Il Saggiatore, Milano.

Pask, G. (1969), “The Architectural Relevance of Cybernetics”, in Architectural Design, issue 7/6, pp. 494-496.

Prestinenza Puglisi, L. (1998), HyperArchitettura – Spazi nell’età dell’elettronica, Testo & Immagine, Torino.

Purini, F. (2018), “Il BIM – Un parere in evoluzione”, in Op. Cit., n. 162, pp. 5-16. [Online] Available at: [Accessed 24 October 2021].

Purini, F. (2003), “Digital Divide”, in Sacchi, L. and Unali, M. (eds), Architettura e Cultura Digitale, Skira, Milano, pp. 87-96.

Quaroni, L. (2001), Progettare un edificio – Otto lezioni di architettura, Edizioni Kappa, Roma.

Retsin, G. (2019), “Discrete Architecture in the Age of Automation”, in Architectural Design, vol. 89, issue 2, pp. 6-13. [Online] Available at: [Accessed 16 October 2021].

Retsin, G. (2016), “Discrete and Digital – A Discrete Paradigm for Design and Production”, in Bieg, K. (ed.), 2016 TxA Emerging Design + Technology Conference Proceedings, Texas Society of Architects, pp. 82-96. [Online] Available at: [Accessed 24 October 2021].

Rocker, I. M. (2006), “Calculus-based form – An interview with Greg Lynn”, in Architectural Design, vol. 76, issue 4, pp. 88-95. [Online] Available at: [Accessed 17 September 2021].

Saggio, A. (2007), Introduzione alla rivoluzione informatica in architettura, Carocci, Roma.

Simmel, G. (2020), “Ponte e porta”, in Carnevali, B. and Pinotti, A. (eds), George Simmel – Stile Moderno – Saggi di estetica sociale, Einaudi, Torino, pp. 321-328.

Thompson, D. W. (1945), On growth and form, University Press, Cambridge.

Ungers, O. M. (1982), Architettura come tema | Architecture as theme, Electa, Milano.

Zevi, B. (1973), Il linguaggio moderno dell’architettura – Guida al codice anticlassico, Einaudi, Torino.

Universal Constructor by John Frazer, developed with Architectural Association Diploma Unit 11 (source: Frazer, 1995). AGATHÓN 10 | 2021
How to Cite
Canestrino, G. (2021) “Analogue-digital dialectics in architectural design. Towards renewed hypotheses of method”, AGATHÓN | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, 10(online), pp. 56-67. doi: 10.19229/2464-9309/1052021.
Architecture | Essays & Viewpoint
Share |