Dealing with complexity – Integrating LCA, ERA and ESA to assess human impacts and benefits on the biosphere
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/1412023Keywords:
life cycle assessment, environmental risk assessment, ecosystem services assessment, integration, holistic and systemic approachAbstract
How we live, regardless of where this happens, impacts the biosphere and leads to chain reactions in different spheres that affect both nature and humans on a global scale: climate change, health risks, and loss of biodiversity all concur in a polycrisis condition that amplifies the state of uncertainty surrounding our future and the vulnerability of the entire ecosystem, especially since the design actions put in place do not address the cogent environmental issue systemically and holistically. With this in mind, the paper advocates for an integration of LCA, ERA and ESA, three analysis tools, to assess the totality of impacts and benefits of anthropogenic activities at different spatial and temporal scales by highlighting their strengths, limitations and critical issues, but also their objectives, survey methodologies, metrics and cause-effect pathways, critically reporting also on recent research which has attempted their combination.
Article info
Received: 27/10/2023; Revised: 09/11/2023; Accepted: 11/11/2023
Downloads
Article Metrics Graph
References
Alvarenga, R. A. F., Huysveld, S., Taelman, S. E., Sfez, S., Préat, N., Cooreman-Algoed, M., Sanjuan-Delmás, D. and Dewulf, J. (2020), “A framework for using the handprint concept in attributional life cycle (sustainability) assessment”, in Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 265, article 121743, pp. 1-9. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121743 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Andaloro, B., de Waal, M. and Suurenbroek, F. (2022), “Lo spazio pubblico adattivo – Esplorare la transizione digitale per il benessere sociale e ambientale | Adaptive public spaces – Exploring digital transition for social and environmental benefit”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 12, pp. 68-75. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/1262022 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Anderson, C. C., Denich, M., Warchold, A., Kropp, J. P. and Pradhan, P. (2022), “A systems model of SDG target influence of the Goals on the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development”, in Sustainability Sciences, vol. 17, pp. 1459-1472. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-01040-8 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Apreda, C., D’Ambrosio, V. and Di Martino, F. (2019), “A climate vulnerability and impact assessment model for complex urban systems”, in Environmental Science & Policy, vol. 93, pp. 11-26. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.12.016 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Arskey, H. and O’Malley, L. (2005), “Scoping studies – Towards a methodological framework”, in International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 8, issue 1, pp. 19-32. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
ASviS – Alleanza Italiana per lo Sviluppo Sostenibile (2020), Politiche per fronteggiare la crisi da Covid-19 e realizzare l’Agenda 2030 per lo sviluppo sostenibile. [Online] Available at: asvis.it/public/asvis2/files/Pubblicazioni/RapportoASviSCovidAgenda2030.pdf [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Aven, T. (2016), “Risk assessment and risk management – Review of recent advances on their foundation”, in European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 253, issue 1, pp. 1-13. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Ayoub, N., Musharavati, F., Pokharel, S. and Gabbar, H. A. (2015), “Risk based life cycle assessment conceptual framework for energy supply systems in large buildings”, in Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 107, pp. 291-309. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.075 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Baiani, S. and Altamura, P. (2019), “Il Processo del Progetto per la Resource Productivity – Un Caso Studio | The Design Process towards Resource Productivity – A Case Study”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture Art and Design, vol. 5, pp. 83-92. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/592019 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Baral, H., Guariguata, M. R. and Keenan, R. J. (2016), “A proposed framework for assessing ecosystem goods and services from planted forests”, in Ecosystem Services, vol. 22, part B, pp. 260-268. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.002 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Baratta, A. F. L., Andreotti, J., Trulli, L. and Calcagnini, L. (2023), “L’innovazione di prodotto per la transizione ecologica – Il riciclo del laterizio e del vetro | Product innovation for the ecological transition – Brick and glass recycling”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 13, pp. 227-236. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/13192023 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Bason, C., Conway, R., Hill, D. and Mazzucato, M. (2020), A New Bauhaus for a Green Deal, November. [Online] Available at: ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/public-purpose/sites/public-purpose/files/new_bauhaus_cb_rc_dh_mm_0.pdf [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Basso, S., Bisiani, T., Martorana, P. and Venudo, A. (2023), “Vertical farm – Dalle forme dell’agricoltura nuove architetture e città | Vertical farm – New architectures and cities from the forms of agriculture”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 13, pp. 141-152. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/13122023 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Beever, E. A., O’Leary, J., Mengelt, C., West, J. M., Julius, S., Green, N., Magness, D., Petes, L., Stein, B., Nicotra, A. B., Hellmann, J. J., Robertson, A. L., Staudinger, M. D., Rosenberg, A. A., Babij, E., Brennan, J., Schuurman, G. W. and Hofmann, G. E. (2016), “Improving conservation outcomes with a new paradigm for understanding species’ fundamental and realized adaptive capacity”, in Conservation Letters, vol. 9, pp. 131-137. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1111/conl.12190 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Benyus, J. M. (1997), Biomimicry – Innovation Inspired by Nature, Harpercollins, New York.
Beyers, B. and Wackernagel, M. (2019), Ecological Footprint, managing our biocapacity budget – Global Footprint Network, New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island (Canada).
Bjørn, M. O., Molin, C. and Laurent, A. (2017), “Main characteristics of LCA”, in Hauschild, M. Z., Rosenbaum, R. K. and Olsen, S. I. (eds), Life Cycle Assessment | Theory and Practice, Springer, Cham, pp. 9-16. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56475-3 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Bologna, R. and Hasanaj, G. (2023), “Modelli evoluti per la costruzione di un catalogo NbS per la resilienza e la biodiversità | Advanced models for the construction of an NbS catalogue for resilience and biodiversity”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 13, pp. 179-190. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/13152023 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Botsman, R. and Rogers, R. (2010), What’s mine is yours, Harper Business, London.
Brand, S. (1994), How Buildings Learn – What Happens After They’re Built, Viking, New York.
Broström, T., Donarelli, A. and Berg, F. (2017), “Per classificare il patrimonio storico e determinare il risparmio energetico | For the categorisation of historic buildings to determine energy saving”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 1, pp. 135-142. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/1212017 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Buckwell, A., Fleming, C., Smart, J., Mackey, B., Ware, D., Hallgren, W., Sahin, O. and Nalau, J. (2018), “Valuing aggregated ecosystem services at a national and regional scale for Vanuatu using a remotely operable, rapid assessment methodology”, in AARES Conference – 2018 Conference (62nd), February 7-9, 2018, Adelaide (Australia), pp. 1-22. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.273524 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Burkhard, B., Santos-Martin, F., Nedkov, S. and Maes, J. (2018), “An operational framework for integrated Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services (MAES)”, in One Ecosystem, vol. 3, e22831, pp. 1-13. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e22831 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Butera, F. M. (2023), Affrontare la Complessità – Per governare la transizione ecologica, Edizioni Ambiente, Milano.
Büscher, L., Polster, R. and Klussmann, H. (2022), “Botanical concrete – Sperimentazione su substrati di calcestruzzo per l’inverdimento verticale | Botanical concrete – Experimentation on concrete substrates for vertical greening”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture Art and Design, vol. 11, pp. 266-273. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/11242022 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Campioli, A., Dalla Valle, A., Ganassali, S. and Giorgi, S. (2018), “Progettare il ciclo di vita della materia – Nuove tendenze in prospettiva ambientale | Designing the life cycle of materials – New trends in environmental perspective”, in Techne | Journal of Technology for Architecture and Environment, vol. 16, pp. 86-95. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.13128/Techne-23016 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Capra, F. and Henderson, H. (2013), Crescita qualitativa – Per un’economia ecologicamente sostenibile e socialmente equa, Aboca Edizioni, Arezzo.
Carpenter, S. R., Bennett, E. M. and Peterson, G. D. (2006), “Scenarios for ecosystem services – An overview”, in Ecology & Society, vol. 11, issue 1, article 29. [Online] Available at: ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art29/ [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Carson, R. (1962), Silent Spring, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston.
Chaves Coelho Leite, B., Gobatti, L. and Gamba Huttenlocher, I. (2022), “Tetti verdi subtropicali a bassa manutenzione – Verde spontaneo e profondità del substrato | Low-maintenance subtropical green roofs – Spontaneous vegetation and substrate depth”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture Art and Design, vol. 11, pp. 258-265. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/11232022 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Circle Economy (2021), The Circularity Gap Report 2021. [Online] Available at: circle-economy.com/resources/circularity-gap-report-2021 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Clemente, C., Palme, M., Mangiatordi, A., La Rosa, D. and Privitera, R. (2022), “Il verde urbano nella riduzione dei carichi di raffrescamento – Simulazioni nel clima Mediterraneo | Urban green areas in the reduction of cooling loads – Simulations in the Mediterranean climate”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture Art and Design, vol. 11, pp. 182-191. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/11162022 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Cocci Grifoni, R., Brownlee, T. D., Marchesani, G. E. and Ottone, M. F. (2022), “La micro-forestazione urbana per l’adattamento climatico nei porti minori del medio Adriatico | Urban micro-forestry for climate adaptation in the smaller ports of the mid-Adriatic sea”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture Art and Design, vol. 11, pp. 172-181. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/11152022 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Braat, L., Kubiszewski, I., Fioramonti, L., Sutton, P., Farber, S. and Grasso, M. (2017), “Twenty years of ecosystem services – How far have we come and how far do we still need to go?”, in Ecosystem Services, vol. 28, pp. 1-16. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser. 2017.09.008 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Crippa, D., Cason Villa, M., Di Prete, B., Ratti, L., Rebaglio, A., Zanini, M. and Zanotto, F. (2022), “Verso un progetto circolare, tra architettura e allestimento – Piattaforme digitali per il riuso | Towards a circular project, between architecture and exhibition design – Digital platforms for reuse practices”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture Art and Design, vol. 12, pp. 234-245. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/12212022 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Crowther, T. W., Boddy, L. and Jones, T. H. (2011), “Outcomes of fungal interactions are determined by soil invertebrate grazers”, in Ecology Letters, vol. 14, pp. 1134-1142. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01682.x [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Crutzen, P. J. and Stoemer, E. F. (2000), “The Anthropocene”, in IGBP Newsletter, n. 41, pp. 17-18. [Online] Available at: igbp.net/download/18.316f18321323470177580001401/1376383088452/NL41.pdf [Accessed 16 October 2023].
D’Ambrosio, V., Di Martino, F. and Rigillo, M. (2022), “Tecnologie geocomputazionali digitali per il metaprogetto di infrastrutture verdi urbane | Digital geocomputational technologies for the metaproject of urban green infrastructures”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture Art and Design, vol. 11, pp. 162-171. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/11142022 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
de Groot, R., Moolenaar, S., van Weelden, M., Konovska, I. and de Vente, J. (2018), The ESP guidelines in a nutshell (to analyse and capture the benefits of landscape restoration, nature conservation, and sustainable land management). [Online] Available at: es-partnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/The-ESP-Guidelines-in-a-Nutshell-Sept-2018.pdf [Accessed 16 October 2023].
De Joanna, P., Bronzino, E. and Lusi, V. (2022), “Resilienza e circolarità nel progetto edilizio sostenibile – Strumenti di valutazione integrata preliminare | Resilience and circularity in sustainable building design – Integrated tools for pre-intervention assessment”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture Art and Design, vol. 12, pp. 122-135. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/12112022 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
De Luca Peña, L. V., Taelman, S. E., Préat, N., Boone, L., Van der Biest, K., Custódio, M., Hernandez Lucas, S., Everaert, G. and Dewulf, J. (2022), “Towards a comprehensive sustainability methodology to assess anthropogenic impacts on ecosystems – Review of the integration of Life Cycle Assessment, Environmental Risk Assessment and Ecosystem Services Assessment”, in Science of The Total Environment, vol. 808, article 152125, pp. 1-17. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152125 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Desmaison, B., Buondonno, L., Viola, G. and Giachetta, A. (2019), “Abitare l’emergenza – Progetto per un insediamento adattivo a Bélen, Iquitos | Living with emergency – Design for an adaptive settlement in Belén, Iquitos”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture Art and Design, vol. 6, pp. 138-147. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/6132019 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Díaz, S., Settele, J., Brondízio, E., Ngo, H. T., Guèze, M., Agard Trinidad, J., Arneth, A., Balvanera, P., Brauman, K., Butchart, S., Chan, K., Garibaldi, L., Ichii, K., Liu, J., Subramanian, S. M., Midgley, G., Miloslavich, P., Molnar, Z., Obura, D., Pfaff, A., Polasky, S., Purvis, A., Razzaque, J., Reyers, B., Chowdhury, R. R., Shin, Y.-J., VIsseren-Hamakers, I., Willis, K. and Zayas, C. (2019), Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, Bonn.
Dodd, N., Cordella, M., Traverso, M. and Donatello, S. (2017), Level(s) – A common EU framework of core sustainability indicators for office and residential buildings – Parts 1 and 2 – Introduction to Level(s) and how it works (Beta v1.0), EUR 28899 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, JRC109285. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.2760/827838 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Dudley N. and Stolton, S. (2009), The Protected Areas Benefits Assessment Tool – A Methodology. [Online] Available at: awsassets.panda.org/downloads/pa_bat_final_english.pdf [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Dunford, R., Harrison, P., Smith, A., Dick, J., Barton, D. N., Martin-Lopez, B., Kelemen, E., Jacobs, S., Saarikoski, H., Turkelboom, F., Verheyden, W., Hauck, J., Antunes, P., Aszalós, R., Badea, O., Baró, F., Berry, P., Carvalho, L., Conte, G., Blanco, G. G., Howard, D., Giuca, R., Gomez-Baggethun, E., Grizzetti, B., Izakovicova, Z., Kopperoinen, L., Langemeyer, J., Luque, S., Lapola, D. M., Martinez-Pastur, G., Mukhopadhyay, R., Roy, S. B., Niemelä, J., Norton, L., Ochieng, J., Odee, D., Palomo, I., Pinho, P., Priess, J., Rusch, G., Saarela, S.-R., Santos, R., van der Wal, J. T., Vadineanu, A., Vári, Á., Woods, H. and Yli-Pelkonen, V. (2018), “Integrating methods for ecosystem service assessment – Experiences from real world situations”, in Ecosystem Services, vol. 29, pp. 499-514. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.014 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Durmisevic, E. (2019), Circular economy in construction design strategies for reversible buildings, BAMB, Netherlands. [Online] Available at: bamb2020.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Reversible-Building-Design-Strateges.pdf [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Durmisevic, E. (2018), WP3 – Reversible Building Design Guidelines, BAMB. [Online] Available at: bamb2020.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Reversible-Building-Design-guidelines-and-protocol.pdf [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Durmisevic, E. (2006), Transformable building structures – Design for disassembly as a way to introduce sustainable engineering to building design & construction, Cedris M&CC, Delft. [Online] Available at: repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid%3A9d2406e5-0cce-4788-8ee0-c19cbf38ea9a [Accessed 16 October 2023].
EEA – European Environment Agency (2021), Growth without economic growth – Narratives for Change. [Online] Available at: eea.europa.eu/downloads/beed0c89209641548564b046abcaf43e/1617707707/ growth-without-economic-growth.pdf [Accessed 16 October 2023].
EEA – European Environment Agency (1998), “Environmental Risk Assessment – Approaches, Experiences and Information Sources”, in eea.europa.eu, 24/03/1998. [Online] Available at: eea.europa.eu/publications/GH-07-97-595-EN-C2 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2015), Delivering the Circular Economy – A Toolkit for Policymakers. [Online] Available at: ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/a-toolkit-for-policymakers [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2010), Towards the Circular Economy – Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. [Online] Available at: werktrends.nl/app/uploads/2015/06/Rapport_McKinsey-Towards_A_Circular_Economy.pdf [Accessed 16 October 2023].
EPA – Environment Protection Agency (2019), Guidelines for Human Exposure Assessment, Risk Assessment Forum, EPA/100/B-19/001, U.S. Environment Protection Agency, Washington (DC). [Online] Available at: epa.gov/sites/production/files/2020-01/documents/guidelines_for_human_exposure_assessment_final2019.pdf [Accessed 16 October 2023].
EPA – Environment Protection Agency (2016a), Ecological Risk Assessment. [Online] Available at: epa.gov/risk/ecological-risk-assessment [Accessed 16 October 2023].
EPA – Environment Protection Agency (2016b), Human Health Risk Assessment. [Online] Available at: epa.gov/risk/human-health-risk-assessment [Accessed 16 October 2023].
EPA – Environment Protection Agency (2011), Exposure Factors Handbook, U.S. Environment Protection Agency, Washington (DC). [Online] Available at: epa.gov/expobox/exposure-factors-handbook-2011-edition [Accessed 16 October 2023].
EPA – Environment Protection Agency (2003), Framework for cumulative risk assessment, Risk Assessment Forum, EPA/630/P-02/001F, U.S. Environment Protection Agency, Washington (DC). [Online] Available at: epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-11/documents/frmwrk_cum_risk_assmnt.pdf [Accessed 16 October 2023].
EPA – Environment Protection Agency (1998), Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment, Risk Assessment Forum, EPA/630/R-95/002F, U.S. Environment Protection Agency, Washington (DC). [Online] Available at: epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-11/documents/eco_risk_assessment1998.pdf [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Eunomia (2020), Plastics – Can Life Cycle Assessment Rise to the Challenge? – How to critically assess LCA for policy making. [Online] Available at: eunomia.co.uk/reports-tools/plastics-can-life-cycle-assessment-rise-to-the-challenge/ [Accessed 16 October 2023].
European Commission (2021a), New European Bauhaus – Shaping more beautiful, sustainable and inclusive forms of living together. [Online] Available at: europa.eu/new-european-bauhaus/index_en [Accessed 16 October 2023].
European Commission (2021b), Understanding Product Environmental Footprint and Organisation Environmental Footprint methods. [Online] Available at: circabc.europa.eu/ui/group/6e9b7f79-da96-4a53-956f-e8f62c9d7fed/library/537534a4-9c76-40a1-b488-e9127db2befd/details [Accessed 16 October 2023].
European Commission (2021c), Commission recommendation of 16.12.2021 on the use of the Environmental Footprint methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organisations, document C(2021)9332, 9332 final. [Online] Available at: eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=PI_COM%3AC%282021%299332 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
European Commission (2020a), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – A Renovation Wave for Europe – Greening our buildings, creating jobs, improving lives, document 52020DC0662, 662 final. [Online] Available at: eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1603122220757&uri=CELEX:52020DC0662 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
European Commission (2020b), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – A new EU Circular Economy Action Plan for a cleaner and more competitive Europe, document 52020DC0098, 98 final. [Online] Available at: eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1583933814386&uri=COM:2020:98:FIN [Accessed 16 October 2023].
European Commission (2020c), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – Europe’s moment – Repair and Prepare for the Nex Generation, document 52020DC0456, 456 final. [Online] Available at: eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0456&qid=1700296616928 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
European Commission (2020d), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 – Bringing nature back into our lives, document 52020DC0380, 380 final. [Online] Available at: eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0380 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
European Commission (2019), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – The European Green Deal, document 52019DC0640, 640 final. [Online] Available at: eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2019%3A640%3AFIN [Accessed 16 October 2023].
European Commission (2015), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – Closing the Loop – An EU action plan for the Circular Economy, document 52015DC0614, 614 final. [Online] Available at: eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52015DC0614 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
European Commission (2009), Directive 2009/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to improve and extend the greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme of the Community, document 32009L0029, L 140/63. [Online] Available at: eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32009L0029 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
European Commission (2003), Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament – Integrated Product Policy – Building on Environmental Life-Cycle Thinking, document 52003DC0302, 0302 final. [Online] Available at: eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52003DC0302 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Ferrante, T., Romagnoli, F. and Villani, T. (2023), “Sviluppo urbano sostenibile – Organizzazione di contenuti informativi per la transizione verso i Distretti a Energia Positiva | Sustainable urban development – Organizing information content for the transition to Positive Energy Districts”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 13, pp. 191-204. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/13162023 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Ferrara, M. and Squatrito, A. (2022), “L’innovazione design-driven dei materiali circolari a base biologica – Strategie e competenze per la progettazione | Design-driven innovation of bio-based circular materials – Design strategies and skills”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture Art and Design, vol. 11, pp. 288-299. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/11262022 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Fioramonti, L. (2021), “Prefazione”, in Butera, F. M. (2023), Affrontare la Complessità – Per governare la transizione ecologica, Edizioni Ambiente, Milano, pp. 9-11.
Friedman, T. L. (2016), Thank You for Being Late – An Optimist’s Guide to Thriving in the Age of Accelerations, Picador, New York.
Gaspari, J., Marchi, L., Oberosler, C. and Antonini, E. (2022), “Strumenti di monitoraggio per abitare il risparmio energetico nell’edilizia sociale | Monitoring tools as energy saving enablers in social housing context”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture Art and Design, vol. 12, pp. 136-145. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/12122022 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Ghosh, A. (2017), La grande cecità – Il cambiamento climatico e l’impensabile, Neri Pozza, Vicenza.
Gonzalez, M. and Navarro, J. (2006), “Assessment of the decrease of CO2 emission in the construction field through the selection materials – Practical case study of three houses of low environmental impact”, in Building and Environment, vol. 41, issue 7, pp. 902-909. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.04.006 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Gregr, E. J., Christensen, V., Nichol, L., Martone, R. G., Markel, R. W., Watson, J. C., Harley, C. D. G., Pakhomov, E. A., Shurin, J. B. and Chan, K. M. A. (2020), “Cascading social-ecological costs and benefits triggered by a recovering keystone predator”, in Science, vol. 368, issue 6496, pp. 1243-1247. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1126/science.aay5342 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Groen, E. A., Bokkers, E. A. M., Heijungs, R. and de Boer, I. J. M. (2017), “Methods for global sensitivity analysis in life cycle assessment”, in The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, vol. 22, pp. 1125-1137. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1217-3 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Guinée, J. B., Heijungs, R., Huppes, G., Zamagni, A., Masoni, P., Buonamici, R., Ekvall, T. and Rydberg, T. (2011), “Life Cycle Assessment – Past, present, and future”, in Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 45, issue 1, pp. 90-96. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1021/es101316v [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Habraken, N. J. (1972), Supports – An alternative to mass housing, Architectural Press, London.
Haines-Young, R. and Potschin, M. (2010), “The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being”, in Raffaelli, D. G. and Frid, C. L. J. (eds), Ecosystem Ecology – A New Synthesis, Cambridge University Press, pp. 110-139. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750458.007 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Hammond, G. P. and Jones, C. I. (2008), “Embodied energy and carbon in construction materials”, in Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineering | Energy, vol. 161, issue 2, pp. 87-98. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1680/ener.2008.161.2.87 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Harrison, P. A., Dunford, R., Barton, D. N., Kelemen, E., Martín-López, B., Norton, L., Termansen, M., Saarikoski, H., Hendriks, K., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Czúcz, B., García- Llorente, M., Howard, D., Jacobs, S., Karlsen, M., Kopperoinen, L., Madsen, A., Rusch, G., van Eupen, M. and Zulian, G. (2018), “Selecting methods for ecosystem service assessment – A decision tree approach”, in Ecosystem Services, vol. 29, pp. 481-498. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.016 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Holsman, K., Samhouri, J., Cook, G., Hazen, E., Olsen, E., Dillard, M., Kasperski, S., Gaichas, S., Kelble, C. R., Fogarty, M. and Andrews, K. (2017), “An ecosystem-based approach to marine risk assessment”, in Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, vol. 3, issue 1, article e12056, pp. 1-16. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1002/ehs2.1256 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Howard, J., Sutton-Grier, A., Herr, D., Kleypas J., Landis, E., Mcleod, E., Pidgeon, E. and Simpson, S. (2017), “Clarifying the role of coastal and marine systems in climate mitigation”, in Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, vol. 15, issue 1, pp. 42-50. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1002/fee.1451 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Igos, E., Benetto, E., Meyer, R., Baustert, P. and Othoniel, B. (2019), “How to treat uncertainties in life cycle assessment studies?”, in The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, vol. 24, pp. 794-807. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1477-1 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
IGS – Independent Group of Scientists appointed by the Secretary-General (2023), Global Sustainable Development Report 2023 – Times of crisis, times of change – Science for accelerating transformations to sustainable development, United Nations, New York. [Online] Available at: sdgs.un.org/sites/default/files/2023-09/FINAL%20GSDR%202023-Digital%20-110923_1.pdf [Accessed 16 October 2023].
IPBES – Intergovernmental Science-Policy Panel on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (2016a), Preliminary guide regarding diverse conceptualization of multiple values of nature and its benefits, including biodiversity and ecosystem functions and services (deliverable 3 d), IPEBES/4/INF/13. [Online] Available at: ipbes.net/sites/default/files/downloads/IPBES-4-INF-13_EN.pdf [Accessed 16 October 2023].
IPBES – Intergovernmental Science-Policy Panel on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (2016b), The methodological assessment report on scenarios and models of biodiversity and ecosystem services. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3235429 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2023), Climate Change 2023 – Synthesis Report – Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2018), Global warming of 1.5 oC – An IPCC Special Report. [Online] Available at: ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2019/06/SR15_Full_Report_Low_Res.pdf [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Kahneman, D. (2007), Economia della felicità, Il Sole 24 Ore, Milano.
Kasper, M. and Stroomer, E. (2021), “Moltiplicare le vite dei tessuti – Raccolta e riciclo dei tessuti nell’Africa urbanizzata | Multiplying textile lives – Textile collection and recycling in urban Africa”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture Art and Design, vol. 9, pp. 224-231. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/9222021 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Koellner, T., Baan, L., Beck, T., Brandão, M., Civit, B., Margni, M., Canals, L. M., Saad, R., Souza, D. M. and Müller-Wenk, R. (2013), “UNEP-SETAC guideline on global land use impact assessment on biodiversity and ecosystem services in LCA”, in The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, vol. 18, issue 6, pp. 1188-1202. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0579-z [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Koellner, T., Bonn, A., Arnhold, S., Bagstad, K. J., Fridman, D., Guerra, C. A., Kastner, T., Kissinger, M., Kleemann, J., Kuhlicke, C., Liu, J., López-Hoffman, L., Marques, A., Martín-López, B., Schulp, C. J. E., Wolff, S. and Schröter, M. (2019), “Guidance for assessing interregional ecosystem service flows”, in Ecological Indicators, vol. 105, pp. 92-106. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.046 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Kovach, R. P., Dunham, J. B., Al-Chokhachy, R., Snyder, C. D., Letcher, B. H., Young, J. A., Beever, E. A., Pederson, G. T., Lynch, A. J., Hitt, N. P., Konrad, C. P., Jaeger, K. L., Rea, A. H., Sepulveda, A. J., Lambert, P. M., Stoker, J., Giersch, J. J. and Muhlfeld, C. C. (2019), “An integrated framework for ecological drought across riverscapes of North America”, in Bioscience, vol. 69, pp. 418-431. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz040 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Kreissl, A. (2021), “Risorsa materasso – Il potenziale dei materiali di scarto | Resource mattress – The potential of refuse materials”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture Art and Design, vol. 9, pp. 184-193. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/9182021 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Kuitttinen, M. and Linkosalmi, L. (2015), Compiling environmental product declarations for wood-based construction products assessment and documentation, Aalto University Publication Series, Aalto.
Langston, Y. L. and Langstone C. A. (2008), “Reliability of building embodied energy modelling – An analysis of 30 Melbourne case studies”, in Construction Management and Economics, vol. 26, issue 2, pp. 147-160. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1080/01446190701716564 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Latouche, S. (2015), Breve trattato sulla decrescita serena e come sopravvivere allo sviluppo, Bollati Boringhieri, Milano.
Lauria, M. and Azzalin, M. (2021), “Paradigmi | Paradigms”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture Art and Design, vol. 9, pp. 12-21. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/912021 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Lloyd, S. M. and Ries, R. (2007), “Characterizing, Propagating, and Analyzing Uncertainty in Life-Cycle Assessment – A Survey of Quantitative Approaches”, in Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 11, issue 1, pp. 161-179. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1162/jiec.2007.1136 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Losasso, M. and Verde, S. (2020), “Strategie progettuali di adattamento urbano ed edilizio in scenari di multirischio ambientale | Design strategies for urban and building adaptation in environmental multi-risk scenarios”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 8, pp. 64-73. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/862020 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Lueddeckens, S., Saling, P. and Guenther, E. (2020), “Temporal issues in life cycle assessment – A systematic review”, in The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, vol. 25, issue 8, pp. 1385-1401. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01757-1 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Maes, J., Teller, A., Erhard, M., Condé, S., Vallecillo, S., Barredo, J. I., Paracchini, M. L., Abdul Malak, D., Trombetti, M., Vigiak, O., Zulian, G., Addamo, A. M., Grizzetti, B., Somma, F., Hagyo, A., Vogt, P., Polce, C., Jones, A., Marin, A. I., Ivits, E., Mauri, A., Rega, C., Czúcz, B., Ceccherini, G., Pisoni, E., Ceglar, A., De Palma, P., Cerrani, I., Meroni, M., Caudullo, G., Lugato, E., Vogt, J. V., Spinoni, J., Cammalleri, C., Bastrup-Birk, A., San Miguel, J., San Román, S., Kristensen, P., Christiansen, T., Zal, N., de Roo, A., Cardoso, A. C., Pistocchi, A., Del Barrio Alvarellos, I., Tsiamis, K., Gervasini, E., Deriu, I., La Notte, A., Abad Viñas, R., Vizzarri, M., Camia, A., Robert, N., Kakoulaki, G., Garcia Bendito, E., Panagos, P., Ballabio, C., Scarpa, S., Montanarella, L., Orgiazzi, A., Fernandez Ugalde, O. and Santos-Martín, F. (2020), Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services – An EU ecosystem assessment, Publications Office of the European Union, Ispra, EUR 30161 EN, JRC120383. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.2760/757183 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Marji, N., Shawash, J. and Marji, N. (2021), “Human-made – I rifiuti come risorsa per la rigenerazione urbana nel campo profughi di Jabal al Jofeh | Human-made – Waste as a resource for urban regeneration in Jabal al Jofeh refugee camp”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture Art and Design, vol. 9, pp. 134-145. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/9132021 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
McDonough, W. and Braungart, M. (2013), The Upcycle – Beyond Sustainability – Designing for Abundance, North Point Press, USA.
McDonough, W. and Braungart, M. (2002), Cradle to Cradle – Remaking the Way We Make Things, North Point Press, USA.
MEA – Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005), Ecosystems and Human Well-being – Synthesis, Island Press, Washington (DC). [Online] Available at: millenniumassessment.org/en/Synthesis.aspx [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J. and Behrens III, W. W. (1972), The Limits to Growth, Universe Books, New York.
Morin, E. (2020), “Per l’uomo è tempo di ritrovare sé stesso”, interview by Scialoja, A., in Avvenire.it, 15/04/2020. [Online] Available at: avvenire.it/agora/pagine/per-luomo-tempo-di-ritrovare-se-stesso [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Mouton, L., Allacker, K. and Röck, M. (2023), “Bio-based building material solutions for environmental benefits over conventional construction products – Life cycle assessment of regenerative design strategies (1/2)”, in Energy and Buildings, vol. 282, article 112767, pp. 1-14. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112767 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Muazu, R. I., Rothman, R. and Maltby, L. (2021), “Integrating life cycle assessment and environmental risk assessment – A critical review”, in Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 293, article 126120, p. 1-13. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126120 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Ness, D. (2021), “Dalla nuova edilizia alla rigenerazione – Può il Nuovo Bauhaus ridefinire l’architettura e dare risposte ai cambiamenti globali? | The shift from new build to regeneration – Can the New Bauhaus transform architecture and design to meet global challenges?”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture Art and Design, vol. 9, pp. 22-31. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/922021 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Neugarten, R. A., Langhammer, P. F., Osipova, E., Bagstad, K. J., Bhagabati, N., Butchart, S. H. M., Dudley, N., Elliott, V., Gerber, L. R., Gutierrez Arrellano, C., Ivanić, K.-Z., Kettunen, M., Mandle, L., Merriman, J. C., Mulligan, M., Peh, K. S.-H., Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Semmens, D. J., Stolton, S. and Willcock, S. (2018), Tools for measuring, modelling, and valuing ecosystem services – Guidance for Key Biodiversity Areas, natural World Heritage sites, and protected areas, IUCN | International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland (Switzerland). [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2018.PAG.28.en [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Olivieri, F. (2022), “Progettazione simbiotica per un ecosistema urbano resiliente | Symbiotic design for a resilient urban ecosystem”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 11, pp. 40-49. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/1132022 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Paoletti, I. (2017), “Involucri responsivi – Sperimentazioni con modelli a comportamento naturale | Responsive Envelopes – Experimentations by natural Role Models”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 2, pp. 213-218. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/2282017 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Pauli, G. (2009), Blue Economy, Edizioni Ambiente, Milano.
Potschin-Young, M., Haines-Young, R., Görg, C., Heink, U., Jax, K. and Schleyer, C. (2018), “Understanding the role of conceptual frameworks – Reading the ecosystem service cascade”, in Ecosystem Services, vol. 29, part C, pp. 428-440. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.05.015 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Prado, V., Cinelli, M., Ter Haar, S. F., Ravikumar, D., Heijungs, R., Guinée, J. and Seager, T. P. (2020), “Sensitivity to weighting in life cycle impact assessment (LCIA)”, in The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, vol. 25, pp. 2393-2406. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01718-3 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Pratesi, I. (ed.) (2020), Pandemie, l’Effetto Boomerang della Distruzione degli Ecosistemi – Tutelare la Salute Umana Conservando la Biodiversità, WWF Italia Onlus, Roma. [Online] Available at: wwfit.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/pandemie_e_distruzione_degli_ ecosistemi.pdf [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Preiser, R., Biggs, R., De Vos, A. and Folke, C. (2018), “Social-ecological systems as complex adaptive systems – Organizing principles for advancing research methods and approaches”, in Ecology and Society, vol. 23, issue 4, article 46, pp. 1-15. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.5751/ES-10558-230446 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Raworth, K. (2017), Doughnut Economics – Seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist, Random House, London.
Reina, V., Kephalopoulos, S., Zenié, I., Pina De Menezes Borges, M., Del Rio Martin, A., Radovnikovic, A. and Stecca, L. (2014), Harmonising and integrating existing exposure factors systems world-wide – Feasibility study report, EUR 26915 – JRC91832, Publications Office of the European Union. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.2788/20871 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Remme, R., de Nijs, T. and Paulin, M. (2018), Natural Capital Model – Technical documentation of the quantification, mapping and monetary valuation of urban ecosystem services, RIVM report 2017-0040. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.21945/RIVM-2017-0040 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Richardson, K., Steffen, W., Lucht, W., Bendtsen, J., Cornell, S. E., Donges, J. F., Drüke, M., Fetzer, I., Bala, G., von Bloh, W., Feulner, G., Fiedler, S., Gerten, D., Gleeson, T., Hofmann, M., Huiskamp, W., Kummu, M., Mohan, C., Nogu.s-Bravo, D., Petri, S., Porkka, M., Rahmstorf, S., Schaphoff, S., Thonicke, K., Tobian, A., Virkki, V., Wang-Erlandsson, L., Weber, L. and Rockström, J. (2023), “Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries”, in Science Advances, vol. 9, issue 37, article eadh2458, pp. 1-16. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adh2458 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Romano, R., Belardi, E., Gallo, P. and Distefano, D. L. (2022), “Sistemi costruttivi low-tech 4.0 – Innovazione di prodotto-processo BIM-based per la prefabbricazione in cartone ondulato | 4.0 low-tech building systems – BIM-based product-process innovation for corrugated cardboard prefabrication”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture Art and Design, vol. 12, pp. 158-167. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/12142022 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Rosenthal, A., Verutes, G., McKenzie, E., Arkema, K. K., Bhagabati, N., Bremer, L. L., Olwero, N. and Vogl, A. L. (2015), “Process matters – A framework for conducting decision-relevant assessments of ecosystem services”, in International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, vol. 11, issue 3, pp. 190-204. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2014.966149 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Runting, R. K., Bryan, B. A., Dee, L. E., Maseyk, F. J. F., Mandle, L., Hamel, P., Wilson K. A., Yetka, K., Possingham, H. P. and Rhodes, J. R. (2017), “Incorporating climate change into ecosystem service assessments and decisions – A review supplementary materials”, in Global Change Biology, vol. 23, issue 1, pp. 28-41. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13457 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Santos Malaguti de Sousa, C., Queiroz Ferreira Barata, T., Dutra Profírio de Souza, C. and de Melo, F. G. (2023), “Gestione delle foreste urbane – Percorsi tecnologici design-driven per la valorizzazione dei rifiuti da potatura | Urban forests management – Design-driven technological routes for wood waste valuing”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 13, pp. 291-300. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/13252023 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Scalisi, F. and Ness, D. (2022), “Simbiosi tra vegetazione e costruito – Un approccio olistico, sistemico e multilivello | Symbiosis of greenery with built form – A holistic, systems, multi-level approach”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 11, pp. 26-39. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/1122022 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Scalisi, F. and Sposito, C. (2021), “Strategie e approcci ‘green’ – Un contributo dall’off-site e dall’upcycling dei container marittimi dismessi | Green strategies and approaches – A contribution from the off-site and upcycling of discarded shipping containers”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture Art and Design, vol. 10, pp. 92-119. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/1092021 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity and the United Nations Environment Programme – World Conservation Monitoring Centre (2012), Best policy guidance for the integration of biodiversity and ecosystem services in standards, Montreal. [Online] Available at: cbd.int/doc/publications/cbd-ts-73-en.pdf [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Simmons, D. C., Dauwe, R., Gowland, R., Gyenes, Z., King, A. G., Riedstra, D. and Schneiderbauer, S. (2017), “Qualitative and quantitative approaches to risk assessment”, in Poljanšek, K., Marin Ferrer, M., De Groeve, T. and Clark, I. (eds), Science for Disaster Risk Management 2017 – Knowing Better and Losing Less, Publications Office of the European Union, pp. 44-130. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.2788/842809 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Small, N., Munday, M. and Durance, I. (2017), “The challenge of valuing ecosystem services that have no material benefits”, in Global Environmental Change, vol. 44, pp. 57-67. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.03.005 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Soergel, B., Kriegler, E., Weindl, I., Rauner, S., Dirnaichner, A., Ruhe, C., Hofmann, M., Bauer, N., Bertram, C., Bodirsky, B. L., Leimbach, M., Leininger, J., Levesque, A., Luderer, G., Pehl, M., Wingens, C., Baumstark, L., Beier, F., Dietrich, J. P., Humpenöder, F., von Jeetze, P., Klein, D., Koch, J., Pietzcker, R., Strefler, J., Lotze-Campen H. and Popp, A. (2021), “A sustainable development pathway for climate action within the UN 2030 Agenda”, in Nature Climate Change, vol. 11, issue 8, pp. 656-664. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01098-3 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Sommariva, E., Canessa, N. V. and Tucci, G. (2022), “Azioni verdi per città innovative – Il nuovo paesaggio agroalimentare | Green actions for innovative cities – The new agri-food landscape”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 11, pp. 150-161. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/11132022 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Sposito, C. and Scalisi, F. (2020), “Ambiente costruito e sostenibilità – Materiali riciclati e Design for Disassembly tra ricerca e buone pratiche | Built environment and sustainability – Recycled materials and Design for Disassembly between research and good practices”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture Art and Design, vol. 8, pp. 106-117. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/8102020 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Sposito, C. and Scalisi, F. (2019), “A possible tool for the choice of building materials – The Environmental Product Declaration (EPD)”, in Bisson, M. (ed.), MDA | 3rd International Conference on Environmental Design, Marsala 03-04 October 2019, Palermo University Press, Palermo, pp. 189-199. [Online] Available at: academia.edu/40469357/A_possible_tool_for_the_choice_of_building_materials_ the_ Environmental_Product_Declaration_EPD_ [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Stelzenmüller, V., Coll, M., Mazaris, A. D., Giakoumi, S., Katsanevakis, S., Portman, M. E., Degen, R., Mackelworth, P., Gimpel, A., Albano, P. G., Almpanidou, V., Claudet, J., Essl, F., Evagelopoulos, T., Heymans, J. J., Genov, T., Kark, S., Micheli, F., Pennino, M. G., Rilov, G., Rumes, B., Steenbeek, J. and Rumes, B. (2018), “A risk-based approach to cumulative effect assessments for marine management”, in Science of the Total Environment, vol. 612, pp. 1132-1140. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.289 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Sullivan, S. and Hannis, M. (2017), “Mathematicsmaybe, but not money – On balance sheets, numbers and nature in ecological accounting”, in Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, vol. 30, issue 7, pp. 1459-1480. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2017-2963 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Świąder, M., Lin, D., Szymon, S., L Kazak, J. K., Iha, K., van Hoof, J., Belčáková, I. and Altiok, S. (2020), “The application of ecological footprint and biocapacity for environmental carrying capacity assessment – A new approach for European cities”, in Environmental Science and Policy, vol. 105, pp. 56-74. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.12.010 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Taelman, S., Sanjuan-Delmás, D., Tonini, D. and Dewulf, J. (2020), “An operational framework for sustainability assessment including local to global impacts – Focus on waste management systems”, in Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 162, article 104964, pp. 1-11. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104964 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Tajima, S. and Nasu, S. (2020), “Architettura mobile off-grid – Uno strumento possibile per la resilienza delle comunità rurali in caso di calamità naturali | Mobile Off-grid Architecture – A potential tool for the resilience of rural communities in the event of natural disasters”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture Art and Design, vol. 8, pp. 118-127. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/8112020 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
TEEB – The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (2013), Guidance Manual for TEEB Country Studies – Version 1. [Online] Available at: teebweb.org/media/2013/10/TEEB_GuidanceManual_2013_1.0.pdf [Accessed 16 October 2023].
TEEB – The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (2011), TEEB Manual for Cities – Ecosystem Services in Urban Management. [Online] Available at: teebweb.org/publications/other/teeb-cities/ [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Thormark, C. (2006), “The effect of material choice on the total energy need and recycling potential of a building”, in Building and Environment, vol. 41, issue 8, pp. 1019-1026. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/8112020 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Tucci, F. and Giampaoletti, M. (2022), “Soluzioni green per la sottrazione e lo stoccaggio di carbonio nei distretti urbani | Green solutions for removing and storing carbon in urban districts”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture Art and Design, vol. 11, pp. 202-213. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/11182022 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Tucci, F. and Sposito, C. (eds) (2020), Resilience between mitigation and adaptation, Project – Essays and Researches publishing series, vol. 3, Palermo University Press, Palermo. [Online] Available at: unipapress.com/book/resilience-ao-between-mitigation-and-adaptation/ [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Tucci, F., Cecafosso, V., Altamura, P. and Giampaoletti, M. (2022), “Simulazione e modellazione per l’adattamento e la mitigazione climatica – Esperienze di riqualificazione ambientale a Roma | Simulation and modelling for climate adaptation and mitigation – Experiences of environmental renovation in Rome”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 12, pp. 106-121. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/12102022 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Tucci, G. and Carlo Ratti Associati (2023), “La tecnologia come abilitatore di un nuovo ecosistema urbano responsivo – Intervista a Carlo Ratti (CRA Studio) | Technology as an enabler of a new ecosystem responsive urbanism – Interview with Carlo Ratti (CRA Studio)”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture Art and Design, vol. 12, pp. 190-201. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/12172022 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
UN – General Assembly (2015), Transforming our World – The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, document A/RES/70/1. [Online] Available at: sdgs.un.org/2030agenda [Accessed 16 October 2023].
UN – United Nations (1992), Agenda 21 – United Nations Conference on Environment and Development – Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. [Online] Available at: sdgs.un.org/sites/default/files/publications/Agenda21.pdf [Accessed 16 October 2023].
UNDESA – United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2023), Global SDG Indicators Data Platform. [Online] Available at: unstats.un.org/sdgs/dataportal [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Valente, R., Losco, S., Bosco, R. and Giacobbe, S. (2022), “Il progetto di infrastrutture verdi per le acque piovane – Note di metodo da un caso studio | Green stormwater infrastructures research through design – Method notes from a case study”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture Art and Design, vol. 11, pp. 192-201. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/11172022 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Value of Nature to Canadians Study Taskforce (2017), Completing and Using Ecosystem Service Assessment for Decision-Making – An Interdisciplinary Toolkit for Managers and Analysts, Federal, Provincial, and Territorial Governments of Canada, Ottawa (ON).
Van der Biest, K., Meire, P., Schellekens, T., D’hondt, B., Bonte, D., Vanagt, T. and Ysebaert, T. (2020), “Aligning biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services in spatial planning – Focus on ecosystem processes”, in Science of the Total Environment, vol. 712, article 136350, pp. 1.12. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136350 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Violano, A., Cannaviello, M. and Del Prete, S. (2021), “Materiali rigenerativi bio-based – Una proposta innovativa per il packaging e i prodotti da costruzione | Bio-based circular materials – Innovative packaging and construction products”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 9, pp. 244-253. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/9242021 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
WCED – World Commission for Environment and Development (1987), Our Common Future World, Brundtland Report. [Online] Available at: are.admin.ch/are/en/home/media/publications/sustainable-development/brundtland-report.html [Accessed 16 October 2023].
WEF – World Economic Forum (2023), The Global Risk Report 2023 – 18th Edition – Insight Report. [Online] Available at: weforum.org/reports/global- risks-report-2023/ [Accessed 16 October 2023].
WEF – World Economic Forum (2021), “This is how climate change could impact the global economy”, in weforum.org, 28/06/2021. [Online] Available at: weforum.org/agenda/2021/06/impact-climate-change-global-gdp/ [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Weiskopf, S. R., Rubenstein, M. A., Crozier, L. G., Gaichas, S., Griffis, R., Halofsky, J. E., Hyde, K. J. W., Morelli, T. L., Morisette, J. T., Muñoz, R. C., Pershing, A. J., Peterson, D. L., Poudel, R., Staudinger, M. D., Sutton-Grier, A. E., Thompson, L., Vose, J., Weltzin, J. F. and Powys Whyte, K. (2020), “Climate change effects on biodiversity, ecosystems, ecosystem services, and natural resource management in the United States”, in Science of The Total Environment, vol. 733, article 137782, pp. 1-18. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137782 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
WHO – World Health Organization (2021), WHO human health risk assessment toolkit – Chemical Hazards, IPCS harmonization project document, no. 8, World Health Organization, Geneva. [Online] Available at: who.int/publications/i/item/9789240035720 [Accessed 16 October 2023].
WMO – World Meteorological Organization (2021), “Weather-related disasters increase over past 50 years, causing more damage but fewer deaths”, in public.wmo.int, 31/08/2021. [Online] Available at: public.wmo.int/en/media/press-release/weather-related-disasters-increase-over-past-50-years-causing-more-damage-fewer [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Cesare Sposito, Giuseppe De Giovanni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This Journal is published under Creative Commons Attribution Licence 4.0 (CC-BY).
License scheme | Legal code
This License allows anyone to:
Share: copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt: remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms
Attribution: Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made; users may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.
No additional restrictions: Users may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices
Users do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give users all of the permissions necessary for their intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
