Hybridisation of the profession – New alliances for an infrastructural innovation of the architectural project
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69143/2464-9309/1912026Keywords:
infrastructural innovation, hybridisation, architectural design, systemic transformation, professional repositioningAbstract
This contribution proposes a reinterpretation of innovation in architecture through the contemporary transformations affecting professional practices. It argues that the current crisis in the management of the project and in the positioning of the profession does not arise from a deficit of technological progress, but from the fragmentation of procedural and decision-making frameworks. Through a systemic analysis of regulatory, digital, and institutional transformations, the research introduces the concept of ‘infrastructural innovation’, understood as a reconfiguration of the cognitive, organisational, and relational structures of the architectural project. From this perspective, ‘new alliances’ define the conditions for a hybrid approach capable of integrating complexity, promoting transdisciplinarity, and transforming the modes of architectural production in response to socio-ecological challenges.
Article info
Received: 28/02/2026; Revised: 05/05/2026; Accepted: 10/05/2026
Downloads
Article Metrics Graph
References
Barosio, M., Boutsen, D., Čeko, A., De Loof, H., De Walsche, J., Gomes, S., Harriss, H., Marcaccio, R., Roth-Čerina, M., Sentieri, C., Sashore, N., Vannucchi, F. and Van Reusel, H. (2024), Architecture’s Afterlife – The multisector impact of an architecture degree, Routledge, London. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.4324/9781003411574 [Accessed 29 March 2026].
Beck, U. (2008), La société du risque – Sur la voie d’une autre modernité, Éditions Flammarion, Paris.
Biau, V. (2020), Les architectes au défi de la ville néolibérale, Editions Parenthèses, Marseille.
Biau, V. and Macaire, E. (2024), “1001 manières d’être architecte”, in education.espazium.ch, 28/10/2024. [Online] Available at: education.espazium.ch/fr/publication-universitaire/1001-manieres-d-etre-architecte [Accessed 29 March 2026].
Biau, V., Macaire, É., Aristide, C., Balti, S., Bouysse-Mesnage, S., Dadour, S., Breton, C., Darrieus, M., Decommer, M., Dujardin, B., Devisme, L., Durand, B., Escar-Otin, N., Flamand, A., Geisler, É., Genyk, I., Hardouin, O., Horsch, B., Hunout, G., Manola, T., Mougey, M., Nordström, M., Ouvrard, P., Pham, F., Proust, S., Roux, J.-M., Sadokh, C., Tribout, S., Vandenbunder, J., Védrine, C., Veillerot, M. and Veillon, O. (2024), Pratiques architecturales émergentes, méconnues ou atypiques et besoins en formation. [Online] Available at: hal.science/hal-04663160v1 [Accessed 29 March 2026].
Bolle de Bal, M. (2003), “Reliance, Déliance, Liance – Émergence de trois notions sociologiques”, in Société, vol. 80, pp. 99-131. [Online] Available at: shs.cairn.info/revue-societes-2003-2-page-99?lang=fr&tab=texte-integral [Accessed 29 March 2026].
Bötticher, K. (1844-1852), Die Tektonik der Hellenen – Die Lehre der tektonischen Kunstformen, Ferdinand Riegel, Potsdam.
Buckminster Fuller, R. (2010), Operating Manual for Spaceship Earth, Lars Müller Publisher, Zurich.
Buckminster Fuller, R. and Applewhite, E.-J (1975), Synergetics – Explorations in the Geometry of Thinking, Macmillan, New York.
Dauge, Y. (2004), Métiers de l’architecture et du cadre de vie – Les architectes en peril, Rapport d’information n° 64 (2004-2005), Commission des affaires culturelles, Sénat Français. [Online] Available at: senat.fr/rap/r04-064/r04-064.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com [Accessed 8 May 2026].
Diez, L. (2024), “Conception-réalisation versus architecte-artisan”, in D’architectures, vol. 316, p. 28. [Online] Available at: darchitectures.com/magazine/rubriques/point-de-vue/5716-conception-realisation-versus-architecte-artisan.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com [Accessed 29 March 2026].
Dunne, A. and Raby, F. (2013), Speculative Everything – Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming, Cambridge-London, MIT Press. [Online] Available at: readings.design/PDF/speculative-everything.pdf [Accessed 29 March 2026].
Durand, B. (2023), Fabrication d’une ‘architecture durable’ en France (2000-2010), Doctoral Thesis, Université Paris-Est, France. [Online] Available at: theses.hal.science/tel-04353097 [Accessed 29 March 2026].
European Commission – Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (2021), Industry 5.0 – Towards a Sustainable, Human-Centric and Resilient European Industry, Publications Office of the European Union. [Online] Available at: data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/308407 [Accessed 8 May 2026].
Geels, F. W. (2002), “Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes – A multi-level perspective and a case-study”, in Research Policy, vol. 31, issue 8-9, pp.1257-1274. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8 [Accessed 29 March 2026].
Halpern, G. (2020), Tous Centaures! – Eloge de l’Hybridation, Le Pommier, Paris.
Harriss, H., Hyde, R. and Marcaccio, R. (2020), Architects after Architecture – Alternative Pathways for Practice, Routledge, New York.
Hudin, A. and Veran, C. (2012), “Labels, certifications, normes pour l’aménagement durable – L’urgence d’instaurer un langage commun”, in lemoniteur.fr, 14/12/2012. [Online] Available at: lemoniteur.fr/article/labels-certifications-normes-pour-l-amenagement-durable-l-urgence-d-instaurer-un-langage-commun.1468789 [Accessed 29 March 2026].
Jonas, H. (1990), Le principe de responsabilité – Une éthique pour la civilisation technologique, Éditions du Cerf, Paris.
Kirby, D. (2010), “The Future is Now – Diegetic Prototypes and the Role of Popular Films in Generating Real-World Technological Development”, in Social Studies of Science, vol. 40, issue 1, pp. 41-70. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1177/0306312709338325 [Accessed 8 May 2026].
Landes-Rechnungshof Vorarlberg (2003), Prüfbericht über das Büro für Zukunftsfragen, Bregenz. [Online] Available at: lrh-v.at/report/buro-fur-zukunftsfragen?utm_source=chatgpt.com [Accessed 29 March 2026].
Latour, B. (2015), Face à Gaïa – Huit conférences sur le Nouveau Régime Climatique, La Découverte, Paris.
Loorbach, D. (2010), “Transition Management for Sustainable Development – A Prescriptive, Complexity-Based Governance Framework”, in Governance | An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, vol. 23, issue 1, pp. 161-183. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x [Accessed 29 March 2026].
Lovelock, J. (2017), La Terre est un être vivant – L’hypothèse Gaïa, Flammarion, Paris.
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J. and Behrens, W. (1972), The Limits to Growth – A report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind, Universe Books, New York.
Morin, E. (2015), Penser global – L’humain et son univers, Éditions Robert Laffont, Paris.
Morin, E. (2007), L’an I de l’ère écologique – La Terre dépend de l’homme qui dépend de la Terre, Tallandier, Paris.
Morin, E. (2005), Introduction à la pensée complexe, Seuil, Paris.
Morin, E. (2004), La Méthode – 6 – Éthique, Seuil, Paris.
Morin, E. (2000), Les sept savoirs nécessaires à l’éducation du futur, Seuil, Paris.
Nourrigat, E. (1999), Guetteur 01 – L’architecture comme prétexte, Diploma in Architecture, École d’Architecture de Montpellier, France.
Nova, N. (2014), Futurs? – La panne des imaginaires technologiques, Les Moutons Électriques, Montélimar.
Piaget, J. (1972), “L’épistémologie des relations interdisciplinaires”, in OCDE (ed.), L’interdisciplinarité – Problèmes d’enseignement et de recherche dans les universités, OCDE, Paris, pp. 131-144.
Prigogine, I. and Stengers, I. (1979), La Nouvelle Alliance – Métamorphose de la science, Gallimard, Paris.
Schot, J. and Geels, F-W. (2008), “Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys – Theory, findings, research agenda, and policy”, in Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, vol. 20, issue 5, pp 537-554. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1080/09537320802292651 [Accessed 29 March 2026].
Stacher, S. (2023), Architecture en temps de crise – Stratégies actuelles et historiques pour la conception de ‘mondes nouveaux, Birkhäuser Architecture, Basel.
Tansley, A. G. (1935), “The use and abuse of vegetational concept and terms”, in Ecology | Ecological Society of America, vol. 16, issue 3, pp. 284-307. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.2307/1930070 [Accessed 29 March 2026].
Toffler, A. (1970), Future Shock, Random House, New York.
UNDP (2018), Foresight Manual – Empowered Futures for the 2030 Agenda, UNDP Global Centre for Public Service Excellence. [Online] Available at: undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/publications/UNDP_ ForesightManual_2018.pdf [Accessed 29 March 2026].
von Bertalanffy, L. (2012), Théorie générale des systèmes, Dunod, Paris.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Elodie Nourrigat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This Journal is published under Creative Commons Attribution Licence 4.0 (CC-BY).
License scheme | Legal code
This License allows anyone to:
Share: copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt: remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms
Attribution: Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made; users may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.
No additional restrictions: Users may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices
Users do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give users all of the permissions necessary for their intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
