Innovazione rurale, servizi eco-sistemici e processi di urbanizzazione in Liguria, tra costa ed entroterra
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/13172023Parole chiave:
servizi ecosistemici, urbanizzazione costiera, innovazione rurale, morfologia spaziale, multifunzionalità ecosistemicaAbstract
Lo sfruttamento delle risorse ambientali e i processi di urbanizzazione hanno alterato in modo significativo gli ecosistemi naturali, trasformandoli nel tempo in sistemi socio-ecologici fortemente influenzati dalla presenza degli insediamenti antropici. La pianificazione territoriale deve dunque puntare a nuovi modelli di sviluppo in grado di coniugare le esigenze di conservazione delle componenti ambientali e quelle di riduzione delle disuguaglianze socio-economiche, spesso legate all’iniqua accessibilità ai servizi ecosistemici. Si presenta il caso studio della Regione Liguria, caratterizzata da una forte polarizzazione tra conurbazione lineare costiera ed entroterra. Questa struttura territoriale è alla base di una rilevante distinzione tra le aree che forniscono la maggior parte dei servizi ecosistemici e quelle a più alta densità di popolazione e di urbanizzazione, che invece si configurano come grandi poli di domanda. Il presente lavoro analizza la relazione tra i valori ambientali, in termini di multifunzionalità ecosistemica, e le forme di innovazione rurale che contribuiscono a sostenere la competitività territoriale. L’obiettivo è quello di esplorare come un approccio sistemico possa favorire le opportunità di integrazione tra aree interne e costiere, qualificando i sistemi vallivi come nuove componenti della struttura antropico-ambientale della regione.
Info sull'articolo
Ricevuto: 21/03/2023; Revisionato: 27/04/2023; Accettato: 05/05/2023
Downloads
##plugins.generic.articleMetricsGraph.articlePageHeading##
Riferimenti bibliografici
Alberti, M. (2018), Cities That Think Like Planets – Complexity, Resilience, and Innovation in Hybrid Ecosystems, Washington University Press, Washington. [Online] Available at: jstor.org/stable/j.ctvcwn7jm [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Asheim, B. T. and Coenen, L. (2005), “Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems – Comparing Nordic clusters”, in Research Policy, vol. 34, issue 8, pp. 1173-1190. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.013 [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Balzan, M. V., Caruana, J. and Zammit, A. (2018), “Assessing the capacity and flow of ecosystem services in multifunctional landscapes – Evidence of a rural-urban gradient in a Mediterranean small island state”, in Land Use Policy, vol. 75, pp. 711-725. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.08.025 [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Bauman, Z. (2020), Retrotopia, Laterza, Roma-Bari.
Bomans, K., Steenberghen, T., Dewaelheyns, V., Leinfelder, H. and Gulinck, H. (2010), “Underrated transformations in the open space – The case of an urbanized and multifunctional area”, in Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 94, issues 3-4, pp. 196-205. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.10.004 [Accessed 22 March 2023]
Botzas-Coluni, J., Crockett, E. T. H., Rieb, J. T. and Bennett, E. M. (2021), “Farmland heterogeneity is associated with gains in some ecosystem services but also potential trade-offs”, in Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, vol. 322, article 107661, pp. 1-12. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107661 [Accessed 22 March 2023]
Budyko, M. I. and Miller, D. H. (1975), “Climate and Life”, in Journal of Range Management JSTOR, vol. 28, issue 2, p. 160. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.2307/3897455 [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Canzanelli, G. and Loffredo, L. (2008), “Territorial systems for innovation – Hypotesis for the human development programs”, in ILS LEDA International Link and Services for Local Economic Development Agencies, n. 10, pp. 1-16. [Online] Available at: ilsleda.org/en/papers/paper/territorial-systems-for-innovation-hypotesis-for-the-human-development-programs.html [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Chapin, F. S., Woodwell, G. M., Randerson, J. T., Rastetter, E. B., Lovett, G. M., Baldocchi, D. D., Clark, D. A., Harmon, M. E., Schimel, D. S., Valentini, R., Wirth, C., Aber, J. D., Cole, J. J., Goulden, M. L., Harden, J. W., Heimann, M., Howarth, R. W., Matson, P. A., McGuire, A. D. and Schulze, E. D. (2006), “Reconciling carbon-cycle concepts, terminology, and methods”, in Ecosystems, vol. 9, issue 7, pp. 1041-1050. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1007/s10021-005-0105-7 [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Cortinovis, C. and Geneletti, D. (2020), “A performance-based planning approach integrating supply and demand of urban ecosystem services”, in Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 201, article 103842, pp. 1-14. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103842 [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Danese, M., Lazzari M. and Murgante, B. (2008), “Kernel density estimation methods for a geostatistical approach in seismic risk analysis – The case study of Potenza hilltop town (Southern Italy)”, in Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Laganà, A., Taniar, D., Mun, Y. and Gavrilova, M. L. (eds), Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2008 – Proceedings of the International Conference ICCSA 2008, Perugia, Italy, June 30-July 3, 2008 – Part I – Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5072, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 415-429. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69839-5_3 [Accessed 22 March 2023].
De Falco, S. (2017), Le città nella geografia dell’innovazione globale, FrancoAngeli, Milano.
European Commission (2020), Europe 2020 – A European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. [Online] Available at: ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/COMPLET%20EN%20BARROSO%20%20%20007%20-%20Europe%202020%20-%20EN%20version.pdf [Accessed 22 March 2023].
European Commission (2003), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – Innovation policy – Updating the Union’s approach in the context of the Lisbon strategy, document 52003AE1175. [Online] Available at: eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52003AE1175 [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Fanfani, D. and Matarán Ruiz, A. (eds) (2021), Bioregional Planning and Design – Volume I, Springer, Cham. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45870-6 [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Garland, G., Banerjee, S., Edlinger, A., Oliveira, E. M., Herzog, C., Wittwer, R., Philippot, L., Maestre, F. T. and van der Heijden, M. G. A. (2021), “A closer look at the functions behind ecosystem multifunctionality – A review”, in Journal of Ecology, vol. 109, issue 2, pp. 600-613. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13511 [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Gould, S. J. and Vrba, E. S. (2008), Exaptation – Il bricolage dell’evoluzione, Bollati Boringheri, Torino.
Haines-Young, R. and Potschin, M. (2018), Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V5.1 – Guidance on the Application of the Revised Structure, Fabis Consulting Ltd., Nottingham. [Online] Available at: cices.eu/content/uploads/sites/8/2018/01/Guidance-V51-01012018.pdf [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Huang, F., Zuo, L., Gao, J., Jiang, Y., Du, F., Zhang, Y. (2023), “Exploring the driving factors of trade-offs and synergies among ecological functional zones based on ecosystem service bundles”, in Ecological Indicators, vol. 146, article 109827, pp. 1-12. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109827 [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Isola, F., Lai, S., Leone, F. and Zoppi, C. (2022), “Strengthening a Regional Green Infrastructure through Improved Multifunctionality and Connectedness – Policy Suggestions from Sardinia, Italy”, in Sustainability, vol. 14, issue 15, article 9788, pp. 1-22. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.3390/su14159788 [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Lacy, P., Long, J. and Spindler, W. (2020), The Circular Economy Handbook – Realizing the Circular Advantage, Palgrave Macmillan, London. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95968-6 [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Lapointe, M., Gurney G. G. and Cumming, G. S. (2021), “Urbanization affects how people perceive and benefit from ecosystem service bundles in coastal communities of the Global South”, in Ecosystems and People, vol. 17, issue 1, pp. 57-68. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2021.1890226 [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Li, S., Shao, Y., Hong, M., Zhu, C., Dong, B., Li, Y., Lin, Y., Wang, K., Gan, M., Zhu, J., Zhang, L., Lin, N. and Zhang, J. (2023), “Impact mechanisms of urbanization processes on supply-demand matches of cultivated land multifunction in rapid urbanization areas”, in Habitat International, vol. 131, article 102726, pp. 1-12. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102726 [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Liu, C., Yang, M., Hou, Y. and Xue, X. (2021), “Ecosystem service multifunctionality assessment and coupling coordination analysis with land use and land cover change in China’s coastal zones”, in Science of The Total Environment, vol. 797, article 149033, pp. 1-16. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149033 [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Liu, J., Zhang, M., Xia, Y., Zheng, H. and Chen, C. (2022), “Using agent-based modeling to assess multiple strategy options and trade-offs for the sustainable urbanization of cultural landscapes – A case in Nansha, China”, in Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 228, article 104555, pp. 1-17. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104555 [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Lombardini, G. (2019), “Dai territori della resistenza alle comunità di patrimonio – Percorsi di autorganizzazione e autogoverno per le aree fragili – Introduzione”, in Butelli, E., Lombardini, G. and Rossi, M. (eds), Dai territori della resistenza alle comunità di patrimonio, SdT Edizioni, Firenze, pp. 8-27. [Online] Available at: societadeiterritorialisti.it/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/DI-PATRIMONIO.pdf [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Lombardini, G. (2018), “Geosimulation methods for settlement morphologies analysis and territorial development cycles”, in Leone, A. and Gargiulo, C. (eds), Environmental and territorial modelling for planning and design, FedOAPress, Napoli, pp. 105-114. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.6093/978-88-6887-048-5 [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Lombardini, G. (2016), “Vulnerabilità, rischio, resilienza – Principi per nuovi parametri di valutazione del paesaggio”, in Bobbio, R. (ed.), Bellezza ed economia dei paesaggi costieri, Donzelli, Roma, pp. 63-72.
Lombardini, G., Pilogallo, A. and Tucci, G. (2022), “The provision of ecosystem services along the Italian coastal areas – A correlation analysis between environmental quality and urbanization”, in Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Misra, S., Rocha A. M. and Garau, C. (eds), Computational Science and its applications – ICCSA 2022 Workshop – Malaga, Spain, July 4-7, 2022 – Proceedings, Part IV, Springer, Cham, pp. 298-314. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10542-5_21 [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Manning, P., Van Der Plas, F., Soliveres, S., Allan, E., Maestre, F. T., Mace, G., Whittingham, M. J. and Fischer, M. (2018), “Redefining ecosystem multifunctionality”, in Nature Ecology & Evolution, vol. 2, pp. 427-436. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0461-7 [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Mastrangelo, M. E., Weyland, F., Villarino, S. H., Barral, M. P., Nahuehual, L. and Laterra, P. (2014), “Concepts and methods for landscape multifunctionality and a unifying framework based on ecosystem services”, in Landscape Ecology, vol. 29, pp. 345-358. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9959-9 [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Mitchell, M. G. E. and Devisscher, T. (2022), “Strong relationships between urbanization, landscape structure, and ecosystem service multifunctionality in urban forest fragments”, in Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 228, article 104548, pp. 1-22. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104548 [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Pilogallo, A., Saganeiti, L., Fiorini, L. and Marucci, A. (2022), “Ecosystem Services for Planning Impacts Assessment on Urban Settlement Development”, in Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Misra, S., Rocha, A. M. A. C. and Garau, C. (eds), Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2022 Workshops, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 13380, Springer, Cham, pp. 241-253. Available at: doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10542-5_17 [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Pilogallo, A. and Scorza, F. (2022), “Ecosystem Services Multifunctionality – An Analytical Framework to Support Sustainable Spatial Planning in Italy”, in Sustainability, vol. 14, issue 6, article 3346, pp. 1-17. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.3390/su14063346 [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Pilogallo, A. and Scorza, F. (2021), “Regulation and Maintenance Ecosystem Services (ReMES) – A Spatial Assessment in the Basilicata Region (Southern Italy)”, in Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Misra, S., Garau, C., Blečić, I., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B. O., Rocha A. M., Tarantino, E. and Torre, C. M. (eds), Computational Science and its applications – ICCSA 2021 – 21st International Conference, Cagliari, Italy, September 13-16, 2021 – Proceedings Part VII, Springer, Cham, pp. 703-716. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87007-2_50 [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Pilogallo, A., Scorza, F. and Murgante, B. (2021), “An Ecosystem Services-Based Territorial Ranking for Italian Provinces”, in Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Misra, S., Garau, C., Blečić, I., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B. O., Rocha A. M., Tarantino, E. and Torre, C. M. (eds), Computational Science and its applications – ICCSA 2021 – 21st International Conference, Cagliari, Italy, September 13-16, 2021 – Proceedings Part VII, Springer, Cham, pp. 692-702. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87007-2_49 [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Ratti, C. and Belleri, D. (2020), “Verso una cyber-ecologia | Towards a cyber ecology”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 8, pp. 8-19. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/812020 [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Rodríguez-Loinaz, G., Alday, J. G. and Onaindia, M. (2015), “Multiple ecosystem services landscape index – A tool for multifunctional landscapes conservation”, in Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 147, pp. 152-163. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.09.001 [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Ronchi, S. (2018), Ecosystem Services for Spatial Planning – Innovative Approaches and Challenges for Practical Applications, Springer, Cham. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90185-5 [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Salata, S. and Grillenzoni, C. (2021), “A spatial evaluation of multifunctional Ecosystem Service networks using Principal Component Analysis – A case of study in Turin, Italy”, in Ecological Indicators, vol. 127, article 107758, pp. 1-13. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107758 [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Shen, J., Li, S., Liang, Z., Liu, L., Li, D. and Wu, S. (2020), “Exploring the heterogeneity and nonlinearity of trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services bundles in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration”, in Ecosystem Services, vol. 43, article 101103, pp. 1-15. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101103 [Accessed 22 March 2023].
SNAI – Strategia Nazionale per le Aree Interne (2014), Strategia nazionale per le aree interne – Definizione, obiettivi, strumenti e governance – Accordo di partenariato 2014-2020. [Online] Available at: miur.gov.it/documents/20182/890263/strategia_nazionale_aree_interne .pdf/d10fc111-65c0-4acd-b253-63efae626b19 [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Stürck, J. and Verburg, P. H. (2017), “Multifunctionality at what scale? A landscape multifunctionality assessment for the European Union under conditions of land use change”, in Landscape Ecology, vol. 32, pp. 481-500. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0459-6 [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Terrell, G. R. and Scott, D. W. (1992), “Variable Kernel Density Estimation”, in The Annals of Statistics, vol. 20, issue 3, pp. 1236-1265. [Online] Available at: jstor.org/stable/2242011 [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Tucci, G. (2019), MedCoast AgroCities – New operational strategies for the development of the Mediterranean agro-urban areas, LIStLab, Trento-Barcellona.
Tucci, G. and Ratti, C. (2022), “La tecnologia come abilitatore di un nuovo ecosistema urbano responsivo – Intervista a Carlo Ratti (CRA Studio) | Technology as an enabler of a new ecosystem responsive urbanism – Interview with Carlo Ratti (CRA Studio)”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 12, pp. 190-201. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/12172022 [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Uehara, T., Hidaka, T., Tsuge, T., Sakurai, R. and Cordier, M. (2021), “An adaptive social-ecological system management matrix for guiding ecosystem service improvements”, in Ecosystem Services, vol. 50, article 101312, pp. 1-14. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101312 [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Wang, J., Li, Y., Wang, S., Li, Q., Li, L. and Liu, X. (2023), “Assessment of Multiple Ecosystem Services and Ecological Security Pattern in Shanxi Province, China”, in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 20, issue 6, article 4819, pp. 1-18. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20064819 [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Wirth, L. (1938), “Urbanism as a Way of Life”, in American Journal of Sociology, vol. 44, issue 1, pp. 1-24. [Online] Available at: jstor.org/stable/2768119 [Accessed 22 March 2023].
Yan, J., Feng, P., Jia, F., Su, F., Wang, J. and Wang, N. (2023), “Identification of secondary functional areas and functional structure analysis based on multisource geographic data”, in Geocarto International, vol. 38, issue 1, article 2191995, pp. 1-19. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2023.2191995 [Accessed 22 March 2023].
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Categorie
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2023 Giampiero Lombardini, Angela Pilogallo, Giorgia Tucci
TQuesto lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.
AGATHÓN è pubblicata sotto la licenza Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY).
License scheme | Legal code
Questa licenza consente a chiunque di:
Condividere: riprodurre, distribuire, comunicare al pubblico, esporre in pubblico, rappresentare, eseguire e recitare questo materiale con qualsiasi mezzo e formato.
Modificare: remixare, trasformare il materiale e basarti su di esso per le tue opere per qualsiasi fine, anche commerciale.
Alle seguenti condizioni
Attribuzione: si deve riconoscere una menzione di paternità adeguata, fornire un link alla licenza e indicare se sono state effettuate delle modifiche; si può fare ciò in qualsiasi maniera ragionevole possibile, ma non con modalità tali da suggerire che il licenziante avalli l'utilizzatore o l'utilizzo del suo materiale.
Divieto di restrizioni aggiuntive: non si possono applicare termini legali o misure tecnologiche che impongano ad altri soggetti dei vincoli giuridici su quanto la licenza consente di fare.
Note
Non si è tenuti a rispettare i termini della licenza per quelle componenti del materiale che siano in pubblico dominio o nei casi in cui il nuovo utilizzo sia consentito da una eccezione o limitazione prevista dalla legge.
Non sono fornite garanzie. La licenza può non conferire tutte le autorizzazioni necessarie per l'utilizzo che ci si prefigge. Ad esempio, diritti di terzi come i diritti all'immagine, alla riservatezza e i diritti morali potrebbero restringere gli usi del materiale.
