Human-de-centred Design – Towards a (new) era of suffering
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/16212024Keywords:
posthumanism, post-Anthropocene, speculative design, non-human agents, sufferingAbstract
To tackle the global challenges of the Anthropocene, this paper proposes the concept of Human-de-centred Design, a new design approach aimed at decisively moving beyond Human-centred Design. Positioned as a stronger alternative to similar attempts from the posthumanism field, this new paradigm promotes a vision in which the needs of ‘non-human agents’ are prioritised. This leads to a proactive removal of the user from the centre of the design process, requiring that human interests be subordinated to the ecosystem’s needs. To achieve this post-anthropocentric revolution, the concept of the ‘era of suffering’ is introduced, intended to highlight the efforts required from humanity. To illustrate this concept, three case studies are analysed, demonstrating how design can challenge traditional logic and adopt a more radical perspective that removes the human user from the centre of the project.
Article info
Received: 10/09/2024; Revised: 11/10/2024; Accepted: 14/10/2024
Downloads
Article Metrics Graph
References
American Bible Society (1986), The Holy Bible – Containing the Old and New Testaments – Translated Out of the Original Tongues and with the Former Translations Diligently Compared and Revised, American Bible Society, Philadelphia.
Braidotti, R. (2013), The posthuman, Polity, Cambridge. [Online] Available at: rosibraidotti.com/publications/the-posthuman-2/ [Accessed 26 September 2024].
Braidotti, R. and Hlavajova, M. (eds) (2018), Posthuman Glossary, Bloomsbury Publishing, London.
Brynjolfsson, E. and McAfee, A. (2011), Race against the machine – How the digital revolution is accelerating innovation, driving productivity, and irreversibly transforming employment and the economy, Digital Frontier Press, Lexington.
Casiddu, N. and Giulini, S. (2014), “La diminuzione dell’albedo terrestre – La proposta white cars e nuovi scenari urbani | Albedo decreasing trend – White cars proposal and new urban scenarios”, in DISEGNARECON, vol. 7, issue 13, pp. 1-9. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.6092/issn.1828-5961/4097 [Accessed 26 September 2024].
Colglazier, W. (2015), “Sustainable Development Agenda – 2030 – Building knowledge-based societies is key to transformative technologies”, in Science, vol. 349, issue 6252, pp. 1048-1050. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1126/science.aad2333 [Accessed 26 September 2024].
Coombs, G., McNamara, A. and Sade, G. (eds) (2019), Undesign – Critical practices at the Intersection of Art and Design, Routledge, London. [Online] Available at: routledge.com/Undesign-Critical-Practices-at-the-Intersection-of-Art-and-Design/Coombs-McNamara-Sade/p/book/9781138695719?srsltid=AfmBOooxCMWCDyI62UYOX49 SiXXhHAgtBJK0Wv2nQOHWindeNNJ8S6_n [Accessed 26 September 2024].
Davidová, M., Barath, S. and Dickinson, S. (2023), “Ambienti culturali con prospettive non solo umane – Prototipazione attraverso ricerca e formazione | Cultural environments with more-than-human perspectives – Prototyping through research and training”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 13, pp. 165-178. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/13142023 [Accessed 26 September 2024].
de Saint-Exupéry, A. (1943), The Little Prince, Reynal & Hitchcock, New York.
Dostoevskij, F. (2014), L’idiota, Feltrinelli, Milano.
Dunne, A. and Raby, F. (2013), Speculative Everything – Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming, MIT Press, Cambridge.
European Commission (2021), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – New European Bauhaus Beautiful, Sustainable, Together, document 52021DC0573, COM/2021/573 final. [Online] Available at: eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52021DC0573&qid=1728591256345 [Accessed 26 September 2024].
European Parliament (2020), A New Industrial Strategy for Europe – European Parliament resolution of 25 November 2020 on a New Industrial Strategy for Europe, document 52020IP0321. [Online] Available at: eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020IP0321&qid=1728592205923 [Accessed 26 September 2024].
European Parliament and Council of the European Union (2024), Regulation (EU) 2024/1735 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 on establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Europe’s net-zero technology manufacturing ecosystem and amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1724, document 32024R1735, PE/45/2024/REV/1. [Online] Available at: eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-=CELEX%3A32024R1735&qid=1728590203587 [Accessed 26 September 2024].
Ferrando, F. (2017), “Postumanesimo, Transumanesimo, Antiumanesimo, Metaumanesimo e nuovo Materialismo – Relazioni e Differenze”, in Lo Sguardo | Rivista di filosofia, vol. 24, issue 2, pp. 51-61. [Online] Available at: losguardo.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/2017-24-Limiti-Confini-Postumano-Ebook.pdf [Accessed 26 September 2024].
Forlano, L. (2017), “Posthumanism and Design”, in She Ji | The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, vol. 3, issue 1, pp. 16-29. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2017.08.001 [Accessed 26 September 2024].
Foucault, M. (1977), Discipline and punish – The birth of the prison, Vintage Books, New York.
Forster, P. M., Smith, C. J., Walsh, T., Lamb, W. F., Lamboll, R., Hauser, M. et alii (2023), “Indicators of Global Climate Change 2022 – Annual update of large-scale indicators of the state of the climate system and human influence”, in Earth System Science Data, vol. 15, issue 6, pp. 2295-2327. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2295-2023 [Accessed 26 September 2024].
Francesco (2015), Laudato si’ – Lettera enciclica sulla cura della casa comune, Paoline Editoriale Libri, Roma.
Galimberti, U. (2023), L’etica del viandante, Feltrinelli, Milano.
Giaccardi, E. and Redström, J. (2020), “Technology and more-than-human design”, in Design Issues, vol. 36, issue 4, pp. 33-44. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00612 [Accessed 26 September 2024].
Gleick, P. H. (2010), “Climate change, exponential curves, water resources, and unprecedented threats to humanity”, in Climatic Change, vol. 100, pp. 125-129. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9831-8 [Accessed 26 September 2024].
Haraway, D. J. (2023), Manifesto delle specie compagne – Cani, persone e altri partner, Contrasto, Roma.
Haraway, D. J. (2019), Chthulucene – Sopravvivere su un Pianeta infetto, Produzioni Nero, Roma. [Online] Available at: neroeditions.com/product/chthulucene/ [Accessed 26 September 2024].
Harris, E. and Nowicki, M. (2020), “Get Smaller? Emerging geographies of micro-living”, in Area, vol. 52, issue 3, pp. 591-599. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1111/area.12625 [Accessed 26 September 2024].
Herzig, R. M. (2005), Suffering for Science – Reason and Sacrifice in Modern America, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick. [Online] Available at: rutgersuniversitypress.org/suffering-for-science/9780813539515/ [Accessed 26 September 2024].
Heskett, J. (2005), Design – A very short introduction, Oxford University Press, Oxford. [Online] Available at: academic.oup.com/book/790 [Accessed 26 September 2024].
Hodgetts, T. (2016), “How We Nose”, in Bastian, M., Jones, O., Moore, N. and Roe, E. (eds), Participatory Research in More-than-Human Worlds, Routledge, London, pp. 79-91. [Online] Available at: taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315661698-14/nose-timothy-hodgetts-hester [Accessed 26 September 2024].
Latouche, S. (2014), La scommessa della decrescita, Feltrinelli, Milano.
Lauria, M. and Azzalin, M. (2021), “Paradigmi | Paradigms”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 9, pp. 12-21. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/912021 [Accessed 26 September 2024].
Levi, C. (1945), Cristo si è fermato a Eboli, Einaudi, Firenze.
Loschiavo, D. (2021), “Big-city life (dis)satisfaction? The effect of urban living on subjective well-being”, in Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol. 192, pp. 740-764. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2021.10.028 [Accessed 26 September 2024].
Lovejoy, A. (2017), The great chain of being – A study of the history of an idea, Taylor and Francis, London.
Magnani, M. (2020), Fatti non foste a viver come robot – Crescita, lavoro, sostenibilità – Sopravvivere alla rivoluzione tecnologica (e alla pandemia), Utet, Milano.
Monteiro, M. (2019), Ruined by Design – How designers destroyed the world, and what we can do to fix it, Mule Design.
Morace, F. and Tomasin, M. (2022), L’alfabeto della sostenibilità – 26 modi di essere sostenibili, EGEA, Milano.
Ness, D. (2021), “Dalla nuova edilizia alla rigenerazione – Può il Nuovo Bauhaus ridefinire l’architettura e dare risposte ai cambiamenti globali? | The shift from new build to regeneration – Can the New Bauhaus transform architecture and design to meet global challenges?”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture Art and Design, vol. 9, pp. 22-31. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/922021 [Accessed 26 September 2024].
Nicenboim, I., Oogjes, D., Biggs, H. and Nam, S. (2023), “Decentering Through Design – Bridging Posthuman Theory with More-than-Human Design Practices”, in Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 1-26. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2023.2283535 [Accessed 26 September 2024].
Noorani, T. and Brigstocke, J. (2018), More-than-human participatory research, University of Bristol and AHRC Connected Community Programme, Bristol. [Online] Available at: researchgate.net/publication/329586789_More-than-human_Participatory_Research [Accessed 26 September 2024].
Oppermann, S. and Iovino, S. (eds) (2014), Material Ecocriticism, Indiana University Press, Bloomington. [Online] Available at: iupress.org/9780253013989/material-ecocriticism/ [Accessed 26 September 2024].
Rogers, J. E. (1994), “Environmental leadership in a boundary-less world”, in Environmental Quality Management, vol. 4, issue 2, pp. 1-4. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1002/tqem.3310040202 [Accessed 26 September 2024].
Sandelin, E. (2024), Design and Grace – An Ahuman Odyssey, Konstfack, Hägersten. [Online] Available at: kth.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1860317/FULLTEXT01.pdf [Accessed 26 September 2024].
Teichman, D. and Zamir, E. (2022), “Exponential Growth Bias and the Law – Why Do We Save Too Little, Borrow Too Much, and Fail to React on Time to Deadly Pandemics and Climate Change”, in Vanderbilt Law Review, vol. 75, issue 5, pp. 1345-1400. [Online] Available at: cdn.vanderbilt.edu/vu-wordpress-0/wp-content/uploads/sites/278/2022/10/19121617/Exponential-Growth-Bias-and-the-Law.pdf [Accessed 26 September 2024].
UN – General Assembly (2015), Transforming our world – The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1), New York. [Online] Available at: sdgs.un.org/2030agenda [Accessed 26 September 2024].
UNEP-CCC – UNEP Copenhagen Climate Centre (2020), Emissions Gap Report 2020. [Online] Available at: unep.org/emissions-gap-report-2020 [Accessed 26 September 2024].
Vacanti, A., Burlando, F., Nevoso, I. and Menichinelli, M. (2023), “The More-Than-Human Trend in Design Research – A Literature Review”, in DIID | Disegno Industriale Industrial Design, issue DSI 1, pp. 80-89. [Online] Available at: diid.it/diid/index.php/diid/issue/view/diid-dsi-1/diid-dsi-1 [Accessed 26 September 2024].
Zannoni, M., Succini, L., Rosato, L. and Pasini, V. (2024), “Transitional industrial designer – La responsabilità di progettisti e imprese per una transizione sostenibile | Transitional industrial designer – The responsibility of designers and companies for a sustainable transition”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 15, pp. 332-343. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/15282024 [Accessed 26 September 2024].
Zeschky, M., Widenmayer, B. and Gassmann, O. (2011), “Frugal innovation in emerging markets”, in Research-Technology Management, vol. 54, issue 4, pp. 38-45. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.5437/08956308X5404007 [Accessed 26 September 2024].
Zilli, S. (2022), “L’innovazione sostenibile rivoluziona il concetto di sviluppo economico”, in Quaderni di Comunità | Persone, Educazione e Welfare nella Società 5.0, vol. 3, pp. 73-78. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.61007/QdC.2022.3.92 [Accessed 26 September 2024].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Niccolò Casiddu, Francesco Burlando, Boyu Chen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This Journal is published under Creative Commons Attribution Licence 4.0 (CC-BY).
License scheme | Legal code
This License allows anyone to:
Share: copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt: remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms
Attribution: Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made; users may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.
No additional restrictions: Users may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices
Users do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give users all of the permissions necessary for their intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
