Environmental analysis and ecosystemic design. Survey, critical issues and application solutions

  • Chiara Catalano Zurich University of Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
  • Andrea Balducci Zurich University of Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
Keywords: biodiversity, architecture, project, nature, parametric design


Fragmentation, environmental degradation, and habitat loss, due to urbanization and the consequent development of infrastructure, put a great deal of pressure on biological diversity and the functioning of ecosystems. In the coming decades, the ecological footprint of urban areas is set to increase, exacerbating the effect of climate change. In this context, urban development projects represent an excellent opportunity to experiment and implement new solutions which promote biodiversity. This work investigates, on the one hand, how aware designers are of solutions that aim to support biodiversity, and on the other hand, how spatial analysis and the adoption of parametric procedures can optimize cooperation between ecologists and designers from the early design stages.

Author Biographies

Chiara Catalano, Zurich University of Applied Sciences (Switzerland)

Architect and Urban Ecologist, she is a Researcher and a Member of the Green Space Development Research Group, where she carries out research on urban vegetation models and the implementation of green infrastructures. Her latest research project is aimed at the ecosystem design of the building envelope conceived as a habitat capable of hosting wild flora and fauna.
E-mail: cata@zhaw.ch

Andrea Balducci, Zurich University of Applied Sciences (Switzerland)

Environmental Engineer, he holds an MSc in Environment and Natural Resources. He collaborated with the Green Space Development Research Group of the Institute of Natural Resources Sciences of the ZHAW and gained work experience during an internship at the green building company Hydroplant AG (Switzerland) and the studio Laura Gatti (Italy).
E-mail: andrea.balducci044@gmail.com


Apfelbeck, B., Jakoby, C., Hanusch, M., Steffani, E. B., Hauck, T. E. and Weisser, W. W. (2019), “A Conceptual Framework for Choosing Target Species for Wildlife-Inclusive Urban Design”, in Sustainability, vol. 11, n. 24, 6972, pp. 1-20. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.3390/su11246972 [Accessed 24 March 2022].

Apfelbeck, B., Snep, R. P. H., Hauck, T. E., Ferguson, J., Holy, M., Jakoby, C., MacIvor, S. J., Schär, L., Taylor, M. and Weisser, W. W. (2020), “Designing wildlife-inclusive cities that support human-animal co-existence”, in Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 200, 103817, pp. 1-11. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103817 [Accessed 24 March 2022].

BirdLife Svizzera (2019), Nidi Artificiali per gli animali – Un aiuto per la fauna dei diversi ambienti. [Online] Available at: birdlife.ch/sites/default/files/documents/Depliant_Nidi_web.pdf [Accessed 24 March 2022].

Birkeland, J. (2009), “Communicating ecologically positive development”, in Wood, P. and Smitheram, J. (eds), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference of the Association of Architecture Schools in Australasia (AASA), The Association of Architecture Schools in Australasia, New Zealand, pp. 1-10. [Online] Available at: eprints.qut.edu.au/28467/ [Accessed 24 March 2022].

Birkeland, J. (2008), Positive Development – From Vicious Circles to Virtuous Cycles through Built Environment Design, Routledge, London. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.4324/9781849772235 [Accessed 24 March 2022].

Bolund, P. and Hunhammar, S. (1999), “Ecosystem services in urban areas”, in Ecological Economics, vol. 29, issue 2, pp. 293-301. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00013-0 [Accessed 24 March 2022].

Brack, F., Hagenbuch, R., Wütschert, D., Sadlo, F. and Huber, J. (n.d.), Qualitätsindex und Qualitätsmonitoring für Städtische Freiräume – Forschungsbericht. [Online] Available at: vssg.ch/public/upload/assets/2996/200830_Q-Index_Forschungsbericht_ohneAnhang.pdf?fp=1 [Accessed 24 March 2022].

Catalano, C., Meslec, M., Boileau, J., Guarino, R., Aurich, I., Baumann, N., Chartier, F., Dalix, P., Deramond, S., Laube, P., Lee, A. K. K., Ochsner, P., Pasturel, M., Soret, M. and Moulherat, S. (2021), “Smart Sustainable Cities of the New Millennium – Towards Design for Nature”, in Circular Economy and Sustainability, vol. 1, issue 3, pp. 1053-1086. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00100-6 [Accessed 24 March 2022]

Chan, L., Elmqvist, T., Holman, N., Mader, A. and Calcaterra, E. (2014), User’s Manual on the Singapore Index on Cities’ Biodiversity (also known as the City Biodiversity Index), National Parks Board, Singapore. [Online] Available at: cbd.int/authorities/doc/Singapore-Index-User-Manual-20140730-en.pdf [Accessed 24 March 2022].

DGNB System (2020), New Construction, Buildings Criteria Set – Version 2020 international. [Online] Available at: static.dgnb.de/fileadmin/dgnb-system/downloads/criteria/DGNB-Criteria-Set-New-Construction-Buildings-Version-2020-International.pdf [Accessed 24 March 2022).

Dorney, R. S. (1973), “Role of ecologists as consultants in urban planning and design”, in Human Ecology, vol. 1, issue 3, pp. 183-200. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1007/BF01531180 [Accessed 24 March 2022]

European Commission (2015), Towards an EU Research and Innovation Policy Agenda for Nature-Based Solutions & Re-Naturing Cities – Final Report of the Horizon 2020 Expert Group on ‘Nature-based Solutions and Re Naturing Cities’ (Full Version), Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. [Online] Available at: data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/765301 [Accessed 24 March 2022].

Federal Statistical Office (2014), “Swiss land use statistics – Standard Nomenclature NOAS04 – Basic categories and aggregations | Publication”, in Federal Statistical Office, 05/09/2014. [Online] Available at: bfs.admin.ch/bfs/en/home/statistics/catalogues-databases/publications.assetdetail.171190.html [Accessed 24 March 2022].

Garrard, G. E. and Bekessy, S. A. (2015), Biodiversity Sensitive Urban Design – Creating urban environments that are good for people and good for nature. [Online] Available at: ggarrardresearch.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/bsud-final_reduced-size2.pdf [Accessed 24 March 2022].

Garrard, G. E., Williams, N. S. G., Mata, L., Thomas, J. and Bekessy, S. A. (2018), “Biodiversity Sensitive Urban Design”, in Conservation Letters, vol. 11, issue 2, e12411, pp. 1-10. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1111/conl.12411 [Accessed 24 March 2022].

Grimm, N. B., Faeth, S. H., Golubiewski, N. E., Redman, C. L., Wu, J., Bai, X. and Briggs, J. M. (2008), “Global Change and the Ecology of Cities”, in Science, vol. 319, issue 5864, pp. 756-760. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1126/science.1150195 [Accessed 24 March 2022].

Gunnell, K., Murphy, B. and Williams, C. (2019), Designing for Biodiversity – A Technical Guide for New and Existing Buildings, RIBA Publishing, Boston.

Hassan, A. M. and Lee, H. (2015), “The paradox of the sustainable city – Definitions and examples”, in Environment, Development and Sustainability, vol. 17, issue 6, pp. 1267-1285. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1007/s10668-014-9604-z [Accessed 24 March 2022].

Ignatieva, M. (2010), “Design and Future of Urban Biodiversity”, in Müller, N., Werner, P. and Kelcey, J. G. (eds), Urban Biodiversity and Design, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford (UK), pp. 118-144. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1002/9781444318654.ch6 [Accessed 24 March 2022].

Li, X., Li, D., Li, Y., Ma, Z. and Zhai, T. (2002), “Habitat evaluation for crested ibis – A GIS-based approach – Habitat evaluation for crested ibis”, in Ecological Research, vol. 17, issue 5, pp. 565-573. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1703.2002.00515.x [Accessed 24 March 2022].

Liang, C. and Li, X. (2012), “The Ecological Sensitivity Evaluation in Yellow River Delta National Natural Reserve”, in CLEAN – Soil, Air, Water, vol. 40, issue 10, pp. 1197-1207. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1002/clen.201200051 [Accessed 24 March 2022].

Ludwig, F., Hensel, M. and Wolfgang, W. (2021), “Ecolopes – Gebäudehüllen als biodiverse Lebensräume”, in Bauen von morgen – Zukunftsthemen und Szenarien, Bundesinstitut für Bau-, Stadt- und Raumforschung (BBSR), Bonn, pp. 84-89. [Online] Available at: researchgate.net/profile/Ferdinand-Ludwig/publication/358396408_ECOLOPES_-_Gebaudehullen_als_ biodiverse_Lebensraume/links/61fffb14b44cbe4227286feb/ECOLOPES-Gebaeudehuellen-als-biodiverse-Lebensraeume.pdf [Accessed 24 March 2022].

Miller, A. Z., Sanmartín, P., Pereira-Pardo, L., Dionísio, A., Saiz-Jimenez, C., Macedo, M. F. and Prieto, B. (2012), “Bioreceptivity of building stones – A review”, in Science of The Total Environment, vol. 426, pp. 1-12. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.026 [Accessed 24 March 2022].

Moretti, N., Ellul, C., Re Cecconi, F., Papapesios, N. and Dejaco, M. C. (2021), “GeoBIM for built environment condition assessment supporting asset management decision making”, in Automation in Construction, vol. 130, 103859, pp. 1-14. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103859 [Accessed 24 March 2022].

Moura, A. C. and Campagna, M. (2018), “Co-design – Digital tools for knowledge-building and decision-making in planning and design | Co-Progetto – Strumenti digitali per la costruzione della conoscenza e il supporto alle decisioni nella progettazione collaborativa”, in Disegnarecon, vol. 11, n. 20, pp. ED.1-ED.3. [Online] Available at: disegnarecon.univaq.it/ ojs/index.php/disegnarecon/article/viewFile/388/288 [Accessed 24 March 2022].

Opoku, A. (2019), “Biodiversity and the built environment – Implications for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)”, in Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 141, pp. 1-7. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.011 [Accessed 24 March 2022].

Ross, M. R. V., Bernhardt, E. S., Doyle, M. W. and Heffernan, J. B. (2015), “Designer Ecosystems – Incorporating Design Approaches into Applied Ecology”, in Annual Review of Environment and Resources, vol. 40, issue 1, pp. 419-443. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-121012-100957 [Accessed 24 March 2022].

Stokes, M. and Chitrakar, R. M. (2012), “Designing ‘other’ citizens into the city – Investigating perceptions of architectural opportunities for wildlife habitat in the Brisbane CBD”, in QUThinking Conference – Research and Ideas for the Built Environment – Brisbane, 09 November 2012. [Online] Available at: eprints.qut.edu.au/85337/ [Accessed 24 March 2022].

Store, R. and Jokimäki, J. (2003), “A GIS-based multi-scale approach to habitat suitability modeling”, in Ecological Modelling, vol. 169, issue 1, pp. 1-15. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(03)00203-5 [Accessed 24 March 2022].

von Richthofen, A., Knecht, K., Miao, Y. and König, R. (2018), “The ‘Urban Elements’ method for teaching parametric urban design to professionals”, in Frontiers of Architectural Research, vol. 7, n. 4, pp. 573-587. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2018.08.002 [Accessed 24 March 2022].

Weisser, W. W. and Hauck, T. E. (2017), “Animal-Aided Design – Using a species’ life-cycle to improve open space planning and conservation in cities and elsewhere”, in BioRxiv | The preprint server for biology, pp. 1-14. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1101/150359 [Accessed 24 March 2022].

Zanni, M. A., Soetanto, R. and Ruikar, K. (2017), “Towards a BIM-enabled sustainable building design process – Roles, responsibilities, and requirements”, in Architectural Engineering and Design Management, vol. 13, issue 2, pp. 101-129. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2016.1213153 [Accessed 24 March 2022].

Design approach and typologies evaluation (credit: Catalano and Balducci) – AGATHÓN 11_2022
How to Cite
Catalano, C. and Balducci, A. (2022) “Environmental analysis and ecosystemic design. Survey, critical issues and application solutions”, AGATHÓN | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, 11(online), pp. 246-257. doi: 10.19229/2464-9309/11222022.
Architecture | Research & Experimentation
Share |