Monitoraggio dello stato umano nella formazione marittima – Il caso On Watch
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69143/2464-9309/19302026Parole chiave:
formazione marittima per la sicurezza, monitoraggio dello stato umano, governance dei dati, tecnologie digitali, monitoraggio multimodaleAbstract
Nei domini critici per la sicurezza la formazione è un’infrastruttura socio-tecnica (spazi, interfacce, procedure e fasi di preparazione e di riesame finale) che sostiene l’apprendimento e la cultura della sicurezza. In questa prospettiva il paper propone il quadro operativo del Designer-in-the-Loop (DITL) per introdurre gli Human State Monitoring Systems (HSMS) nella formazione marittima, rendendo verificabili i compromessi tra innovazione digitale e rischi di sorveglianza, distorsioni e disuguaglianze. In tale quadro, On Watch è assunto come caso di studio poiché consente di sperimentare operativamente il framework in un contesto applicativo concreto, integrando segnali multimodali e traducendoli in indicatori probabilistici non prescrittivi, privi di graduatorie e di automatismi decisionali, a supporto del riesame finale. Una sperimentazione pilota, articolata in tre contesti – ECDIS, plancia cooperativa e colloquio – valuta la fattibilità, l’utilità e l’accettabilità mediante indicatori chiave di prestazione tecnico-operativi e socio-distributivi replicabili.
Info sull'articolo
Ricevuto: 09/03/2026; Revisionato: 15/04/2026; Accettato: 17/04/2026
Downloads
##plugins.generic.articleMetricsGraph.articlePageHeading##
Riferimenti bibliografici
Aguinis, H. and Kraiger, K. (2009), “Benefits of Training and Development for Individuals and Teams, Organizations, and So-ciety”, in Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 60, pp. 451-474. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163505 [Accessed 28 March 2026].
Ajunwa, I., Crawford, K. and Schultz, J. M. (2017), “Limitless Worker Surveillance”, in California Law Review, vol. 105, pp. 735-776. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.15779/Z38BR8MF94 [Accessed 28 March 2026].
Arquilla, V. and Caruso, C. (2025), “Un approccio di integrazione nativa dell’inclusione nel meta-design – L’esperienza COmeta | Towards native integration of inclusivity in meta-design – The COmeta experience”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 17, pp. 360-373. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.69143/2464-9309/17252025 [Accessed 28 March 2026].
Arquilla, V. and Paracolli, A. (2023), “Design sull’esperienza dell’utente e sostenibilità degli oggetti con intelligenza artifi-ciale | User experience design and sustainability of AI-infused objects”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 13, pp. 259-268. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/13222023 [Accessed 28 March 2026].
Buolamwini, J. and Gebru, T. (2018), “Gender Shades – Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classifica-tion”, in Friedler, S. A. and Wilson, C. (eds), Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transpar-ency, New York, NY, USA, February 23-24, 2018, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, vol. 81, pp. 77-91. [Online] Available at: proceedings.mlr.press/v81/buolamwini18a.html [Accessed 28 March 2026].
Cheng, A., Eppich, W., Grant, V., Sherbino, J., Zendejas, B. and Cook, D. A. (2014), “Debriefing for technology-enhanced sim-ulation – A systematic review and meta-analysis”, in Medical Education, vol. 48, issue 7, pp. 657-666. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1111/medu.12432 [Accessed 28 March 2026].
D’Mello, S. K. and Kory, J. (2015), “A Review and Meta-Analysis of Multimodal Affect Detection Systems”, in ACM Compu-ting Surveys, vol. 47, issue 3, article 43, pp. 1-36. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1145/2682899 [Accessed 28 March 2026].
Endsley, M. R. (1995), “Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems”, in Human Factors | The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, vol. 37, issue 1, pp. 32-64. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049543 [Accessed 28 March 2026].
Eurofound (2020), Employee monitoring and surveillance – The challenges of digitalisation, Publications Office of the Eu-ropean Union, Luxembourg. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.2806/424580 [Accessed 28 March 2026].
European Union (2024), Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 lay-ing down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending Regulations (EC) No 300/2008, (EU) No 167/2013, (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU, (EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Artificial Intelligence Act) (Text with EEA relevance), document 32024R1689. [Online] Available at: da-ta.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj [Accessed 28 March 2026].
European Union (2016), Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (Text with EEA relevance), document 32016R0679. [Online] Available at: data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj [Accessed 28 March 2026].
Fanning, R. M. and Gaba, D. M. (2007), “The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning”, in Simulation in Healthcare | Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, vol. 2, issue 2, pp. 115-125. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e3180315539 [Accessed 28 March 2026].
Gazzaniga, M. S. (2005), “Forty-five years of split-brain research and still going strong”, in Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 6, issue 8, pp. 653-659. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1038/nrn1723 [Accessed 28 March 2026].
Hancock, P. A. and Matthews, G. (2019), “Workload and Performance – Associations, Insensitivities, and Dissociations”, in Human Factors, vol. 61, issue 3, pp. 374-392. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1177/0018720818809590 [Accessed 28 March 2026].
Hart, S. G. and Staveland, L. E. (1988), “Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index) – Results of Empirical and Theoreti-cal Research”, in Hancock, P. A. and Meshkati, N. (eds), Human Mental Workload, North-Holland, Oxford, pp. 139-183. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9 [Accessed 28 March 2026].
ISO – International Organization for Standardization (2019), ISO 9241-210:2019 – Ergonomics of human-system interac-tion – Part 210 – Human-centred design for interactive systems. [Online] Available at: org/standard/77520.html [Accessed 28 March 2026].
Koelstra, S., Mühl, C., Soleymani, M., Lee, J.-S., Yazdani, A., Ebrahimi, T., Pun, T., Nijholt, A. and Patras, I. (2012), “DEAP – A Database for Emotion Analysis – Using Physiological Signals”, in IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, vol. 3, issue 1, pp. 18-31. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1109/T-AFFC.2011.15 [Accessed 28 March 2026].
Liu, Y., Lan, Z., Cui, J., Krishnan, G., Sourina, O., Konovessis, D., Ang, H. E. and Mueller-Wittig, W. (2020), “Psychophysio-logical evaluation of seafarers to improve training in maritime virtual simulator”, in Advanced Engineering Informatics, vol. 44, article 101048, pp. 1-9. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2020.101048 [Accessed 28 March 2026].
MIM – Ministero dell’Istruzione e del Merito (2025), JOB&Orienta 2025 – Programma del Ministero dell’Istruzione e del Merito. [Online] Available at: mim.gov.it/documents/20182/8952594/Job%26Orienta%2B2025%2B-%2BProgramma%2Bdel%2BMinistero%2Bdell%27Istruzione%2Be%2Bdel%2B Merito.pdf/def37280-0067-4a6b-b1cc-09bdc31897ba?t=1764260799177&version=1.1 [Accessed 28 March 2026].
Mittelstadt, B. (2019), “Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI”, in Nature Machine Intelligence, vol. 1, issue 11, pp. 501-507. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0114-4 [Accessed 28 March 2026].
NIST – National Institute of Standards and Technology (2023), Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) – NIST AI 100-1. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1 [Accessed 28 March 2026].
OECD (2019), Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence. [Online] Available at: one.oecd.org/document/C/MIN(2019)3/FINAL/en [Accessed 28 March 2026].
Osello, A. Ugliotti, F. M., Rimella, N. and Loddo, F. (2024), “Modelli digitali e linguaggio naturale – Nuove prospettive per interpretare la complessità | Digital models and natural language – New perspectives for interpreting complexity”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 16, pp. 212-219. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/16182024 [Accessed 28 March 2026].
Parasuraman, R. and Riley, V. (1997), “Humans and Automation – Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse”, in Human Factors | The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, vol. 39, issue 2, pp. 230-253. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1518/001872097778543886 [Accessed 28 March 2026].
Picard, R. W. (1997), Affective Computing, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1140.001.0001 [Accessed 28 March 2026].
Porfirione, C., Ferrari Tumay, X. and Leggiero, I (2024), “Conoscenza, innovazione e cambiamento – Il potere dell’errore nel design e nei sistemi complessi | Knowledge, innovation, and change – The power of error in design and complex systems”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 16, pp. 232-241. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/16202024 [Accessed 28 March 2026].
Poria, S., Cambria, E., Bajpai, R. and Hussain, A. (2017), “A review of affective computing – From unimodal analysis to mul-timodal fusion”, in Information Fusion, vol. 37, pp. 98-125. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2017.02.003 [Accessed 28 March 2026].
Raji, I. D. and Buolamwini, J. (2019), “Actionable Auditing – Investigating the Impact of Publicly Naming Biased Perfor-mance Results of Commercial AI Products”, in Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (AIES ’19), Honolulu, HI, USA, January 27-29, 2019, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, pp. 429-435. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1145/3306618.3314244 [Accessed 28 March 2026].
Ronca, V., Uflaz, E., Turan, O., Bantan, H., MacKinnon, S. N., Lommi, A., Pozzi, S., Kurt, R. E., Arslan, O., Kurt, Y. B., Erdem, P., Akyuz, E., Vozzi, A., Di Flumeri, G., Aricò, P., Giorgi, A., Capotorto, R., Babiloni, F. and Borghini, G. (2023), “Neurophys-iological Assessment of An Innovative Maritime Safety System in Terms of Ship Operators’ Mental Workload, Stress, and At-tention in the Full Mission Bridge Simulator”, in Brain Sciences, vol. 13, issue 9, article 1319, pp. 1-19. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13091319 [Accessed 28 March 2026].
Rosmino, A. (2024), “Corpi, menti e design – Un approccio integrato per l’innovazione museale | Bodies, minds, and design – An integrated approach to museum innovation”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 16, pp. 278-289. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/16232024 [Accessed 28 March 2026].
Rudolph, J. W., Simon, R., Dufresne, R. L. and Raemer, D. B. (2006), “There’s no such thing as ‘nonjudgmental’ debriefing – A theory and method for debriefing with good judgment”, in Simulation in Healthcare | Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, vol. 1, issue 1, pp. 49-55. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1097/01266021-200600110-00006 [Accessed 28 March 2026].
Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K. and Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2012), “The Science of Training and Development in Organi-zations – What Matters in Practice”, in Psychological Science in the Public Interest, vol. 13, issue 2, pp. 74-101. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1177/1529100612436661 [Accessed 28 March 2026].
Vacanti, A., De Chirico, M., Crippa, D. and Fagnoni, R. (2025), “Temporalità digitale – La responsabilità dell’Interaction De-sign nell’alienazione digitale | Digital temporality – The responsibility of Interaction Design in digital alienation”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 17, pp. 336-347. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.69143/2464-9309/17232025 [Accessed 28 March 2026].
Villani, T., Romagna, G. and Oddi, A. (2024), “Ottimizzare la fruibilità nei musei – Gestione integrata di dati sui modi d’uso dello spazio e dei contenuti culturali | Optimising usability in museums – Integrated management of data on the use of space and cultural content”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 16, pp. 220-231. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/16192024 [Accessed 28 March 2026].
Wulvik, A. S., Dybvik, H. and Steinert, M. (2020), “Investigating the relationship between mental state (workload and affect) and physiology in a control room setting (ship bridge simulator)”, in Cognition, Technology & Work, vol. 22, issue 1, pp. 95-108. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1007/s10111-019-00553-8 [Accessed 28 March 2026].
Xue, H., Haugseggen, Ø., Røds, J.-F., Batalden, B.-M. and Prasad, D. K. (2024), “Assessment of stress levels based on biosignal during the simulator-based maritime navigation training and its impact on sailing route reliability”, in Transportation Re-search Interdisciplinary Perspectives, vol. 24, article 101047, pp. 1-14. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2024.101047 [Accessed 28 March 2026].
Zehr Gantz, S., Massari, S., McDonagh, D. and Vokoun, J. (2025), “Affrontare l’insicurezza alimentare – Empatia e Design Thinking per l’apprendimento trasformativo | Addressing food insecurity – Leveraging empathy and Design Thinking to achieve transformative learning”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 17, pp. 384-397. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.69143/2464-9309/17272025 [Accessed 28 March 2026].
Zeng, Z., Pantic, M., Roisman, G. I. and Huang, T. S. (2009), “A Survey of Affect Recognition Methods – Audio, Visual, and Spontaneous Expressions”, in IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 31, issue 1, pp. 39-58. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2008.52 [Accessed 28 March 2026].
Zuboff, S. (2019), The Age of Surveillance Capitalism – The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power, Publi-cAffairs, New York. [Online] Available at: hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=56791 [Accessed 28 March 2026].
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Categorie
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2026 Mario Ivan Zignego, Alessandro Bertirotti, Paolo Gemelli, Laura Pagani
TQuesto lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.
AGATHÓN è pubblicata sotto la licenza Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY).
License scheme | Legal code
Questa licenza consente a chiunque di:
Condividere: riprodurre, distribuire, comunicare al pubblico, esporre in pubblico, rappresentare, eseguire e recitare questo materiale con qualsiasi mezzo e formato.
Modificare: remixare, trasformare il materiale e basarti su di esso per le tue opere per qualsiasi fine, anche commerciale.
Alle seguenti condizioni
Attribuzione: si deve riconoscere una menzione di paternità adeguata, fornire un link alla licenza e indicare se sono state effettuate delle modifiche; si può fare ciò in qualsiasi maniera ragionevole possibile, ma non con modalità tali da suggerire che il licenziante avalli l'utilizzatore o l'utilizzo del suo materiale.
Divieto di restrizioni aggiuntive: non si possono applicare termini legali o misure tecnologiche che impongano ad altri soggetti dei vincoli giuridici su quanto la licenza consente di fare.
Note
Non si è tenuti a rispettare i termini della licenza per quelle componenti del materiale che siano in pubblico dominio o nei casi in cui il nuovo utilizzo sia consentito da una eccezione o limitazione prevista dalla legge.
Non sono fornite garanzie. La licenza può non conferire tutte le autorizzazioni necessarie per l'utilizzo che ci si prefigge. Ad esempio, diritti di terzi come i diritti all'immagine, alla riservatezza e i diritti morali potrebbero restringere gli usi del materiale.
