Ecolopes, beyond greening. A multi-species approach for urban design
Urbanisation, due to its contribution to climate change and loss of biodiversity, damages ecosystems, thereby affecting human health and well-being. Current urban and architectural design approaches, that aim to reduce the environmental impact of buildings, include, among other strategies, the integration of greening systems but focusing primarily on the potential benefits for humans. Other organisms such as animals and microbiota and the self-dynamic development of plant communities, which could play a central role in increasing biodiversity, are not considered in the planning process. This paper describes how the ECOLOPES project overcomes this strictly anthropocentric view, developing a systematic design approach for architecture in a multi-species perspective to create regenerative urban ecosystems.
Aronson, M. F. J., Lepczyk, C. A., Evans, K. L., Goddard, M. A., Lerman, S. B., MacIvor, J. S., Nilon, C. H. and Vargo, T. (2017), “Biodiversity in the City – Key Challenges for Urban Green Space Management”, in Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, vol. 15, issue 4, pp. 189-196. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1002/fee.1480 [Accessed 20 March 2022].
Barton, J. and Pretty, J. (2010), “What is the Best Dose of Nature and Green Exercise for Improving Mental Health? A Multi-Study Analysis”, in Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 44, issue 10, pp. 3947-3955. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1021/es903183r [Accessed 20 March 2022].
Canepa, M. (2018), Riflessioni sullo sviluppo sostenibile in architettura – A trent’anni dal Rapporto Brundtland, Mimesis, Milano.
Corbett, J. B. (2006), Communicating Nature – How We Create and Understand Environmental Messages, Island Press, Washington DC.
EEA – European Environment Agency (2020), Air Quality in Europe – 2020 Report. [Online] Available at: data.europa.eu/doi/10.2800/786656 [Accessed 20 March 2022].
Fernández-Cañero, R., Pérez Urrestarazu, L. and Perini, K. (2018), “Vertical Greening Systems”, in Pérez, G. and Perini, K. (eds), Nature Based Strategies for Urban and Building Sustainability, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 45-54. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812150-4.00004-5 [Accessed 20 March 2022].
Fineschi, S. and Loreto, F. (2020), “A Survey of Multiple Interactions Between Plants and the Urban Environment”, in Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, vol. 3, article 30, pp. 1-19. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2020.00030 [Accessed 20 March 2022].
Gnanasekaran, S. and Venkatachalam, N. (2019), “A Review on Applications of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) For Solar Panel Selection”, in International Journal of Mechanical and Production Engineering Research and Development, vol. 9, issue 2, pp. 11-20. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.24247/ijmperdapr20192 [Accessed 20 March 2022].
Guarini, M. R., Battisti, F. and Chiovitti, A. (2018), “A Methodology for the Selection of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods in Real Estate and Land Management Processes”, in Sustainability, vol. 10, issue 2, article 507, pp. 1-28. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.3390/su10020507 [Accessed 20 March 2022].
Gunantara, N. and Quingsong, A. (2018), “A review of multi-objective optimization – Methods and its applications”, in Cogent Engineering, vol. 5, issue 1, pp. 1-16. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2018.1502242 [Accessed 20 April 2022].
Hamdy, M., Nguyen, A.-T, Hensen, J. L. M. (2016), “A performance comparison of multi-objective optimization algorithms for solving nearly-zero-energy-building design problems”, in Energy and Buildings, vol. 121, pp. 57-71. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.03.035 [Accessed 20 March 2022].
IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2022), Climate Change 2022 – Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability – Summary for Policymakers. [Online] Available at: ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/downloads/report/ IPCC_AR6_WGII_FinalDraft_FullReport.pdf [Accessed 20 March 2022].
IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2015), Climate Change 2014 – Synthesis Report. [Online] Available at: ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/05/SYR_AR5_FINAL_full_wcover.pdf [Accessed 20 March 2022].
IUCN (2016), International Union for Conservation of Nature Annual Report 2016. [Online] Available at: portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2017-001-v.1-En.pdf [Accessed 20 March 2022].
Lepczyk, C. A., Aronson, M. F. J., Evans, K. L., Goddard, M. A., Lerman, S. B. and MacIvor, J. S. (2017), “Biodiversity in the City – Fundamental Questions for Understanding the Ecology of Urban Green Spaces for Biodiversity Conservation”, in BioScience, vol. 67, issue 9, pp. 799-807. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix079 [Accessed 20 March 2022].
Mathiyazhagan, K., Gnanavelbabu, A. and Lokesh Prabhuraj, B. (2019), “A Sustainable Assessment Model for Material Selection in Construction Industries Perspective Using Hybrid MCDM Approaches”, in Journal of Advances in Management Research, vol. 16, issue 2, pp. 234-259. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-09-2018-0085 [Accessed 20 March 2022].
McPhearson, T., Andersson, E., Elmqvist, T. and Frantzeskaki, N. (2015), “Resilience of and through Urban Ecosystem Services”, in Ecosystem Services, vol. 12, pp. 152-156. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.012 [Accessed 20 March 2022].
MEA – Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, (2005), Ecosystems and Human Well-being – Synthesis, Island Press, Washington (DC). [Online] Available at: millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf [Accessed 20 March 2022].
Mela, K., Tiainen, T. and Heinisuo, M. (2012), “Comparative Study of Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods for Building Design”, in Advanced Engineering Informatics, vol. 26, issue 4, pp. 716-726. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2012.03.001 [Accessed 20 March 2022].
Moghtadernejad, S., Chouinard, L. E. and Mirza, M. S. (2020), “Design Strategies Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Tools to Enhance the Performance of Building Façades”, in Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 30, article 101274, pp. 1-14. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101274 [Accessed 20 March 2022].
Naylor, L. A., Kippen, H., Coombes, M. A., Horton, B., MacArthur, M. and Jackson, N. (2017), Greening the Grey – A Framework for Integrated Green Grey Infrastructure (IGGI), University of Glasgow, Glasgow. [Online] Available at: eprints.gla.ac.uk/150672/ [Accessed 20 March 2022].
Penadés-Plà, V., García-Segura, T., Martí, J. V. and Yepes, V. (2016), “A Review of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods Applied to the Sustainable Bridge Design”, in Sustainability, vol. 8, issue 12, article 1295, pp. 1-21. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.3390/su8121295 [Accessed 20 March 2022].
Pérez, G. and Coma, J. (2018), “Green Roofs Classifications, Plant Species, Substrates”, in Pérez, G. and Perini, K. (eds), Nature Based Strategies for Urban and Building Sustainability, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 65-74. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812150-4.00006-9 [Accessed 20 March 2022].
Philo, C. and Wilbert, C. (2000), Animal spaces, beastly places – New geographies of human-animal relations, Routledge, London.
Pisani, M. (2006), Site, Edilstampa, Roma.
Rees, W. E. (1997), “Urban ecosystems – The human dimension”, in Urban Ecosystems – The human dimension, vol. 1, pp. 63-75. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1023/A:1014380105620 [Accessed 20 March 2022].
Schrieke, D., Lönnqvist, J., Blecken, G.-T., Williams, N. S. G. and Farrell, C. (2021), “Socio-Ecological Dimensions of Spontaneous Plants on Green Roofs”, in Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, vol. 3, article 777128, pp. 1-8. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2021.777128 [Accessed 20 March 2022].
Singh, N., Singh, S. and Mall, R. K. (2020), “Urban Ecology and Human Health – Implications of Urban Heat Island, Air Pollution and Climate Change Nexus”, in Verma, P., Singh, P., Singh, S. and Raghubanshi, A. S. (eds), Urban Ecology – Emerging Patterns and Social-Ecological Systems, pp. 317-334. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820730-7.00017-3 [Accessed 20 March 2022].
Tan, T., Mills, G., Papadonikolaki, E. and Liu, Z. (2021), “Combining Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods with Building Information Modelling (BIM) – A Review”, in Automation in Construction, vol. 121, article 103451, pp. 1-11. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103451 [Accessed 20 March 2022].
UN – General Assembly (2015), Transforming our world – The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, document A/RES/70/1. [Online] Available at: sustainabledevelopment.un.org/index.php?page=view&type=111&nr=8496&menu=35 [Accessed 20 March 2022].
Urbanik, J. (2012), Placing animals – An Introduction to the Geography of Human-Animal Relations, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham.
Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Kazimieras Zavadskas, E. and Turskis, Z. (2019), “A combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems”, in Management Decision, vol. 57, issue 9, pp. 2501-2519. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2017-0458 [Accessed 26 April 2022].
Copyright (c) 2022 Maria Canepa, Francesca Mosca , Shany Barath, Alexandre Changenet, Thomas E. Hauck, Ferdinand Ludwig , Enrica Roccotiello, Marta Pianta, Surayyn Uthaya Selvan, Verena Vogler, Katia Perini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This Journal is published under Creative Commons Attribution Licence 4.0 (CC-BY).
License scheme | Legal code
This License allows anyone to:
Share: copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt: remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms
Attribution: Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made; users may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.
No additional restrictions: Users may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Users do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give users all of the permissions necessary for their intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.